• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者赋权计划(PEP)对基层医疗中2型糖尿病临床结局及卫生服务利用的影响:一项观察性匹配队列研究

Effects of Patient Empowerment Programme (PEP) on clinical outcomes and health service utilization in type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care: an observational matched cohort study.

作者信息

Wong Carlos K H, Wong William C W, Lam Cindy L K, Wan Y F, Wong Winnie H T, Chung K L, Dai Daisy, Tsui Eva L H, Fong Daniel Y T

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

Integrated Care Programs, Hospital Authority Head Office, Hong Kong Hospital Authority, Kowloon, Hong Kong.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 May 1;9(5):e95328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095328. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0095328
PMID:24788804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4006782/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the effects of a large population-based patient empowerment programme (PEP) on clinical outcomes and health service utilization rates in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients in the primary care setting.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND SUBJECTS

A stratified random sample of 1,141 patients with T2DM enrolled to PEP between March and September 2010 were selected from general outpatient clinics (GOPC) across Hong Kong and compared with an equal number of T2DM patients who had not participated in the PEP (non-PEP group) matched by age, sex and HbA1C level group.

MEASURES

Clinical outcomes of HbA1c, SBP, DBP and LDL-C levels, and health service utilization rates including numbers of visits to GOPC, specialist outpatient clinics (SOPC), emergency department (ED) and inpatient admissions, were measured at baseline and at 12-month post-recruitment. The effects of PEP on clinical outcomes and health service utilization rates were assessed by the difference-in-difference estimation, using the generalized estimating equation models.

RESULTS

Compared with non-PEP group, PEP group achieved additional improvements in clinical outcomes over the 12-month period. A significantly greater percentage of patients in the PEP group attained HbA1C≤7% or LDL-C≤2.6 mmol/L at 12-month follow-up compared with the non-PEP group. PEP group had a mean 0.813 fewer GOPC visits in comparison with the non-PEP group.

CONCLUSIONS

PEP was effective in improving the clinical outcomes and reduced the general outpatient clinic utilization rate over a 12-month period. Empowering T2DM patients on self-management of their disease can enhance the quality of diabetes care in primary care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01935349.

摘要

背景

评估一项基于大量人群的患者赋权计划(PEP)对基层医疗环境中2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者临床结局和医疗服务利用率的影响。

研究设计与对象

从香港各地的普通门诊诊所(GOPC)中选取了2010年3月至9月期间纳入PEP的1141例T2DM患者作为分层随机样本,并与同等数量未参与PEP的T2DM患者(非PEP组)进行比较,后者按年龄、性别和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1C)水平分组进行匹配。

测量指标

在基线和招募后12个月时测量糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平的临床结局,以及医疗服务利用率,包括前往GOPC、专科门诊诊所(SOPC)、急诊科(ED)就诊的次数和住院次数。采用广义估计方程模型,通过差异-in-差异估计法评估PEP对临床结局和医疗服务利用率的影响。

结果

与非PEP组相比,PEP组在12个月期间临床结局有额外改善。在12个月随访时,PEP组达到糖化血红蛋白≤7%或低密度脂蛋白胆固醇≤2.6 mmol/L的患者比例显著高于非PEP组。与非PEP组相比,PEP组前往GOPC就诊的平均次数少0.813次。

结论

PEP在12个月期间有效改善了临床结局并降低了普通门诊诊所的利用率。赋予T2DM患者疾病自我管理的权力可提高基层医疗中糖尿病护理的质量。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01935349。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5dba/4006782/c5aa7858a2ba/pone.0095328.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5dba/4006782/04fea7229323/pone.0095328.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5dba/4006782/c5aa7858a2ba/pone.0095328.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5dba/4006782/04fea7229323/pone.0095328.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5dba/4006782/c5aa7858a2ba/pone.0095328.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of Patient Empowerment Programme (PEP) on clinical outcomes and health service utilization in type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care: an observational matched cohort study.患者赋权计划(PEP)对基层医疗中2型糖尿病临床结局及卫生服务利用的影响:一项观察性匹配队列研究
PLoS One. 2014 May 1;9(5):e95328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095328. eCollection 2014.
2
Patient Empowerment Programme in primary care reduced all-cause mortality and cardiovascular diseases in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a population-based propensity-matched cohort study.初级保健中的患者赋权计划降低了 2 型糖尿病患者的全因死亡率和心血管疾病:一项基于人群的倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Feb;17(2):128-35. doi: 10.1111/dom.12397. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
3
Evaluation of the quality of care of a multi-disciplinary risk factor assessment and management programme (RAMP) for diabetic patients.多学科危险因素评估和管理计划(RAMP)对糖尿病患者的护理质量评估。
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Dec 5;13:116. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-116.
4
Five-year cost-effectiveness of the Patient Empowerment Programme (PEP) for type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care.患者赋权计划(PEP)在初级保健中治疗 2 型糖尿病的 5 年成本效益分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Sep;19(9):1312-1316. doi: 10.1111/dom.12919. Epub 2017 May 5.
5
Increased number of structured diabetes education attendance was not associated with the improvement in patient-reported health-related quality of life: results from Patient Empowerment Programme (PEP).结构化糖尿病教育课程参与次数的增加与患者报告的健康相关生活质量的改善无关:患者赋权计划(PEP)的结果。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Aug 12;13:126. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0324-3.
6
Long-term cost-effectiveness of a Patient Empowerment Programme for type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care.患者授权计划在初级保健中对 2 型糖尿病的长期成本效益分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Jan;21(1):73-83. doi: 10.1111/dom.13485. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
7
A latent profile analysis on patient empowerment programme in a Hong Kong primary care setting.基于香港基层医疗环境的患者赋权项目的潜在剖面分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Oct;100(10):1890-1897. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.05.028. Epub 2017 May 24.
8
Evaluation of patient-reported outcomes data in structured diabetes education intervention: 2-year follow-up data of patient empowerment programme.结构化糖尿病教育干预中患者报告结局数据的评估:患者赋权计划的2年随访数据
Endocrine. 2016 Nov;54(2):422-432. doi: 10.1007/s12020-016-1015-5. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
9
Temporal trends in quality of primary care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A population-based retrospective cohort study after implementation of a quality improvement initiative.2 型糖尿病患者初级保健质量的时间趋势:一项实施质量改进举措后的基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2018 Feb;34(2). doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2952. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
10
Effect of a structured diabetes education programme in primary care on hospitalizations and emergency department visits among people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus: results from the Patient Empowerment Programme.初级保健中结构化糖尿病教育项目对2型糖尿病患者住院和急诊就诊的影响:患者赋权项目的结果
Diabet Med. 2016 Oct;33(10):1427-36. doi: 10.1111/dme.12969. Epub 2015 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
A parallel-group controlled clinical study to evaluate the efficacy of self-family-environment empowerment diet management intervention in improving outcomes for pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus.一项平行组对照临床研究,旨在评估自我家庭环境赋权饮食管理干预对改善妊娠期糖尿病孕妇结局的疗效。
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 13;13:1558273. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1558273. eCollection 2025.
2
Improving diabetes self-management and control through individualized patient counseling: A quasi-experimental study.通过个体化患者咨询改善糖尿病自我管理与控制:一项准实验研究。
J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Oct 28;13:407. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1951_23. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of lifestyle education program for type 2 diabetes patients in clinics: a cluster randomized controlled trial.诊所中 2 型糖尿病患者生活方式教育计划的效果:一项整群随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2013 May 14;13:467. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-467.
2
Evaluation of the quality of care of a multi-disciplinary risk factor assessment and management programme (RAMP) for diabetic patients.多学科危险因素评估和管理计划(RAMP)对糖尿病患者的护理质量评估。
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Dec 5;13:116. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-116.
3
Effectiveness of a diabetes education and self management programme (DESMOND) for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus: three year follow-up of a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care.
Development of diabetes complications within coordinated and structured primary health care: a 10-year retrospective cohort study in Germany.
在协调有序的初级卫生保健体系中糖尿病并发症的发生情况:德国一项为期10年的回顾性队列研究
BJGP Open. 2024 Oct 29;8(3). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0061. Print 2024 Oct.
4
A Mobile App (Concerto) to Empower Hospitalized Patients in a Swiss University Hospital: Development, Design, and Implementation Report.一款助力瑞士大学医院住院患者的移动应用程序(Concerto):开发、设计与实施报告。
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Mar 28;12:e47914. doi: 10.2196/47914.
5
Study protocol of a clinical randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of an innovative Digital thErapy to proMote wEighT loss in patients with obesity by incReasing their Adherence to treatment: the DEMETRA study.一项关于创新数字疗法通过提高肥胖患者治疗依从性促进体重减轻疗效的临床随机对照试验的研究方案:DEMETRA研究
Front Digit Health. 2023 Nov 30;5:1159744. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1159744. eCollection 2023.
6
Identifying Factors that Support the Delivery of Exceptional Care in General Practice and Development of the IDEAL Framework: A Qualitative Study.识别支持一般实践中提供卓越护理的因素和制定 IDEAL 框架:一项定性研究。
Qual Health Res. 2023 Nov;33(13):1232-1248. doi: 10.1177/10497323231197387. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
7
Empowering Self-Efficacy by Using Patient Empowerment among Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Pre-Post-Test Study.在慢性阻塞性肺疾病中通过患者赋权增强自我效能:前后测研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Feb 2;11(3):430. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030430.
8
A nurse-led conceptual model to inform patient-centred, type 2 diabetes mellitus management in public clinical settings.一种由护士主导的概念模型,用于为公共临床环境中以患者为中心的2型糖尿病管理提供信息。
J Res Nurs. 2021 Dec;26(8):763-778. doi: 10.1177/17449871211021137. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
9
Association of personalised care plans with monitoring and control of clinical outcomes, prescription of medication and utilisation of primary care services in patients with type 2 diabetes: an observational real-world study.个性化护理计划与 2 型糖尿病患者临床结局监测和控制、药物处方及基层医疗服务利用的关联:一项观察性真实世界研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2022 Mar;40(1):39-47. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2022.2036458. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
10
Systematic review of patient-engagement interventions: potentials for enhancing person-centred care for older patients with multimorbidity.系统评价患者参与干预措施:增强多病共存老年患者以人 为本护理的潜力。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 16;11(12):e048558. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048558.
新诊断 2 型糖尿病患者糖尿病教育和自我管理计划(DESMOND)的效果:初级保健中一项群组随机对照试验的 3 年随访结果。
BMJ. 2012 Apr 26;344:e2333. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2333.
4
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2012.《糖尿病医疗护理标准——2012》
Diabetes Care. 2012 Jan;35 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S11-63. doi: 10.2337/dc12-s011.
5
The effect of nurse-led diabetes self-management education on glycosylated hemoglobin and cardiovascular risk factors: a meta-analysis.护士主导的糖尿病自我管理教育对糖化血红蛋白和心血管风险因素的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Diabetes Educ. 2012 Jan-Feb;38(1):108-23. doi: 10.1177/0145721711423978. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
6
Quality of diabetes care in public primary care clinics in Hong Kong.香港公营基层医疗诊所的糖尿病护理质量。
Fam Pract. 2012 Apr;29(2):196-202. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmr060. Epub 2011 Sep 2.
7
Delivering the diabetes education and self management for ongoing and newly diagnosed (DESMOND) programme for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: cost effectiveness analysis.为新诊断为 2 型糖尿病的患者提供糖尿病教育和自我管理(DESMOND)计划:成本效益分析。
BMJ. 2010 Aug 20;341:c4093. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c4093.
8
Rethink Organization to iMprove Education and Outcomes (ROMEO): a multicenter randomized trial of lifestyle intervention by group care to manage type 2 diabetes.重新思考组织以改善教育和结果 (ROMEO):一项多中心随机试验,通过小组护理进行生活方式干预来管理 2 型糖尿病。
Diabetes Care. 2010 Apr;33(4):745-7. doi: 10.2337/dc09-2024. Epub 2010 Jan 26.
9
Prospective randomized controlled trial to evaluate effectiveness of registered dietitian-led diabetes management on glycemic and diet control in a primary care setting in Taiwan.前瞻性随机对照试验评估注册营养师主导的糖尿病管理对台湾初级保健环境中血糖和饮食控制的有效性。
Diabetes Care. 2010 Feb;33(2):233-9. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1092. Epub 2009 Nov 12.
10
Self-management support in "real-world" settings: an empowerment-based intervention.“真实世界”环境中的自我管理支持:基于赋权的干预。
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 May;79(2):178-84. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.029. Epub 2009 Nov 3.