Suppr超能文献

动态对比增强超声胰腺灌注团注-脉冲法的观察者间差异

Interobserver Variation of the Bolus-and-Burst Method for Pancreatic Perfusion with Dynamic - Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.

作者信息

Stangeland Marcus, Engjom Trond, Mezl Martin, Jirik Radovan, Gilja Odd Helge, Dimcevski Georg, Nylund Kim

机构信息

Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Department of Medicine, Haukeland Universitetssjukehus, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Ultrasound Int Open. 2017 Jun;3(3):E99-E106. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-110475. Epub 2017 Sep 12.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) can be used for calculating organ perfusion. By combining bolus injection with burst replenishment, the actual mean transit time (MTT) can be estimated. Blood volume (BV) can be obtained by scaling the data to a vessel on the imaging plane. The study aim was to test interobserver agreement for repeated recordings using the same ultrasound scanner and agreement between results on two different scanner systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten patients under evaluation for exocrine pancreatic failure were included. Each patient was scanned two times on a GE Logiq E9 scanner, by two different observers, and once on a Philips IU22 scanner, after a bolus of 1.5 ml Sonovue. A 60-second recording of contrast enhancement was performed before the burst and the scan continued for another 30 s for reperfusion. We performed data analysis using MATLAB-based DCE-US software. An artery in the same depth as the region of interest (ROI) was used for scaling. The measurements were compared using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland Altman plots.

RESULTS

The interobserver agreement on the Logiq E9 for MTT (ICC=0.83, confidence interval (CI) 0.46-0.96) was excellent. There was poor agreement for MTT between the Logiq E9 and the IU22 (ICC=-0.084, CI -0.68-0.58). The interobserver agreement for blood volume measurements was excellent on the Logiq E9 (ICC=0.9286, CI 0.7250-0.98) and between scanners (ICC=0.86, CI=0.50-0.97).

CONCLUSION

Interobserver agreement was excellent using the same scanner for both parameters and between scanners for BV, but the comparison between two scanners did not yield acceptable agreement for MTT. This was probably due to incomplete bursting of bubbles in some of the recordings on the IU22.

摘要

目的

动态对比增强超声(DCE-US)可用于计算器官灌注。通过将团注与突发补充相结合,可以估计实际平均通过时间(MTT)。通过将数据缩放到成像平面上的血管,可以获得血容量(BV)。本研究的目的是测试使用同一台超声扫描仪进行重复记录时观察者间的一致性,以及两种不同扫描仪系统结果之间的一致性。

材料与方法

纳入10例接受外分泌性胰腺功能不全评估的患者。在静脉注射1.5 ml声诺维后,由两名不同的观察者在GE Logiq E9扫描仪上对每位患者进行两次扫描,并在飞利浦IU22扫描仪上进行一次扫描。在突发前进行60秒的对比增强记录,并继续扫描30秒以进行再灌注。我们使用基于MATLAB的DCE-US软件进行数据分析。使用与感兴趣区域(ROI)相同深度的动脉进行缩放。使用组内相关系数(ICC)和布兰德-奥特曼图比较测量结果。

结果

在Logiq E9上,观察者间关于MTT的一致性极佳(ICC = 0.83,置信区间(CI)0.46 - 0.96)。Logiq E9和IU22之间关于MTT的一致性较差(ICC = -0.084,CI -0.68 - 0.58)。在Logiq E9上以及两台扫描仪之间,观察者间关于血容量测量的一致性极佳(Logiq E9上ICC = 0.9286,CI 0.7250 - 0.98;两台扫描仪之间ICC = 0.86,CI = 0.50 - 0.97)。

结论

对于这两个参数,使用同一台扫描仪时观察者间一致性极佳,对于BV,两台扫描仪之间的一致性也极佳,但两台扫描仪之间关于MTT的比较未产生可接受的一致性。这可能是由于IU22上的一些记录中气泡破裂不完全所致。

相似文献

1
Interobserver Variation of the Bolus-and-Burst Method for Pancreatic Perfusion with Dynamic - Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.
Ultrasound Int Open. 2017 Jun;3(3):E99-E106. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-110475. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
4
Intra- and interobserver agreement for fetal cerebral measurements in 3D-ultrasonography.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Aug;39(8):3277-3284. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24076. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
5
Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of pancreatic perfusion by computed tomography.
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 15;9(1):6043. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42519-w.
6
In vitro evaluation of the impact of ultrasound scanner settings and contrast bolus volume on time-intensity curves.
Ultrasonics. 2012 Jan;52(1):12-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2011.06.003. Epub 2011 Jun 13.
7
Variability, Validity and Operator Reliability of Three Ultrasound Systems for Measuring Tissue Stiffness: A Phantom Study.
Cureus. 2022 Nov 21;14(11):e31731. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31731. eCollection 2022 Nov.
9
Reproducibility of VPCT parameters in the normal pancreas: comparison of two different kinetic calculation models.
Acad Radiol. 2015 Sep;22(9):1099-105. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 Jun 23.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Dynamic contrast enhanced ultrasound for therapy monitoring.
Eur J Radiol. 2015 Sep;84(9):1650-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.05.013. Epub 2015 Jun 28.
4
Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound for quantification of tissue perfusion.
J Ultrasound Med. 2015 Feb;34(2):179-96. doi: 10.7863/ultra.34.2.179.
5
Blind deconvolution in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and ultrasound.
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:4276-9. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944569.
6
Semi-automatic motion compensation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound images from abdominal organs for perfusion analysis.
Comput Biol Med. 2015 Aug;63:229-37. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.09.014. Epub 2014 Oct 17.
8
Quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound comparison between inflammatory and fibrotic lesions in patients with Crohn's disease.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013 Jul;39(7):1197-206. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.01.020. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
9
Ultrasound perfusion analysis combining bolus-tracking and burst-replenishment.
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2013 Feb;60(2):310-9. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2013.2567.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验