Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, The University of Hong Kong, Ap Lei Chau, Hong Kong.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2018 Feb;34(2). doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2952. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
This study examined whether temporal trends exist in treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and quality of diabetes care after implementation of quality improvement initiative in primary care setting.
We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of 202,284 patients with T2D who were routinely managed in primary care clinics. We examined the change over time and the variability between clinics in quality of care from Hospital Authority administrative data over a 5-year period (2009-2013) and used multilevel logistic regression to adjust for patient and clinic characteristics. Observational period was partitioned in 5 calendar years. Ten quality-of-care criteria were selected: adherence to 7 process of care criteria (HbA test, renal function test, full lipid profile, urine protein analysis, retinal screening, lipid-lowering agent prescriptions among patients with hypercholesterolaemia, and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker prescriptions among patients with microalbuminuria) and 3 outcome of care criteria (HbA ≤ 7%, BP ≤ 130/80 mmHg, and LDL-C ≤ 2.6 mmol/L). Variability of standards between clinics was assessed by using intracluster correlation coefficients.
Characteristics of patients with T2D managed in primary care changed substantially during the observational period, with increasing age and usage of insulin and longer duration of diabetes but improved metabolic profiles (all P trend < .001). Performance rates of the 7 process and 3 clinical outcomes of care criteria increased remarkably over time (all P trend < .001). Variations in retinal screening delivery between clinics were considerable, albeit decreasing over time.
Coinciding with implementation of quality improvement initiative, quality of diabetes care improved significantly in the past 5 years, in part attributable to benefits of integrated multidisciplinary diabetes management.
本研究旨在探讨在基层医疗环境中实施质量改进举措后,2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者的治疗方式是否存在时间趋势,以及糖尿病护理质量是否有所改善。
我们对 202284 名常规接受基层医疗诊所管理的 T2D 患者进行了一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。我们使用多水平逻辑回归,根据患者和诊所特征进行调整,从医管局行政数据中考察了 5 年(2009-2013 年)期间护理质量随时间的变化以及诊所之间的差异。观察期被分为 5 个日历年度。选择了 10 项护理质量标准:7 项护理过程标准(HbA 检测、肾功能检测、全面血脂谱、尿蛋白分析、视网膜筛查、高胆固醇血症患者使用降脂药物以及微量白蛋白尿患者使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂)和 3 项护理结果标准(HbA 水平≤7%、血压≤130/80mmHg 和 LDL-C 水平≤2.6mmol/L)的达标情况。通过使用组内相关系数评估诊所之间标准的差异。
在观察期间,接受基层医疗管理的 T2D 患者的特征发生了重大变化,年龄增长、使用胰岛素和糖尿病病程延长,但代谢指标得到改善(所有 P 趋势<.001)。7 项护理过程和 3 项临床护理结局标准的达标率随时间显著提高(所有 P 趋势<.001)。尽管随着时间的推移,各诊所之间视网膜筛查的实施差异仍然较大。
在过去 5 年中,随着质量改进举措的实施,糖尿病护理质量显著改善,部分归因于综合多学科糖尿病管理的益处。