Starns Jeffrey J, Ma Qiuli
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Apr;44(4):527-539. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000461. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
The two-high-threshold (2HT) model of recognition memory assumes that people make memory errors because they fail to retrieve information from memory and make a guess, whereas the continuous unequal-variance (UV) model and the low-threshold (LT) model assume that people make memory errors because they retrieve misleading information from memory. We explored the nature of memory errors by comparing guessing and memory performance. In 2 experiments, participants studied lists of words followed by a test in which each trial was preceded by a cue indicating the probability that the trial would have a studied word. Participants first guessed whether or not the word would be studied, and then they saw the word and responded again. When the response that was more likely according to the cue was the correct response, participants made more errors after attempting to remember the word than in their initial guesses. This suggests that participants made errors because they retrieved misleading information even when they could guess the correct response on the basis of the probability cue. We also compared the models in terms of their ability to fit ROC functions using parametric bootstrap procedures to correct for model mimicry. These analyses supported both the UV and LT models over the 2HT model. (PsycINFO Database Record
识别记忆的双高阈值(2HT)模型假定,人们出现记忆错误是因为他们无法从记忆中检索信息并进行猜测,而连续异方差(UV)模型和低阈值(LT)模型则假定,人们出现记忆错误是因为他们从记忆中检索到了误导性信息。我们通过比较猜测和记忆表现来探究记忆错误的本质。在两项实验中,参与者学习单词列表,随后进行测试,每次测试前都会有一个提示,表明该次测试出现学过单词的概率。参与者首先猜测该单词是否被学过,然后他们会看到这个单词并再次做出反应。当根据提示更有可能出现的反应是正确反应时,参与者在试图记住单词后比在最初猜测时犯的错误更多。这表明,即使参与者能够根据概率提示猜出正确反应,他们仍然会出错,原因是他们检索到了误导性信息。我们还使用参数自举程序比较了这些模型拟合ROC函数的能力,以校正模型模仿问题。这些分析支持UV模型和LT模型,而不支持2HT模型。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》 )