• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单中心腹疝修补术联合猪真皮胶原植入物。

Single-center ventral hernia repair with porcine dermis collagen implant.

机构信息

Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, A100, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.

Fundació Clínic per la Recerca Biomèdica, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1820-1827. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5866-5. Epub 2017 Sep 20.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-017-5866-5
PMID:28932941
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to evaluate the outcomes and utilization of porcine acellular dermal collagen implant (PADCI) during VHR at a large tertiary referral center.

METHODS

Records of 5485 patients who underwent VIHR from June 1995 to August 2014 were retrospectively reviewed to identify patients >18 years of age who had VIHR with PADCI reinforcement. Use of multiple mesh reinforcement products, inguinal hernias, and hiatal hernias were exclusion criteria. The primary outcome was hernia recurrence, and secondary outcomes were early complications and surgical site occurrences (SSOs). Uni- and multivariate analyses assessed risk factors for recurrence after PADCI reinforced VIHR.

RESULTS

There were 361 patients identified (54.5% female, mean age of 56.7 ± 12.5 years, and mean body mass index (BMI) of 33.0 ± 9.9 kg/m). Hypertension (49.5%), diabetes (24.3%), and coronary artery disease (14.4%) were the most common comorbidities, as was active smoking (20.7%). Most were classified as American Association of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class 3 (61.7%). Hernias were distributed across all grades of the ventral hernia working group (VHWG) grading system: grade I 93 (25.7%), grade II 51 (14.1%), grade III 113 (31.3%), and grade IV 6 (1.6%). Most VIHR were performed from an open approach (96.1%), and were frequently combined with concomitant surgical procedures (47.9%). Early postoperative complications (first 30 days) were reported in 39.0%, with 71 being SSO. Of the 19.7% of patients with SSO, there were 31 who required procedural intervention. After a mean follow-up of 71.5 ± 20.5 months, hernia recurrence was documented in 34.9% of patients. Age and male gender were predictors of recurrence on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest retrospective single institutional study evaluating PADCI to date. Hernias repaired with PADCI were frequently in patients undergoing concomitant operations. Reinforcement with PADCI may be considered a temporary closure, with a relatively high recurrence rate, especially among patients who are older, male, and undergo multiple explorations in a short perioperative period.

摘要

介绍

本研究旨在评估在大型三级转诊中心进行 VHR 时使用猪脱细胞真皮胶原植入物(PADCI)的结果和利用情况。

方法

回顾性分析 1995 年 6 月至 2014 年 8 月期间 5485 例接受 VIHR 的患者记录,以确定年龄>18 岁且接受 VIHR 并使用 PADCI 增强的患者。排除使用多种网片增强产品、腹股沟疝和食管裂孔疝的患者。主要结局是疝复发,次要结局是早期并发症和手术部位事件(SSO)。单因素和多因素分析评估了 PADCI 增强 VIHR 后复发的危险因素。

结果

共确定了 361 例患者(54.5%为女性,平均年龄 56.7±12.5 岁,平均体重指数(BMI)为 33.0±9.9kg/m²)。最常见的合并症是高血压(49.5%)、糖尿病(24.3%)和冠状动脉疾病(14.4%),以及吸烟(20.7%)。大多数患者被归类为美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级 3(61.7%)。疝分布在腹疝工作组(VHWG)分级系统的所有等级:I 级 93 例(25.7%),II 级 51 例(14.1%),III 级 113 例(31.3%),IV 级 6 例(1.6%)。大多数 VIHR 是通过开放入路进行的(96.1%),并且经常与同时进行的手术相结合(47.9%)。报告了 39.0%的早期术后并发症(前 30 天),71 例为 SSO。在 19.7%的 SSO 患者中,有 31 例需要进行程序性干预。在平均随访 71.5±20.5 个月后,有 34.9%的患者记录到疝复发。年龄和男性是多因素分析中复发的预测因素。

结论

据我们所知,这是迄今为止最大的回顾性单机构研究,评估了 PADCI 的使用情况。使用 PADCI 修复的疝经常发生在同时进行手术的患者中。用 PADCI 增强可能被认为是一种暂时的关闭,其复发率相对较高,尤其是在年龄较大、男性和在围手术期内进行多次探查的患者中。

相似文献

1
Single-center ventral hernia repair with porcine dermis collagen implant.单中心腹疝修补术联合猪真皮胶原植入物。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1820-1827. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5866-5. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
2
Outcomes with porcine acellular dermal matrix versus synthetic mesh and suture in complicated open ventral hernia repair.猪脱细胞真皮基质与合成补片及缝线用于复杂开放性腹疝修补术的疗效比较
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014 Oct;15(5):506-12. doi: 10.1089/sur.2013.090. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
3
A comparison of outcomes and cost in VHWG grade II hernias between Rives-Stoppa synthetic mesh hernia repair versus underlay biologic mesh repair.Rives-Stoppa合成网片疝修补术与底层生物网片修补术治疗VHWG II级疝的疗效及成本比较。
Hernia. 2014;18(6):781-9. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1309-6. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
4
Outcomes Analysis of Biologic Mesh Use for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction in Clean-Contaminated and Contaminated Ventral Hernia Repair.生物补片用于清洁-污染和污染性腹疝修补术中腹壁重建的疗效分析
Ann Plast Surg. 2015 Aug;75(2):201-4. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000030.
5
A retrospective study evaluating the use of Permacol™ surgical implant in incisional and ventral hernia repair.一项回顾性研究评估 Permacol™ 外科植入物在切口疝和腹疝修复中的应用。
Int J Surg. 2014;12(4):296-303. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.01.025. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
6
Evaluation of high-risk, comorbid patients undergoing open ventral hernia repair with synthetic mesh.评估使用合成网片行开放型腹侧疝修补术的高危、合并症患者。
Surgery. 2013 Jan;153(1):120-5. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.06.003. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
7
Component separation with porcine acellular dermal reinforcement is superior to traditional bridged mesh repairs in the open repair of significant midline ventral hernia defects.在开放性修复巨大中线腹疝缺损时,采用猪脱细胞真皮加强的成分分离术优于传统的桥接补片修补术。
Am Surg. 2014 Aug;80(8):725-31.
8
Indications and outcomes following complex abdominal reconstruction with component separation combined with porcine acellular dermal matrix reinforcement.复杂腹壁重建联合成分离术及猪脱细胞真皮基质强化后的适应证及治疗结果
Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Oct;69(4):394-8. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31822f997b.
9
A Comparison of Component Separation With Porcine Acellular Dermal Reinforcement to Bovine Acellular Dermal Matrix in the Repair of Significant Midline Ventral Hernia Defects.补片分隔技术与猪脱细胞真皮基质和牛脱细胞真皮基质在修复巨大中线腹壁疝缺损中的比较。
Am Surg. 2023 Apr;89(4):1003-1008. doi: 10.1177/00031348211050844. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
10
Onlay parastomal hernia repair with cross-linked porcine dermal collagen biologic mesh: long-term results.使用交联猪真皮胶原蛋白生物补片行造口旁疝修补术:长期结果
Hernia. 2016 Apr;20(2):321-5. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1452-8. Epub 2015 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Abdominal wall hernia repair: from prosthetic meshes to smart materials.腹壁疝修补术:从人工合成补片到智能材料
Mater Today Bio. 2023 Jun 29;21:100691. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100691. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Biologic Mesh in Surgery: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis of Selected Outcomes in 51 Studies and 6079 Patients.外科手术中的生物补片:对51项研究和6079例患者的选定结局进行的综合综述与荟萃分析
World J Surg. 2021 Dec;45(12):3524-3540. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05887-3. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
3
Stomal stenosis during gradual closure of a traumatic abdominal wall hernia.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative analysis of biologic versus synthetic mesh outcomes in contaminated hernia repairs.污染性疝修补术中生物补片与合成补片效果的对比分析。
Surgery. 2016 Oct;160(4):828-838. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.04.041. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
2
Which mesh or graft? Prosthetic devices for abdominal wall reconstruction.选择哪种补片或移植物?用于腹壁重建的假体装置。
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2016 Mar;77(3):157-8, 159-61. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2016.77.3.157.
3
The use of an acellular porcine dermal collagen implant in the repair of complex abdominal wall defects: a European multicentre retrospective study.
外伤性腹壁疝逐渐闭合过程中的造口狭窄
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2019;60:284-286. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2019.06.020. Epub 2019 Jun 16.
4
Systematic review of the stage of innovation of biological mesh for complex or contaminated abdominal wall closure.生物补片用于复杂或污染腹壁闭合创新阶段的系统评价
BJS Open. 2018 Jun 14;2(6):371-380. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.78. eCollection 2018 Dec.
5
Indications and Outcomes of a Cross-Linked Porcine Dermal Collagen Mesh (Permacol) for Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A Multicenter Audit.交联猪真皮胶原网片(Permacol)用于复杂腹壁重建的适应证及疗效:一项多中心审计
World J Surg. 2019 Mar;43(3):791-797. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4853-x.
脱细胞猪真皮胶原蛋白植入物在复杂腹壁缺损修复中的应用:一项欧洲多中心回顾性研究。
Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Jul;19(7):411-7. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1307-4. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
4
Outcome of abdominal wall hernia repair with biologic mesh: Permacol™ versus Strattice™.生物补片用于腹壁疝修补的效果:Permacol™与Strattice™对比
Am Surg. 2014 Oct;80(10):999-1002.
5
A retrospective study evaluating the use of Permacol™ surgical implant in incisional and ventral hernia repair.一项回顾性研究评估 Permacol™ 外科植入物在切口疝和腹疝修复中的应用。
Int J Surg. 2014;12(4):296-303. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.01.025. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
6
Single institutional experience using biological mesh for abdominal wall reconstruction.单机构使用生物补片进行腹壁重建的经验。
Am J Surg. 2014 Sep;208(3):480-4; discussion 483-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.09.020. Epub 2013 Dec 25.
7
Outcome of abdominal wall hernia repair with Permacol™ biologic mesh.使用Permacol™生物补片进行腹壁疝修补的结果
Am Surg. 2013 Oct;79(10):992-6.
8
Long-term outcomes (>5-year follow-up) with porcine acellular dermal matrix (Permacol) in incisional hernias at risk for infection.在有感染风险的切口疝中使用猪去细胞真皮基质(Permacol)的长期结果(>5 年随访)。
Hernia. 2015 Feb;19(1):135-40. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1165-9. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
9
Biologic mesh use practice patterns in abdominal wall reconstruction: a lack of consensus among surgeons.生物补片在腹壁重建中的应用实践模式:外科医生之间缺乏共识。
Hernia. 2013 Feb;17(1):13-20. doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-1029-8. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
10
Italian Biological Prosthesis Work-Group (IBPWG): proposal for a decisional model in using biological prosthesis.意大利生物假体工作组(IBPWG):使用生物假体的决策模型提案。
World J Emerg Surg. 2012 Nov 2;7(1):34. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-7-34.