Department of Midwifery Science, AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Queen's Medical Centre, Division of Midwifery, School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2HA, UK.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 18;19(3):1046. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031046.
An effective system of risk selection is a global necessity to ensure women and children receive appropriate care at the right time and at the right place. To gain more insight into the existing models of risk selection (MRS), we explored the distribution of different MRS across regions in The Netherlands, and examined the relation between MRS and primary care midwives' and obstetricians' satisfaction with different MRS. We conducted a nationwide survey amongst all primary midwifery care practices and obstetrics departments. The questionnaire was completed by 312 (55%) primary midwifery care practices and 53 (72%) obstetrics departments. We identified three MRS, which were distributed differently across regions: (1) primary care midwives assess risk and initiate a consultation or transfer of care without discussing this first with the obstetrician, (2) primary care midwives assess risk and make decisions about consultation or transfer of care collaboratively with obstetricians, and (3) models with other characteristics. Across these MRS, variations exist in several aspects, including the routine involvement of the obstetrician in the care of healthy pregnant women. We found no significant difference between MRS and professionals' level of satisfaction. An evidence- and value-based approach is recommended in the pursuit of the optimal organization of risk selection. This requires further research into associations between MRS and maternal and perinatal outcomes, professional payment methods, resource allocation, and the experiences of women and care professionals.
有效的风险选择体系是全球范围内的必要条件,以确保妇女和儿童在适当的时间和地点获得适当的护理。为了更深入地了解现有的风险选择模型(MRS),我们探讨了荷兰不同地区 MRS 的分布情况,并研究了 MRS 与初级保健助产士和产科医生对不同 MRS 的满意度之间的关系。我们在所有初级助产护理实践和产科部门进行了一项全国性调查。共有 312 个(55%)初级助产护理实践和 53 个(72%)产科部门完成了问卷。我们确定了三种 MRS,它们在不同地区的分布情况不同:(1)初级保健助产士评估风险并发起咨询或护理转移,而不首先与产科医生讨论,(2)初级保健助产士与产科医生合作评估风险并做出咨询或转移护理的决策,以及(3)具有其他特征的模型。在这些 MRS 中,存在几个方面的差异,包括产科医生常规参与健康孕妇的护理。我们没有发现 MRS 和专业人员满意度之间存在显著差异。建议在追求最佳风险选择组织的过程中采用基于证据和价值的方法。这需要进一步研究 MRS 与母婴和围产期结局、专业人员薪酬方法、资源分配以及妇女和护理专业人员的体验之间的关系。