Banks Lena Morgon, Kelly Susan A, Kyegombe Nambusi, Kuper Hannah, Devries Karen
International Centre for Evidence in Disability, Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Gender Violence and Health Centre, Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene &Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 19;12(9):e0183736. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183736. eCollection 2017.
There is growing evidence that children with disabilities face an increased risk of violence globally. While child protection mechanisms to prevent and respond to violence-including formal government systems and more informal programmes and activities run by local communities or NGOs-are slowly becoming operationalised in low- and- middle-income countries, little is known about whether existing mechanisms are disability-inclusive. The aim of this study is to provide a better understanding of children with disabilities' experiences of violence and their access to available child protection mechanisms in low resource settings.
This study was conducted in Kasungu and Mulanje districts in Malawi and Kamuli district in Uganda between October-December 2015. In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with approximately 20 purposively selected child/caregiver pairs in each country (43 pairs total). Interviews with key informants involved in the provision of child protection and disability support were also conducted. All interviews were recorded, transcribed and coded in NVivo. Thematic Analysis, complemented by constant comparison as described in Grounded Theory, was used to analyse the data.
Almost all children with disabilities reported experiencing violence, with verbal abuse and bullying the most common forms. Very few of these children sought recourse through available child protection mechanisms. Some of the key factors impeding access to child protection for children with disabilities included: lack of local government disability-inclusive planning and budgeting; centralization of limited disability and social protection services; financial barriers to seeking and receiving care; and stigma and negative attitudes toward disabilities.
Children with disabilities face both high levels of violence and high barriers to accessing available child protection mechanisms. There is an urgent need to ensure that all efforts to prevent and respond to violence against children are more disability-inclusive. In addition, it may be appropriate to target child protection mechanisms specifically toward children with disabilities because of the different and intersecting vulnerabilities that they face.
越来越多的证据表明,全球范围内残疾儿童面临的暴力风险在增加。虽然预防和应对暴力的儿童保护机制——包括正式的政府系统以及由当地社区或非政府组织开展的更非正式的项目和活动——在低收入和中等收入国家正逐渐开始运作,但对于现有机制是否包含残疾儿童,人们知之甚少。本研究的目的是更好地了解在资源匮乏环境中残疾儿童遭受暴力的经历以及他们获得现有儿童保护机制的情况。
本研究于2015年10月至12月在马拉维的卡松古和穆兰杰区以及乌干达的卡穆利区进行。在每个国家,对约20对有目的地挑选出的儿童/照料者进行了深入的半结构化访谈(共43对)。还对参与提供儿童保护和残疾支持的关键信息提供者进行了访谈。所有访谈都进行了录音、转录并在NVivo中编码。采用主题分析,并辅之以扎根理论中描述的持续比较法来分析数据。
几乎所有残疾儿童都报告曾遭受暴力,言语虐待和欺凌是最常见的形式。这些儿童中很少有人通过现有的儿童保护机制寻求补救。阻碍残疾儿童获得儿童保护的一些关键因素包括:地方政府缺乏包含残疾儿童的规划和预算;有限的残疾和社会保护服务集中化;寻求和接受照料的经济障碍;以及对残疾的污名化和负面态度。
残疾儿童面临着高水平的暴力,同时在获得现有儿童保护机制方面也面临巨大障碍。迫切需要确保所有预防和应对暴力侵害儿童行为的努力都更具残疾儿童包容性。此外,鉴于残疾儿童面临不同且相互交织的脆弱性,可能有必要针对残疾儿童专门设立儿童保护机制。