Arai Nobuhiko, Nakamizo Tomoki, Ihara Hikaru, Koide Takashi, Nakamura Akiyoshi, Tabuse Masanao, Miyazaki Hiromichi
Department of Neurological Surgery, Hiratsuka City Hospital, Hiratsuka City, Kanagawa, Japan.
Department of Neurology, Hiratsuka City Hospital, Hiratsuka City, Kanagawa, Japan.
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 13;12(1):e0169300. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169300. eCollection 2017.
Although histamine H2-blockers (H2B) and proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are used commonly to prevent gastrointestinal bleeding in acute stroke, they are implicated in the increased risk of pneumonia in other disease populations. In acute stroke, the presence of distinctive risk factors of pneumonia, including dysphagia and impaired consciousness, makes inclusive analysis vulnerable to confounding. Our aim was to assess whether acid-suppressive drugs increase pneumonia in acute stroke in a population controlled for confounding.
We analyzed acute stroke patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital. To minimize confounding, we only included subjects who could not feed orally during 14 days of hospitalization. Exposure was defined as H2B or PPI, given in days; the outcome was development of pneumonia within this period. The incidence was calculated from the total number of pneumonias divided by the sum of person-days at risk. We additionally performed multivariate Poisson regression and propensity score analyses, although the restriction largely eliminated the need for multivariate adjustment.
A total of 132 pneumonias occurred in 3582 person-days. The incidence was 3.69%/person-day (95% confidence interval (CI); 3.03-4.37%/day). All subjects had dysphagia. Stroke severity and consciousness disturbances were well-balanced between the groups exposed to H2B, PPI, or none. The relative risk (RR) compared with the unexposed was 1.22 in H2B (95%CI; 0.83-1.81) and 2.07 in PPI (95% CI; 1.13-3.62). The RR of PPI compared with H2B was 1.69 (95%CI; 0.95-2.89). In multivariate regression analysis, the RRs of H2B and PPI were 1.24 (95% CI; 0.85-1.81) and 2.00 (95% CI; 1.12-3.57), respectively; in propensity score analyses they were 1.17 (95% CI; 0.89-1.54) and 2.13 (95% CI; 1.60-2.84).
The results of this study suggested that prophylactic acid-suppressive therapy with PPI may have to be avoided in acute stroke patients susceptible to pneumonia.
尽管组胺H2受体阻滞剂(H2B)和质子泵抑制剂(PPI)常用于预防急性卒中患者的胃肠道出血,但在其他疾病人群中,它们与肺炎风险增加有关。在急性卒中患者中,存在包括吞咽困难和意识障碍在内的肺炎独特危险因素,使得全面分析容易受到混杂因素的影响。我们的目的是评估在控制了混杂因素的人群中,抑酸药物是否会增加急性卒中患者发生肺炎的风险。
我们分析了一家三级医院收治的急性卒中患者。为了尽量减少混杂因素的影响,我们仅纳入了住院14天内无法经口进食的患者。暴露因素定义为按天数给予的H2B或PPI;观察结局为在此期间是否发生肺炎。发病率通过肺炎总数除以风险人天数总和来计算。我们还进行了多变量泊松回归分析和倾向评分分析,尽管这种限制在很大程度上消除了多变量调整的必要性。
在3582人日中总共发生了132例肺炎。发病率为3.69%/人日(95%置信区间(CI);3.03 - 4.37%/日)。所有受试者均有吞咽困难。在接受H2B、PPI或未接受任何治疗的组之间,卒中严重程度和意识障碍情况均衡。与未暴露组相比,H2B组的相对风险(RR)为1.22(95%CI;0.83 - 1.81),PPI组为2.07(95%CI;1.13 - 3.62)。PPI组与H2B组相比的RR为1.69(95%CI;0.95 - 2.89)。在多变量回归分析中,H2B和PPI的RR分别为1.24(95%CI;0.85 - 1.81)和2.00(95%CI;1.12 - 3.57);在倾向评分分析中,它们分别为1.17(95%CI;0.89 - 1.54)和2.13(95%CI;1.60 - 2.84)。
本研究结果表明,对于易患肺炎的急性卒中患者,可能应避免使用PPI进行预防性抑酸治疗。