• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新型白介素抑制剂治疗银屑病关节炎的疗效和安全性的系统评价和荟萃分析。

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Novel Interleukin Inhibitors in the Management of Psoriatic Arthritis.

出版信息

J Clin Rheumatol. 2018 Jan;24(1):6-13. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000000583.

DOI:10.1097/RHU.0000000000000583
PMID:28926467
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to systemically review the efficacy and safety of inhibitors of interleukin 6 (IL-6): clazakizumab, IL-12/23: ustekinumab, and IL-17A: secukinumab, brodalumab, and ixekizumab in psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

METHODS

The literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science. We included randomized controlled trials that assessed the efficacy of IL inhibitors and reported American College of Rheumatology 20 response at 24 weeks. Meta-analysis was done using random-effects model utilizing the DerSimonian and Laird method. Quality assessment was done using RobotReviewer Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Assessment Tool. Heterogeneity was assessed with Q statistic and quantified with I. Publication bias was assessed with a funnel plot.

RESULTS

Eight studies including 2722 subjects demonstrate the efficacy of IL inhibitors clazakizumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, and ustekinumab in the treatment of PsA. The American College of Rheumatology 20/50/70 risk ratios were 2.02 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65-2.47; P = 0.000), 2.95 (95% CI, 2.32-3.73; P = 0.00), and 5.14 (95% CI, 3.28-8.06; P = 0.00), respectively, in favor of treatment versus placebo. There was no evidence of significant heterogeneity between trials. Subgroup analysis showed efficacy in patients who were tumor necrosis factor naive, as well as tumor necrosis factor nonresponders or inadequate responders. The number of adverse events was higher in the treatment groups versus placebo, the majority were mild and did not require treatment adjustment (risk ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.06-1.28; P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in drug withdrawals.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis shows that the inhibitors of IL-6 (clazakizumab), IL-12/23 (ustekinumab), and IL-17A (secukinumab, brodalumab, ixekizumab) are efficacious and generally well tolerated when used to treat patients with PsA.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在系统评价白细胞介素 6(IL-6)抑制剂:克拉izumab、IL-12/23:乌司奴单抗和 IL-17A:司库珠单抗、布罗达umab 和依奇珠单抗治疗银屑病关节炎(PsA)的疗效和安全性。

方法

使用 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆、Scopus 和 Web of Science 进行文献检索。我们纳入了评估 IL 抑制剂疗效并报告 24 周美国风湿病学会 20 反应的随机对照试验。使用随机效应模型和 DerSimonian 和 Laird 方法进行荟萃分析。使用 RobotReviewer Cochrane 偏倚风险评估工具进行质量评估。使用 Q 统计量评估异质性,并用量化 I 表示。使用漏斗图评估发表偏倚。

结果

八项研究共纳入 2722 例受试者,证明了 IL-6 抑制剂克拉izumab、司库珠单抗、依奇珠单抗、布罗达umab 和乌司奴单抗在治疗 PsA 中的疗效。美国风湿病学会 20/50/70 风险比分别为 2.02(95%置信区间[CI],1.65-2.47;P=0.000)、2.95(95%CI,2.32-3.73;P=0.00)和 5.14(95%CI,3.28-8.06;P=0.00),均有利于治疗组与安慰剂组相比。各试验之间无明显异质性。亚组分析显示,在肿瘤坏死因子初治患者以及肿瘤坏死因子无应答或应答不足的患者中,疗效显著。与安慰剂组相比,治疗组不良反应发生率较高,但多数为轻度,无需调整治疗(风险比,1.17;95%CI,1.06-1.28;P=0.001)。药物停药率无显著差异。

结论

我们的荟萃分析表明,白细胞介素 6(克拉izumab)、白细胞介素 12/23(乌司奴单抗)和白细胞介素 17A(司库珠单抗、布罗达umab、依奇珠单抗)抑制剂在治疗银屑病关节炎患者时具有疗效,且通常耐受性良好。

相似文献

1
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Novel Interleukin Inhibitors in the Management of Psoriatic Arthritis.一种新型白介素抑制剂治疗银屑病关节炎的疗效和安全性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Rheumatol. 2018 Jan;24(1):6-13. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000000583.
2
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块型银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 23;5(5):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub5.
3
Comparative effectiveness of abatacept, apremilast, secukinumab and ustekinumab treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.阿巴西普、阿普米司特、司库奇尤单抗和乌司奴单抗治疗银屑病关节炎的疗效比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Rheumatol Int. 2018 Feb;38(2):189-201. doi: 10.1007/s00296-017-3919-7. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
4
Risk of new-onset inflammatory bowel disease in psoriasis patients treated with five different interleukin inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.接受五种不同白细胞介素抑制剂治疗的银屑病患者新发炎症性肠病的风险:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Immunol. 2025 Jun 4;16:1594998. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1594998. eCollection 2025.
5
Etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and economic evaluation.依那西普和英夫利昔单抗治疗银屑病关节炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(31):iii-iv, xiii-xvi, 1-239. doi: 10.3310/hta10310.
6
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
7
Does previous use of tumour necrosis inhibitors change the therapeutic effect of interleukin (IL)-17 or IL-12/23 inhibitors on psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis? Results of a systematic review.既往使用肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂是否会改变白细胞介素(IL)-17 或 IL-12/23 抑制剂治疗银屑病和银屑病关节炎的疗效?系统评价的结果。
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2022 Sep;47(9):1627-1635. doi: 10.1111/ced.15237. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
8
Topical clonidine for neuropathic pain in adults.局部用可乐定治疗成人神经病理性疼痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 19;5(5):CD010967. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010967.pub3.
9
Antidepressants for depression in adults with HIV infection.用于感染HIV的成年抑郁症患者的抗抑郁药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 22;1(1):CD008525. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008525.pub3.
10
Does current evidence on disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for psoriatic arthritis reinforce an effect on radiographic progression? Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis.当前关于治疗银屑病关节炎的疾病修正抗风湿药物的证据是否加强了其对放射学进展的作用?系统评价和荟萃分析的结果。
Clin Rheumatol. 2021 Sep;40(9):3499-3510. doi: 10.1007/s10067-021-05622-w. Epub 2021 Feb 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-world effectiveness and persistence of secukinumab in the treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis.司库奇尤单抗治疗银屑病关节炎患者的真实世界有效性及持久性
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Nov 20;10:1294247. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1294247. eCollection 2023.
2
Autoreactive T-Cells in Psoriasis: Are They Spoiled Tregs and Can Therapies Restore Their Functions?银屑病中的自身反应性 T 细胞:它们是受损的 Tregs 吗?治疗可以恢复其功能吗?
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Feb 22;24(5):4348. doi: 10.3390/ijms24054348.
3
Interleukin 6: A biomarker for COVID-19 progression.
白细胞介素6:新冠病毒疾病进展的生物标志物。
Mater Today Proc. 2023;72:3351-3355. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.07.387. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
4
Targeted systemic therapies for psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and comparative synthesis of short-term articular, dermatological, enthesitis and dactylitis outcomes.靶向治疗银屑病关节炎的系统评价:短期关节、皮肤、附着点炎和指(趾)炎结局的比较综合分析。
RMD Open. 2022 Mar;8(1). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-002074.
5
Brazilian Society of Rheumatology 2020 guidelines for psoriatic arthritis.巴西风湿病学会 2020 年银屑病关节炎治疗指南。
Adv Rheumatol. 2021 Nov 24;61(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s42358-021-00219-y.
6
Interleukin-6 Perpetrator of the COVID-19 Cytokine Storm.白细胞介素-6:新冠病毒细胞因子风暴的元凶
Indian J Clin Biochem. 2021 Oct;36(4):440-450. doi: 10.1007/s12291-021-00989-8. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
7
Cycling or swap biologics and small molecules in psoriatic arthritis: Observations from a real-life single center cohort.在银屑病关节炎中交替使用生物制剂和小分子药物进行治疗:来自真实单中心队列的观察结果。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Apr 23;100(16):e25300. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025300.
8
Efficacy and safety of IL-17 inhibitors for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.IL-17 抑制剂治疗强直性脊柱炎的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 May 12;22(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02208-w.
9
Efficacy and safety of biologics in psoriatic arthritis: a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis.生物制剂治疗银屑病关节炎的疗效和安全性:系统文献回顾和网络荟萃分析。
RMD Open. 2020 Feb;6(1). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001117.
10
Risk of Infections and Cancer in Patients With Rheumatologic Diseases Receiving Interleukin Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.患有风湿性疾病的患者接受白细胞介素抑制剂治疗的感染和癌症风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1913102. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.13102.