Division of Neurocritical Care and Division of Stroke, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Neuroscience Institute, Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Neurocrit Care. 2018 Apr;28(2):157-161. doi: 10.1007/s12028-017-0443-2.
External ventricular drains (EVD) are essential in the early management of hydrocephalus and elevated intracranial pressure after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Once in place, management of the EVD is thought to influence long-term patient outcomes, rates of ventriculitis, incidence of delayed cerebral ischemia, need for a ventriculoperitoneal shunt, and intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay. The available evidence supports adopting early clamp trials and intermittent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage. However, a recent survey demonstrated that most neurological ICUs employ the opposite approach of continuously open EVDs and gradual weaning. In this article, we review the literature and arguments for and against the different EVD approaches. We conclude that an early clamp trial and intermittent CSF drainage can be safe and result in fewer EVD complications and shorter length of stay. Given the discrepancy between the available evidence and current practice, more studies on the optimal management of EVDs are warranted with the greatest need for multicenter prospective studies.
脑室外引流(EVD)在蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)后脑积水和颅内压升高的早期治疗中至关重要。一旦放置妥当,EVD 的管理被认为会影响长期患者预后、脑室炎发生率、迟发性脑缺血发生率、需要脑室腹腔分流术以及重症监护病房(ICU)和住院时间。现有证据支持采用早期夹闭试验和间歇性脑脊液(CSF)引流。然而,最近的一项调查表明,大多数神经科 ICU 采用相反的方法,即持续开放 EVD 并逐渐减少。在本文中,我们回顾了文献以及不同 EVD 方法的优缺点。我们得出结论,早期夹闭试验和间歇性 CSF 引流是安全的,可以减少 EVD 并发症和缩短住院时间。鉴于现有证据与当前实践之间存在差异,需要更多关于 EVD 最佳管理的研究,最需要多中心前瞻性研究。