Stangeland Marcus, Engjom Trond, Mezl Martin, Jirik Radovan, Gilja Odd Helge, Dimcevski Georg, Nylund Kim
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Department of Medicine, Haukeland Universitetssjukehus, Bergen, Norway.
Ultrasound Int Open. 2017 Jun;3(3):E99-E106. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-110475. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) can be used for calculating organ perfusion. By combining bolus injection with burst replenishment, the actual mean transit time (MTT) can be estimated. Blood volume (BV) can be obtained by scaling the data to a vessel on the imaging plane. The study aim was to test interobserver agreement for repeated recordings using the same ultrasound scanner and agreement between results on two different scanner systems.
Ten patients under evaluation for exocrine pancreatic failure were included. Each patient was scanned two times on a GE Logiq E9 scanner, by two different observers, and once on a Philips IU22 scanner, after a bolus of 1.5 ml Sonovue. A 60-second recording of contrast enhancement was performed before the burst and the scan continued for another 30 s for reperfusion. We performed data analysis using MATLAB-based DCE-US software. An artery in the same depth as the region of interest (ROI) was used for scaling. The measurements were compared using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland Altman plots.
The interobserver agreement on the Logiq E9 for MTT (ICC=0.83, confidence interval (CI) 0.46-0.96) was excellent. There was poor agreement for MTT between the Logiq E9 and the IU22 (ICC=-0.084, CI -0.68-0.58). The interobserver agreement for blood volume measurements was excellent on the Logiq E9 (ICC=0.9286, CI 0.7250-0.98) and between scanners (ICC=0.86, CI=0.50-0.97).
Interobserver agreement was excellent using the same scanner for both parameters and between scanners for BV, but the comparison between two scanners did not yield acceptable agreement for MTT. This was probably due to incomplete bursting of bubbles in some of the recordings on the IU22.
动态对比增强超声(DCE-US)可用于计算器官灌注。通过将团注与突发补充相结合,可以估计实际平均通过时间(MTT)。通过将数据缩放到成像平面上的血管,可以获得血容量(BV)。本研究的目的是测试使用同一台超声扫描仪进行重复记录时观察者间的一致性,以及两种不同扫描仪系统结果之间的一致性。
纳入10例接受外分泌性胰腺功能不全评估的患者。在静脉注射1.5 ml声诺维后,由两名不同的观察者在GE Logiq E9扫描仪上对每位患者进行两次扫描,并在飞利浦IU22扫描仪上进行一次扫描。在突发前进行60秒的对比增强记录,并继续扫描30秒以进行再灌注。我们使用基于MATLAB的DCE-US软件进行数据分析。使用与感兴趣区域(ROI)相同深度的动脉进行缩放。使用组内相关系数(ICC)和布兰德-奥特曼图比较测量结果。
在Logiq E9上,观察者间关于MTT的一致性极佳(ICC = 0.83,置信区间(CI)0.46 - 0.96)。Logiq E9和IU22之间关于MTT的一致性较差(ICC = -0.084,CI -0.68 - 0.58)。在Logiq E9上以及两台扫描仪之间,观察者间关于血容量测量的一致性极佳(Logiq E9上ICC = 0.9286,CI 0.7250 - 0.98;两台扫描仪之间ICC = 0.86,CI = 0.50 - 0.97)。
对于这两个参数,使用同一台扫描仪时观察者间一致性极佳,对于BV,两台扫描仪之间的一致性也极佳,但两台扫描仪之间关于MTT的比较未产生可接受的一致性。这可能是由于IU22上的一些记录中气泡破裂不完全所致。