• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

打屁股与儿童发展:我们现在知道的已经足够多,足以停止打孩子了。

Spanking and Child Development: We Know Enough Now To Stop Hitting Our Children.

作者信息

Gershoff Elizabeth T

机构信息

Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Texas at Austin.

出版信息

Child Dev Perspect. 2013 Sep 1;7(3):133-137. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12038.

DOI:10.1111/cdep.12038
PMID:24039629
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3768154/
Abstract

Spanking remains a common, if controversial, childrearing practice in the United States. In this article, I pair mounting research indicating that spanking is both ineffective and harmful with professional and human rights opinions disavowing the practice. I conclude that spanking is a form of violence against children that should no longer be a part of American childrearing.

摘要

在美国,打屁股仍然是一种常见的育儿方式,尽管存在争议。在本文中,我将越来越多表明打屁股既无效又有害的研究与摒弃这种做法的专业和人权观点结合起来。我得出的结论是,打屁股是一种针对儿童的暴力形式,不应再成为美国育儿方式的一部分。

相似文献

1
Spanking and Child Development: We Know Enough Now To Stop Hitting Our Children.打屁股与儿童发展:我们现在知道的已经足够多,足以停止打孩子了。
Child Dev Perspect. 2013 Sep 1;7(3):133-137. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12038.
2
Associations between spanking beliefs and reported spanking among adolescents-parent/caregiver dyads in a Canadian sample.在加拿大样本中,打屁股信念与青少年-父母/照顾者对子代被打屁股报告之间的关联。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 12;22(1):493. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12856-z.
3
Child Abuse, Spanking and Adult Dating Violence: A Replication Study of Temple et al., 2018.儿童虐待、打屁股与成人约会暴力:对 Temple 等人,2018 年研究的复制研究。
Psychiatr Q. 2020 Sep;91(3):835-840. doi: 10.1007/s11126-020-09742-5.
4
Multilevel ecological analysis of the predictors of spanking across 65 countries.对 65 个国家打屁股行为预测因素的多层次生态分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 10;11(8):e046075. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046075.
5
Trust in expert versus lay comments in online articles about spanking and car seat safety.对打屁股和汽车安全座椅相关在线文章中专家与非专业人士评论的信任。
J Fam Psychol. 2021 Apr;35(3):399-409. doi: 10.1037/fam0000784. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
6
Medical center staff attitudes about spanking.医疗中心工作人员对打屁股的态度。
Child Abuse Negl. 2016 Nov;61:55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
7
Speak softly--and forget the stick. Corporal punishment and child physical abuse.轻声细语——摒弃棍棒。体罚与儿童身体虐待。
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Oct;35(4):364-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.06.031.
8
Spanking and young children's socioemotional development in low- and middle-income countries.打屁股与中低收入国家幼儿的社会情绪发展。
Child Abuse Negl. 2019 Feb;88:84-95. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.11.003. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
9
Does community violence exposure moderate the associations between maternal spanking and early child behavior problems?社区暴力暴露是否会调节母亲打屁股与幼儿行为问题之间的关系?
Aggress Behav. 2020 May;46(3):210-219. doi: 10.1002/ab.21882. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
10
Opinions about child corporal punishment and influencing factors.关于儿童体罚的意见和影响因素。
J Interpers Violence. 2012 Jul;27(11):2208-29. doi: 10.1177/0886260511432154. Epub 2012 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
#GentleParenting: Critiquing the "fifth shift" of intensive mothering in the "pandemic afterlives".# 温和育儿:批判“大流行后遗症”中密集育儿的“第五次转变”
Fem Psychol. 2025 Apr 4;35(3):343-363. doi: 10.1177/09593535251327891. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Spare the Dog, Hit the Child: Preliminary Findings Regarding Parents' Beliefs About Spanking and Hitting Children.放过狗,打孩子:关于父母对打屁股和殴打孩子的看法的初步调查结果
Psychol Violence. 2025 Jan;15(1):76-84. doi: 10.1037/vio0000535. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
3
Understanding the influence of socioeconomic status on children physical disciplinary practices in Bangladeshi households.了解社会经济地位对孟加拉国家庭中儿童体罚行为的影响。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 10;20(4):e0320239. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320239. eCollection 2025.
4
Effects of family socioeconomic status on the self-expectations of children under grandparenting in China.中国家庭社会经济地位对留守儿童自我期望的影响。
Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 12;13:1479965. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1479965. eCollection 2025.
5
Are school-based violence prevention interventions inclusive and effective for children with disabilities? A systematic review of global evidence.以学校为基础的暴力预防干预措施对残疾儿童是否具有包容性且有效?全球证据的系统评价。
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Jan 17;80:103060. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103060. eCollection 2025 Feb.
6
Play Nicely: Evaluation of a Brief Intervention to Reduce Physical Punishment and the Beliefs That Justify It.友好相处:一项减少体罚及其正当理由信念的简短干预措施的评估
Children (Basel). 2024 May 20;11(5):608. doi: 10.3390/children11050608.
7
The impact of coercive and assertive communication styles on children's perception of chores: an experimental investigation.强制与坚定沟通方式对儿童家务观念的影响:一项实验研究。
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 6;15:1266417. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1266417. eCollection 2024.
8
Researchers Deserve a Better Critique: Response to.研究人员应得到更好的批评:对……的回应
Marriage Fam Rev. 2017;53(5):465-490. doi: 10.1080/01494929.2017.1308899. Epub 2017 May 1.
9
Examining the Longitudinal Effect of Spanking on Young Latinx Child Behavior Problems.探究打屁股对拉丁裔幼儿行为问题的长期影响。
J Child Fam Stud. 2020 Nov;29(11):3080-3090. doi: 10.1007/s10826-020-01818-x. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
10
Using Non-Violent Discipline Tools: Evidence Suggesting the Importance of Attunement.使用非暴力纪律工具:调谐重要性的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Dec 15;20(24):7187. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20247187.

本文引用的文献

1
MORE HARM THAN GOOD: A SUMMARY OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH ON THE INTENDED AND UNINTENDED EFFECTS OF CORPORAL PUNISHMENT ON CHILDREN.弊大于利:关于体罚对儿童预期及非预期影响的科学研究综述
Law Contemp Probl. 2010 Spring;73(2):31-56.
2
Does warmth moderate longitudinal associations between maternal spanking and child aggression in early childhood?温暖会缓和母亲打屁股与儿童早期攻击行为之间的纵向关联吗?
Dev Psychol. 2013 Nov;49(11):2017-28. doi: 10.1037/a0031630. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
3
Longitudinal links between spanking and children's externalizing behaviors in a national sample of White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian American families.纵向研究:打屁股与美国家庭中白种人、黑种人、西班牙裔和亚裔美国人孩子外化问题之间的关系。
Child Dev. 2012 May-Jun;83(3):838-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01732.x. Epub 2012 Feb 3.
4
NAPNAP position statement on corporal punishment.国家儿科护士执业协会关于体罚的立场声明。
J Pediatr Health Care. 2011 Nov-Dec;25(6):e31-2.
5
Parent discipline practices in an international sample: associations with child behaviors and moderation by perceived normativeness.国际样本中的父母纪律实践:与儿童行为的关联及感知规范性的调节作用。
Child Dev. 2010 Mar-Apr;81(2):487-502. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01409.x.
6
Correlates and consequences of spanking and verbal punishment for low-income white, african american, and mexican american toddlers.打屁股和言语惩罚与低收入白种人、非裔美国人和墨西哥裔美国幼儿的相关性及其后果。
Child Dev. 2009 Sep-Oct;80(5):1403-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01341.x.
7
Reciprocal influences between maternal discipline techniques and aggression in children and adolescents.母亲管教方式与儿童及青少年攻击行为之间的相互影响。
Aggress Behav. 2008 May-Jun;34(3):245-55. doi: 10.1002/ab.20241.
8
Use of harsh physical discipline and developmental outcomes in adolescence.青少年时期严厉体罚的使用与发育结果
Dev Psychopathol. 2007 Winter;19(1):227-42. doi: 10.1017/S0954579407070125.
9
Parents' discipline of young children: results from the National Survey of Early Childhood Health.幼儿父母的管教方式:来自全国幼儿健康调查的结果。
Pediatrics. 2004 Jun;113(6 Suppl):1952-8.
10
Ordinary physical punishment: is it harmful? Comment on Gershoff (2002).普通体罚:有害吗?对格肖夫(2002年)的评论
Psychol Bull. 2002 Jul;128(4):580-9; discussion 602-11. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.580.