Pinna Samantha, Tusconi Massimo, Atzeni Michela, Perra Alessandra, Leonetti Valerio, Cossu Giulia, Primavera Diego, Mereu Noemi Maria, Petretto Donatella Rita, Preti Antonio, Pelosin Elisa, Eskin Mehmet, Migliaccio Gian Mario, Carta Mauro Giovanni, Sancassiani Federica
Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy.
University Hospital of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy.
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2025 Jan 16;21:e17450179360265. doi: 10.2174/0117450179360265250113081501. eCollection 2025.
The present study aims to evaluate the preliminary content and face validity of the Perceptions on the Implementation of the CRPD in muniCIpalities Questionnaire (PICI-Q)," a self-report questionnaire built to assess the perceptions on how effectively municipalities implement the CRPD principles concerning social inclusion and participation of persons with disabilities in municipalities.
A two-step Delphi methodology was used to build the questionnaire and assess its content and face validity. A group including health professionals, academics, experts in psychometrics, persons with disabilities and local policymakers was involved in building the questionnaire according to the CRPD articles regarding social inclusion and active participation of persons with disabilities. Two pools of experts assessed the content and face validity and lay stakeholders, respectively.
An average content validity index of 0.95 was obtained, with no items removed. Regarding face validity, all items achieved high scores, ranging from 17 to 21, with a face validity index of 0.95.
The PICI-Q is a promising tool for assessing perceptions of CRPD implementation in municipalities. Its robust preliminary validation suggests it could support local authorities in designing and improving policies and interventions aligned with the CRPD principles of social inclusion and participation for persons with disabilities.
本研究旨在评估《城市中〈残疾人权利公约〉实施情况认知调查问卷》(PICI-Q)的初步内容效度和表面效度。该自填式问卷旨在评估城市在有效实施《残疾人权利公约》中关于残疾人社会包容和参与原则方面的认知情况。
采用两步德尔菲法构建问卷并评估其内容效度和表面效度。根据《残疾人权利公约》中关于残疾人社会包容和积极参与的条款,一个由卫生专业人员、学者、心理测量学专家、残疾人及地方政策制定者组成的小组参与了问卷的构建。两组专家分别评估了内容效度和表面效度以及普通利益相关者的看法。
获得的平均内容效度指数为0.95,无项目被删除。关于表面效度,所有项目得分都很高,从17分到21分不等,表面效度指数为0.95。
PICI-Q是评估城市中《残疾人权利公约》实施情况认知的一个有前景的工具。其有力的初步验证表明,它可以支持地方当局制定和改进与《残疾人权利公约》中残疾人社会包容和参与原则相一致的政策和干预措施。