1 Queensland Cerebral Palsy and Rehabilitation Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Centre for Children's Health Research, South Brisbane, Australia.
2 Faculty of Psychology & Counselling, University Southern Queensland, Ipswich, Australia.
Clin Rehabil. 2017 Oct;31(10):1351-1363. doi: 10.1177/0269215517695373. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
To examine the efficacy of a multi-modal web-based therapy program, Move it to improve it (Mitii™) delivered at home to improve Executive Functioning (EF) in children with an acquired brain injury (ABI).
Randomised Waitlist controlled trial.
Home environment.
Sixty children with an ABI were matched in pairs by age and intelligence quotient then randomised to either 20-weeks of Mitii™ training or 20 weeks of Care As Usual (waitlist control; n=30; 17 males; mean age=11y, 11m (±2y, 6m); Full Scale IQ=76.24±17.84). Fifty-eight children completed baseline assessments (32 males; mean age=11.87±2.47; Full Scale IQ=75.21±16.76).
Executive functioning was assessed on four domains: attentional control, cognitive flexibility, goal setting, and information processing using subtests from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-IV), Delis-Kaplan Executive Functioning System (D-KEFS), Comprehensive Trail Making Test (CTMT), Tower of London (TOL), and Test of Everyday Attention for Children (Tea-Ch). Executive functioning performance in everyday life was assessed via parent questionnaire (Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning; BRIEF).
No differences were observed at baseline measures. Groups were compared at 20-weeks using linear regression with no significant differences found between groups on all measures of EF. Out of a potential total dose of 60 hours, children in the Mitii™ group completed a mean of 17 hours of Mitii™ intervention.
Results indicate no additional benefit to receiving Mitii™ compared to standard care. Mitii™, in its current form, was not shown to improve EF in children with ABI.
研究一种多模式基于网络的家庭治疗方案——移动以改善它(Mitii)对改善获得性脑损伤(ABI)儿童执行功能的疗效。
随机候补对照试验。
家庭环境。
通过年龄和智商进行配对后,将 60 名 ABI 儿童分为两组,然后随机分配到 20 周的 Mitii 训练或 20 周的常规护理(候补对照;n=30;17 名男性;平均年龄=11 岁,11 个月(±2 岁,6 个月);全量表智商=76.24±17.84)。58 名儿童完成了基线评估(32 名男性;平均年龄=11.87±2.47;全量表智商=75.21±16.76)。
使用韦氏儿童智力量表(WISC-IV)、德里-卡普兰执行功能系统(D-KEFS)、综合连线测试(CTMT)、伦敦塔(TOL)和儿童日常注意测试(Tea-Ch)的子测试,从注意力控制、认知灵活性、目标设定和信息处理四个领域评估执行功能。通过家长问卷(行为评定量表的执行功能;BRIEF)评估日常生活中的执行功能表现。
基线测量时未观察到差异。在 20 周时使用线性回归进行组间比较,两组在所有执行功能测量上均无显著差异。在 60 小时的潜在总剂量中,Mitii 组的儿童完成了平均 17 小时的 Mitii 干预。
结果表明,与标准护理相比,接受 Mitii 治疗没有额外的益处。Mitii 以其目前的形式,并没有显示出对 ABI 儿童执行功能的改善。