• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

打击科研不端行为:专题研讨会在改变对抄袭态度方面的作用。

Combating Scientific Misconduct: The Role of Focused Workshops in Changing Attitudes Towards Plagiarism.

作者信息

Rathore Farooq A, Fatima Noor E, Farooq Fareeha, Mansoor Sahibzada N

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, PNS Shifa Hospital, DHA II, Karachi 75500, Pakistan.

Department of Medicine, CMH Lahore Medical College and Institute of Dentistry, Shami Road, Lahore Cantt.

出版信息

Cureus. 2018 May 28;10(5):e2698. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2698.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.2698
PMID:30062072
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6063377/
Abstract

Introduction Scientific misconduct is a global issue. There is low awareness among health professionals regarding plagiarism, particularly in developing countries, including Pakistan. There is no formal training in the ethical conduct of research or writing for under- and post-graduate students in the majority of medical schools in Pakistan. Internet access to published literature has made plagiarism easy. The aim of this study was to document the effectiveness of focused workshops on reducing scientific misconduct as measured using a modified version of the attitude towards plagiarism questionnaire (ATPQ) assessment tool. Materials and methods A cross-sectional study was conducted with participants of workshops on scientific misconduct. Demographic data were recorded. A modified ATPQ was used as a pre- and post-test for workshop participants. Data were entered in SPSS v20 (IBM< Armonk, NY, US). Frequencies and descriptive statistics were analyzed. An independent sample t-test was run to analyze differences in mean scores on pre-workshop ATPQ and differences in mean scores on post-test scores. Results There were 38 males and 42 females (mean age: 26.2 years) who participated in the workshops and completed the pre- and post-assessments. Most (59; 73.75%) were final-year medical students. One-third (33.8%) of the respondents had neither attended workshops related to ethics in medical research nor published manuscripts in medical journals (32.5%). More than half (55%) admitted witnessing unethical practices in research. There was a significant improvement in attitudes toward plagiarism after attending the workshop (mean difference = 7.18 (6.2), t = 10.32, P < .001). Conclusions Focused workshops on how to detect and avoid scientific misconduct can help increase knowledge and improve attitudes towards plagiarism, as assessed by the modified ATPQ. Students, residents, and faculty members must be trained to conduct ethical medical research and avoid all forms of scientific misconduct.

摘要

引言

科学不端行为是一个全球性问题。卫生专业人员对抄袭的认识较低,尤其是在包括巴基斯坦在内的发展中国家。巴基斯坦大多数医学院校的本科生和研究生都没有接受过关于研究或写作道德规范的正规培训。通过互联网获取已发表文献使得抄袭变得容易。本研究的目的是使用修改后的抄袭态度问卷(ATPQ)评估工具,记录聚焦研讨会在减少科学不端行为方面的有效性。

材料与方法

对参加科学不端行为研讨会的人员进行了横断面研究。记录了人口统计学数据。使用修改后的ATPQ作为研讨会参与者的前后测试。数据录入SPSS v20(IBM,美国纽约州阿蒙克)。分析了频率和描述性统计数据。进行独立样本t检验,以分析研讨会前ATPQ平均得分的差异以及测试后得分的平均差异。

结果

共有38名男性和42名女性(平均年龄:26.2岁)参加了研讨会并完成了前后评估。大多数(59人;73.75%)是医学专业最后一年的学生。三分之一(33.8%)的受访者既没有参加过医学研究伦理相关的研讨会,也没有在医学期刊上发表过手稿(32.5%)。超过一半(55%)的人承认目睹过研究中的不道德行为。参加研讨会后,对抄袭的态度有了显著改善(平均差异=7.18(6.2),t=10.32,P<.001)。

结论

如修改后的ATPQ所评估的,关于如何发现和避免科学不端行为的聚焦研讨会有助于增加知识并改善对抄袭的态度。必须对学生、住院医师和教职员工进行培训,以开展符合伦理的医学研究并避免所有形式的科学不端行为。

相似文献

1
Combating Scientific Misconduct: The Role of Focused Workshops in Changing Attitudes Towards Plagiarism.打击科研不端行为:专题研讨会在改变对抄袭态度方面的作用。
Cureus. 2018 May 28;10(5):e2698. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2698.
2
Exploring the attitudes of medical faculty members and students in Pakistan towards plagiarism: a cross sectional survey.探究巴基斯坦医学教员和学生对抄袭的态度:一项横断面调查。
PeerJ. 2015 Jun 18;3:e1031. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1031. eCollection 2015.
3
Attitudes towards plagiarism among academics of the faculty of Medicine of Tunis.突尼斯医学院学者对剽窃的态度。
Account Res. 2020 Nov;27(8):521-537. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2020.1780426. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
4
Knowledge of scientific misconduct in publication among medical students.医学生对发表中的科研不端行为的认知。
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2017 May-Aug;30(2):140-145. doi: 10.4103/efh.EfH_221_16.
5
Extent of awareness and attitudes on plagiarism among post-graduate resident doctors and junior medical faculty in India: a cross-sectional, multicentric study.印度研究生住院医师和初级医学教师对剽窃的认知和态度的程度:一项横断面、多中心研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 16;11(6):e046904. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046904.
6
Self-reported attitudes and behaviours of medical students in Pakistan regarding academic misconduct: a cross-sectional study.巴基斯坦医学生对学术不端行为的自我报告态度和行为:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2014 May 29;15:43. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-43.
7
Assessment of the knowledge and attitudes of the Iranian medical faculty toward plagiarism.评估伊朗医学教师对剽窃的知识和态度。
Account Res. 2024 Dec;31(1):38-55. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2083961. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
8
Survey on attitude of dental professionals about plagiarism in Maharashtra, India.印度马哈拉施特拉邦牙科专业人员对抄袭行为态度的调查。
Perspect Clin Res. 2019 Jan-Mar;10(1):9-14. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_141_17.
9
Attitude, practice orientation, benefits and barriers towards health research and publications among medical practitioners in Abia State, Nigeria: A cross-sectional study.尼日利亚阿比亚州医学从业者对健康研究及出版物的态度、实践导向、益处与障碍:一项横断面研究。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 Feb;23(2):129-137. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_284_18.
10
The Cultural Context of Plagiarism and Research Misconduct in the Asian Region.亚洲地区学术不端和剽窃行为的文化背景。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Mar 27;38(12):e88. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e88.

引用本文的文献

1
Pedagogic Strategies and Contents in Medical Writing/Publishing Education: A Comprehensive Systematic Survey.医学写作/出版教育中的教学策略与内容:一项全面的系统调查
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024 Sep 2;14(9):2491-2508. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14090165.
2
Impact of Performing Medical Writing/Publishing Workshops: A Systematic Survey and Meta-Analysis.开展医学写作/出版工作坊的影响:一项系统调查与荟萃分析
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024 Aug 10;11:23821205241269378. doi: 10.1177/23821205241269378. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
3
Reviewing Academic Integrity: Assessing the Influence of Corrective Measures on Adverse Attitudes and Plagiaristic Behavior.审视学术诚信:评估纠正措施对负面态度和抄袭行为的影响。
J Acad Ethics. 2022 Dec 29:1-22. doi: 10.1007/s10805-022-09467-z.
4
Training on anti-plagiarism and referencing: A step toward sensitizing and improving scientific authenticity in medical literature writing among academicians.反剽窃与参考文献引用培训:迈向提高院士医学文献写作科学可信度的一步。
Perspect Clin Res. 2022 Oct-Dec;13(4):211-212. doi: 10.4103/picr.picr_260_21. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
5
Reliability and validation of an attitude scale regarding responsible conduct in research.研究行为负责任态度量表的信度和效度。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 16;17(3):e0265392. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265392. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Knowledge of scientific misconduct in publication among medical students.医学生对发表中的科研不端行为的认知。
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2017 May-Aug;30(2):140-145. doi: 10.4103/efh.EfH_221_16.
2
Redundant publication and salami slicing: the significance of splitting data.重复发表与切香肠式发表:拆分数据的意义。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017 Aug;59(8):775. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13485.
3
Whistle-blowing process in healthcare: From suspicion to action.医疗保健中的举报流程:从怀疑到行动。
Nurs Ethics. 2019 Mar;26(2):526-540. doi: 10.1177/0969733017705005. Epub 2017 May 11.
4
The race for publishing original biomedical research articles in Pakistan.在巴基斯坦发表原创生物医学研究文章的竞争。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2017 Jan;67(1):1-2.
5
Plagiarism in nursing education: an integrative review.护理教育中的抄袭现象:一项综合综述。
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Oct;26(19-20):2845-2864. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13629. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
6
Guidelines on What Constitutes Plagiarism and Electronic Tools to Detect it.关于剽窃的构成及检测剽窃的电子工具的指南。
Clin Spine Surg. 2016 Apr;29(3):119-20. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000371.
7
Exploring the attitudes of medical faculty members and students in Pakistan towards plagiarism: a cross sectional survey.探究巴基斯坦医学教员和学生对抄袭的态度:一项横断面调查。
PeerJ. 2015 Jun 18;3:e1031. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1031. eCollection 2015.
8
How to conduct a workshop on medical writing: Tips, advice and experience sharing.如何举办医学写作工作坊:技巧、建议与经验分享。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2015 Jun;65(6):665-8.
9
Current status of information literacy instruction practices in medical libraries of Pakistan.巴基斯坦医学图书馆信息素养教学实践的现状。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2014 Oct;102(4):281-7. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.102.4.009.
10
Plagiarism in scientific research and publications and how to prevent it.科学研究与出版物中的剽窃行为以及如何预防它。
Mater Sociomed. 2014 Apr;26(2):141-6. doi: 10.5455/msm.2014.26.141-146. Epub 2014 Apr 11.