Mubeen Syed Muhammad, Ghayas Rabia, Adil Rizvi Syed Hasan, Khan Sohaib Ahmed
Department of Community Health Sciences, Hamdard College of Medicine and Dentistry, Hamdard University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Department of Medicine, Shalamar Hospital Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2017 May-Aug;30(2):140-145. doi: 10.4103/efh.EfH_221_16.
Publication is a central element in research dissemination and scientific misconduct in publication is relatively ignored in biomedical research. This study is to assess the knowledge of scientific misconduct in publication among private and public sector medical students.
A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was carried in four (two public and two private) medical colleges of Karachi in 2015. After ethical approval, data were collected through convenient sampling and analyzed in SPSS 16.0. Descriptive statistics was used to summarize the data and Chi-square test was used for cross tabulation with sex, type of medical colleges, and knowledge of scientific misconduct in publication.
A total of 592 medical students participated with mean age of 22.2 ± 1.47 years. The majority (491, 79%) of medical students had heard about the word "publication ethics," higher among public sector students than from private sector (P < 0.001). Only 78 (13.2%) reported to had published original articles, and 64 (10.8%) and 53 (9%) medical students had heard of "ICMJE authorship criteria" and "COPE," respectively. Knowledge about fabrication of data and scientific misconduct in publication was found to be statistically significant (P < 0.05) among males than female students. Statistically significant differences were also observed between public and private medical students for knowledge regarding salami slicing, ghost author, fabrication, and photomanipulation (P < 0.001) and for plagiarism (P < 0.005). Participants from public sector colleges scored significantly better in all above variables than private medical colleges except knowledge about salami slicing in which participants from latter performed significantly better than public sector students.
The study demonstrates deficiencies in knowledge regarding several aspects of publication ethics among medical students of both public and private medical colleges in Karachi. There is a need to increase the awareness of research and publication ethics among students during their academic years.
发表是研究传播的核心要素,而生物医学研究中发表方面的科学不端行为相对被忽视。本研究旨在评估公立和私立部门医学生对发表中的科学不端行为的认知。
2015年在卡拉奇的四所(两所公立和两所私立)医学院开展了一项基于问卷的横断面研究。经伦理批准后,通过便利抽样收集数据,并在SPSS 16.0中进行分析。描述性统计用于汇总数据,卡方检验用于按性别、医学院类型和发表中的科学不端行为知识进行交叉制表。
共有592名医学生参与,平均年龄为22.2±1.47岁。大多数(491名,79%)医学生听说过“发表伦理”一词,公立部门学生中的知晓率高于私立部门(P<0.001)。只有78名(13.2%)报告发表过原创文章,64名(10.8%)和53名(9%)医学生分别听说过“国际医学期刊编辑委员会(ICMJE)作者资格标准”和“出版伦理委员会(COPE)”。发现男生对数据编造和发表中的科学不端行为的认知在统计学上显著高于女生(P<0.05)。公立和私立医学生在腊肠切片、挂名作者、编造和照片处理方面的知识(P<0.001)以及剽窃方面的知识(P<0.005)也存在统计学显著差异。除了在腊肠切片知识方面私立医学院的参与者表现显著优于公立部门学生外,公立医学院的参与者在上述所有变量上的得分均显著高于私立医学院。
该研究表明卡拉奇公立和私立医学院的医学生在发表伦理的几个方面存在知识缺陷。有必要在学生的学术生涯中提高他们对研究和发表伦理的认识。