Division of Woman and Baby, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Aug;39(8):3277-3284. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24076. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
The aim of this study is to evaluate intra- and interobserver agreement for measurement of intracranial, cerebellar, and thalamic volume with the Virtual Organ Computer-aided AnaLysis (VOCAL) technique in three-dimensional ultrasound images, in comparison to two-dimensional measurements of these brain structures. Three-dimensional ultrasound images of the brains of 80 fetuses at 20-24 weeks' gestational age were obtained from YOUth, a Dutch prospective cohort study. Two observers performed offline measurement of the occipitofrontal diameter, intracranial volume, transcerebellar diameter, cerebellar volume, and thalamic width, area, and volume, independently. VOCAL was used for calculation of the volumes. The two-way random, single measures intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for analysis of agreement and Bland-Altman plots were configured. Intra- and interobserver agreement was almost perfect for occipitofrontal diameter (intra ICC 0.88, 95% CI 0.82-0.92; inter ICC 0.91, 95% CI 0.85-0.94), intracranial volume (intra ICC 0.96, 95% CI 0.91-0.98; inter ICC 0.97, 95% CI 0.96-0.98) and transcerebellar diameter (intra ICC 0.91, 95% CI 0.86-0.94; inter ICC 0.86, 95% CI 0.78-0.910). For cerebellar volume, the intraobserver agreement was almost perfect (0.85, 95% CI 0.76-0.90), whereas the interobserver agreement was substantial (0.75, 95% CI 0.44-0.88). Agreement was only moderate for thalamic measurements. Bland-Altman plots for the volume measurements are normally distributed with acceptable mean differences and 95% limits of agreement. The intra- and interobserver agreement of the measurement of intracranial and cerebellar volume with VOCAL was almost perfect. These measurements are therefore reliable, and can be used to investigate fetal brain development. Thalamic measurements are not reliable enough.
本研究旨在评估在三维超声图像中使用虚拟器官计算机辅助分析(VOCAL)技术测量颅内、小脑和丘脑体积的观察者内和观察者间一致性,并与这些脑结构的二维测量进行比较。从荷兰前瞻性队列研究 YOUth 中获得了 80 名 20-24 孕周胎儿的三维超声图像。两名观察者离线独立测量了枕额径、颅内体积、小脑横径、小脑体积以及丘脑的宽度、面积和体积。使用 VOCAL 计算体积。采用双向随机、单测量组内相关系数(ICC)分析一致性,并绘制 Bland-Altman 图。枕额径的观察者内和观察者间一致性几乎为完美(内 ICC 0.88,95%CI 0.82-0.92;间 ICC 0.91,95%CI 0.85-0.94)、颅内体积(内 ICC 0.96,95%CI 0.91-0.98;间 ICC 0.97,95%CI 0.96-0.98)和小脑横径(内 ICC 0.91,95%CI 0.86-0.94;间 ICC 0.86,95%CI 0.78-0.91)。小脑体积的观察者内一致性几乎为完美(0.85,95%CI 0.76-0.90),而观察者间一致性为中等(0.75,95%CI 0.44-0.88)。丘脑测量的一致性仅为中度。体积测量的 Bland-Altman 图呈正态分布,具有可接受的平均差异和 95%的一致性界限。使用 VOCAL 测量颅内和小脑体积的观察者内和观察者间一致性几乎为完美。因此,这些测量是可靠的,可以用于研究胎儿大脑发育。丘脑测量的可靠性不够。