Jamieson Randall K, Mewhort D J K, Hockley William E
Department of Psychology.
Department of Psychology, Queen's University.
Can J Exp Psychol. 2016 Jun;70(2):154-64. doi: 10.1037/cep0000081.
People remember words that they read aloud better than words that they read silently, a result known as the production effect. The standing explanation for the production effect is that producing a word renders it distinctive in memory and, thus, memorable at test. By 1 key account, distinctiveness is defined in terms of sensory feedback. We formalize the sensory-feedback account using MINERVA 2, a standard model of memory. The model accommodates the basic result in recognition as well as the fact that the mixed-list production effect is larger than its pure-list counterpart, that the production effect is robust to forgetting, and that the production and generation effects have additive influences on performance. A final simulation addresses the strength-based account and suggests that it will be more difficult to distinguish a strength-based versus distinctiveness-based explanation than is typically thought. We conclude that the production effect is consistent with existing theory and discuss our analysis in relation to Alan Newell's (1973) classic criticism of psychology and call for an analysis of psychological principles instead of laboratory phenomena. (PsycINFO Database Record
人们对大声朗读的单词的记忆要比对默读单词的记忆更好,这一结果被称为生成效应。对生成效应的传统解释是,生成一个单词会使其在记忆中变得独特,因此在测试时更容易被记住。根据一个关键解释,独特性是根据感官反馈来定义的。我们使用记忆的标准模型MINERVA 2将感官反馈解释形式化。该模型既符合识别中的基本结果,也符合以下事实:混合列表生成效应大于纯列表生成效应,生成效应在遗忘情况下依然稳健,并且生成效应和产生效应对表现有累加影响。最后一个模拟涉及基于强度的解释,并表明区分基于强度的解释和基于独特性的解释比通常认为的要困难。我们得出结论,生成效应与现有理论一致,并结合艾伦·纽厄尔(1973)对心理学的经典批评来讨论我们的分析,并呼吁对心理学原理而非实验室现象进行分析。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》 )