• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经危重症患者的应激性溃疡预防。

Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Neurocritical Care.

机构信息

Midwestern University, College of Pharmacy-Glendale, 19555 N 59th Avenue, Glendale, AZ, 85308, USA.

Honor Health- John C. Lincoln Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

出版信息

Neurocrit Care. 2018 Dec;29(3):344-357. doi: 10.1007/s12028-017-0447-y.

DOI:10.1007/s12028-017-0447-y
PMID:28929324
Abstract

Stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) with acid-suppressive drug therapy is widely utilized in critically ill patients following neurologic injury for the prevention of clinically important stress-related gastrointestinal bleeding (CIB). Data supporting SUP, however, largely originates from studies conducted during an era where practices were vastly different than what is considered routine by today's standard. This is particularly true in neurocritical care patients. In fact, the routine provision of SUP has been challenged due to an increasing prevalence of adverse drug events with acid-suppressive therapy and the perception that CIB rates are sparse. This narrative review will discuss current controversies with SUP as they apply to neurocritical care patients. Specifically, the pathophysiology, prevalence, and risk factors for CIB along with the comparative efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of acid-suppressive therapy will be described.

摘要

应激性溃疡预防(SUP)使用抑酸药物治疗在神经损伤后的重症患者中广泛应用,以预防临床上重要的应激相关胃肠道出血(CIB)。然而,支持 SUP 的数据主要来源于在与当今标准相差甚远的时代进行的研究。在神经重症患者中尤其如此。事实上,由于抑酸治疗的不良药物事件发生率增加以及 CIB 发生率稀少的认知,SUP 的常规应用已受到挑战。本综述将讨论 SUP 在神经重症患者中的当前争议。具体而言,将描述 CIB 的病理生理学、患病率和危险因素,以及抑酸治疗的比较疗效、安全性和成本效益。

相似文献

1
Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Neurocritical Care.神经危重症患者的应激性溃疡预防。
Neurocrit Care. 2018 Dec;29(3):344-357. doi: 10.1007/s12028-017-0447-y.
2
Acid Suppressive Therapy for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Noncritically Ill Patients.非危重症患者应激性溃疡预防的抑酸治疗
Ann Pharmacother. 2015 Sep;49(9):1004-8. doi: 10.1177/1060028015592014. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
3
Stress ulcer prophylaxis with proton pump inhibitors or histamine 2 receptor antagonists in critically ill adults - a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis.重症成人患者使用质子泵抑制剂或组胺 2 受体拮抗剂预防应激性溃疡 - 随机对照试验的荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2019 Nov 21;19(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-1105-y.
4
Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis.应激性溃疡预防
Crit Care Med. 2016 Jul;44(7):1395-405. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001872.
5
Use of proton pump inhibitors for the provision of stress ulcer prophylaxis: clinical and economic consequences.质子泵抑制剂在应激性溃疡预防中的应用:临床和经济后果。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Jan;32(1):5-13. doi: 10.1007/s40273-013-0119-5.
6
Re-evaluating the Utility of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in the Critically Ill Patient: A Clinical Scenario-Based Meta-Analysis.重新评估危重症患者应激性溃疡预防的作用:基于临床情景的荟萃分析。
Pharmacotherapy. 2019 Mar;39(3):408-420. doi: 10.1002/phar.2172. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
7
Are Proton Pump Inhibitors More Effective Than Histamine-2-Receptor Antagonists for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Critically Ill Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.质子泵抑制剂是否比组胺 2 受体拮抗剂更能有效预防危重症患者应激性溃疡?一项队列研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Pharmacother. 2022 Sep;56(9):988-997. doi: 10.1177/10600280211059040. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
8
Stress ulcer prophylaxis with a proton pump inhibitor versus placebo in critically ill patients (SUP-ICU trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.危重症患者使用质子泵抑制剂与安慰剂进行应激性溃疡预防(SUP-ICU试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Apr 19;17(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1331-3.
9
Stress ulcer prophylaxis versus placebo-a blinded randomized control trial to evaluate the safety of two strategies in critically ill infants with congenital heart disease (SUPPRESS-CHD).应激性溃疡预防与安慰剂对照的盲法随机对照试验,评估两种策略在患有先天性心脏病的危重症婴儿中的安全性(SUPPRESS-CHD)。
Trials. 2020 Jun 29;21(1):590. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04513-w.
10
Prophylaxis against Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Hospitalized Patients.住院患者上消化道出血的预防
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 28;378(26):2506-2516. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1605507.

引用本文的文献

1
Stressing over ulcer prophylaxis in the neurocritical trauma patient.神经重症创伤患者的溃疡预防问题令人担忧。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024 Mar 5;9(1):e001418. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001418. eCollection 2024.
2
A Nomogram for Individualized Prediction of Stress-Related Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Critically Ill Patients with Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage.用于个体化预测原发性脑出血重症患者应激相关胃肠道出血的列线图
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2022 Feb 9;18:221-229. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S342861. eCollection 2022.
3
Audit on Practices of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Intensive Care Unit Patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Withholding Pantoprazole for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Critically Ill Patients: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial and Meta-Analysis.在危重症患者中停用泮托拉唑进行应激性溃疡预防:一项初步随机临床试验和荟萃分析。
Crit Care Med. 2017 Jul;45(7):1121-1129. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002461.
2
Association of Gastric Acid Suppression With Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.胃酸抑制与艰难梭菌反复感染的关联:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jun 1;177(6):784-791. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0212.
3
Sucralfate versus histamine 2 receptor antagonists for stress ulcer prophylaxis in adult critically ill patients: A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized trials.
重症监护病房患者应激性溃疡预防措施的审计
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Mar;24(3):160-167. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23368.
硫糖铝与组胺2受体拮抗剂用于成人危重症患者应激性溃疡预防的比较:一项随机试验的荟萃分析和序贯分析
J Crit Care. 2017 Aug;40:21-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.03.005. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
4
Histamine H2-Blocker and Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and the Risk of Pneumonia in Acute Stroke: A Retrospective Analysis on Susceptible Patients.组胺H2受体阻滞剂和质子泵抑制剂的使用与急性卒中患者发生肺炎的风险:对易感患者的回顾性分析
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 13;12(1):e0169300. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169300. eCollection 2017.
5
Cost-Effectiveness of Histamine Receptor Antagonists Versus Proton Pump Inhibitors for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Critically Ill Patients.组胺受体拮抗剂与质子泵抑制剂用于危重症患者应激性溃疡预防的成本效益分析
Pharmacotherapy. 2017 Jan;37(1):43-53. doi: 10.1002/phar.1859. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
6
Assessing the Risk of Hospital-Acquired Clostridium Difficile Infection With Proton Pump Inhibitor Use: A Meta-Analysis.评估使用质子泵抑制剂导致医院获得性艰难梭菌感染的风险:一项荟萃分析。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Dec;37(12):1408-1417. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.194. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
7
Pantoprazole or Placebo for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis (POP-UP): Randomized Double-Blind Exploratory Study.泮托拉唑或安慰剂用于应激性溃疡预防(POP-UP):随机双盲探索性研究
Crit Care Med. 2016 Oct;44(10):1842-50. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001819.
8
Risk and Severity of Hospital-Acquired Clostridium difficile Infection in Patients Taking Proton Pump Inhibitors.服用质子泵抑制剂患者医院获得性艰难梭菌感染的风险与严重程度
Pharmacotherapy. 2016 Sep;36(9):986-93. doi: 10.1002/phar.1801. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
9
Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Population-Based Analysis of Hospitalizations in the United States.急性缺血性卒中患者的消化道出血:基于美国住院病例的人群分析
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016 Jul;25(7):1728-1735. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.03.044. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
10
Efficacy and safety of proton pump inhibitors for stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.质子泵抑制剂用于危重症患者应激性溃疡预防的疗效与安全性:一项随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Crit Care. 2016 May 4;20(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1305-6.