Edwards Todd C, Lavallee Danielle C, Clowes Alexander W, Devine Emily B, Flum David R, Meissner Mark H, Thomason Ellen T, Barbic Skye P, Beck Sara J, Patrick Donald L
1 University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
2 Providence Regional Medical Center, Everett, WA, USA.
Vasc Med. 2017 Dec;22(6):482-489. doi: 10.1177/1358863X17731623. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
This article describes the development of the Claudication Symptom Instrument (CSI) and its measurement properties for evaluating the symptom experience of patients diagnosed with intermittent claudication (IC). We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with IC patients for item development and cognitive interviews in which patient comprehension of items was tested. We evaluated measurement properties using data collected and analyzed in the context of an observational comparative effectiveness study of IC treatments. Items measuring five symptom important to patients were developed and cognitively tested: Pain, Numbness, Heaviness, Cramping, and Tingling. Item means (higher means worse) ranged from 1.1 (Tingling) to 2.3 (Pain) (range: 0 'none' to 4 'extreme'). Rasch analysis yielded support for an overall score (χ=26.5, df=20, p=0.15). The total CSI score differed by clinician-rated severity of mild versus moderate ( p<0.05), but not moderate versus severe. Re-administration of the CSI 5-10 days after baseline yielded an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.86. Changes in CSI total score and VASCUQOL total score between baseline and 6 months post-treatment were correlated at -0.52 ( p<0.05). The CSI preliminarily meets accepted measurement standards for content validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability, construct validity, and sensitivity for detecting change. Because of its high test-retest reliability, it may also be useful in clinical care with individual patients. It takes approximately 3 minutes to complete.
本文描述了间歇性跛行症状量表(CSI)的开发及其测量属性,用于评估被诊断为间歇性跛行(IC)患者的症状体验。我们对IC患者进行了半结构化定性访谈以进行条目开发,并进行了认知访谈以测试患者对条目的理解。我们使用在IC治疗的观察性比较有效性研究背景下收集和分析的数据来评估测量属性。开发并对测量患者认为重要的五种症状的条目进行了认知测试:疼痛、麻木、沉重感、痉挛和刺痛感。条目均值(均值越高症状越严重)范围从1.1(刺痛感)到2.3(疼痛)(范围:0代表“无”,4代表“极严重”)。拉施分析为总分提供了支持(χ=26.5,自由度=20,p=0.15)。CSI总分在临床医生评定的轻度与中度严重程度之间存在差异(p<0.05),但在中度与重度之间无差异。在基线后5 - 10天重新施测CSI,组内相关系数为0.86。基线与治疗后6个月之间CSI总分和VASCUQOL总分的变化相关性为 - 0.52(p<0.05)。CSI初步符合内容效度、内部一致性和重测信度、结构效度以及检测变化的敏感性等公认的测量标准。由于其高重测信度,它在个体患者的临床护理中可能也有用。完成该量表大约需要3分钟。