• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨层次调查非正式现场学习和绩效提升。

A cross-level investigation of informal field-based learning and performance improvements.

机构信息

Management Department, University of Connecticut.

The Group for Organizational Effectiveness (gOE.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2018 Jan;103(1):14-36. doi: 10.1037/apl0000267. Epub 2017 Sep 21.

DOI:10.1037/apl0000267
PMID:28933909
Abstract

Organizations often operate in complex and dynamic environments which place a premium on employees' ongoing learning and acquisition of new competencies. Additionally, the majority of learning in organizations does not take place in formal training settings, but we know relatively little about how informal field-based learning (IFBL) behaviors relate to changes in job performance. In this study, we first clarified the construct of IFBL as a subset of informal learning. Second, on the basis of this clarified construct definition, we developed a measure of IFBL behaviors and demonstrated its psychometric properties using (a) a sample of subject matter experts who made item content validity judgments and (b) both an Amazon Mechanical Turk sample (N = 400) and a sample of 1,707 healthcare employees. Third, we advanced a grounded theory of IFBL in healthcare, and related it to individuals' regulatory foci and contextual moderators of IFBL behaviors-job performance relationships using a cross-level design and lagged nonmethod bound measures. Specifically, using a sample of 407 healthcare workers from 49 hospital units, our results suggested that promotion-focused individuals, especially in well-staffed units, readily engage in IFBL behaviors. Additionally, we found that the IFBL-changes in job performance relationship was strengthened to the extent that individuals worked in units with relatively nonpunitive climates. Interestingly, staffing levels had a weakening moderating effect on the positive IFBL-performance improvements relationship. Detailed follow-up analyses revealed that the peculiar effect was attributable to differential relationships from IFBL subdimensions. Implications for future theory building, research, and practice are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

组织通常在复杂和动态的环境中运作,这对员工的持续学习和新能力的获得提出了很高的要求。此外,组织中的大多数学习都不是在正式的培训环境中进行的,但我们对非正规实地学习(IFBL)行为与工作绩效变化之间的关系了解甚少。在这项研究中,我们首先澄清了 IFBL 作为非正式学习的一个子集的结构。其次,基于这个澄清的结构定义,我们开发了一个 IFBL 行为的衡量标准,并使用(a)一组进行项目内容有效性判断的主题专家样本,以及(b)一个亚马逊土耳其机器人样本(N=400)和一个由 1707 名医疗保健员工组成的样本,证明了其心理测量学特性。第三,我们在医疗保健领域提出了一个关于 IFBL 的扎根理论,并使用跨层次设计和滞后非方法绑定措施,将其与个人的监管焦点和 IFBL 行为与工作绩效关系的背景调节因素联系起来。具体来说,使用来自 49 个医院单位的 407 名医疗保健工作者的样本,我们的结果表明,以晋升为导向的个体,尤其是在人员配备充足的单位,更容易参与 IFBL 行为。此外,我们发现,IFBL-工作绩效变化的关系在个人在相对非惩罚性氛围的单位工作时得到了加强。有趣的是,人员配备水平对 IFBL-绩效提升关系的积极影响具有削弱作用。详细的后续分析表明,这种特殊的影响归因于 IFBL 子维度的不同关系。讨论了对未来理论构建、研究和实践的影响。

相似文献

1
A cross-level investigation of informal field-based learning and performance improvements.跨层次调查非正式现场学习和绩效提升。
J Appl Psychol. 2018 Jan;103(1):14-36. doi: 10.1037/apl0000267. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
2
Informal field-based learning and work design.非正式现场学习和工作设计。
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Oct;104(10):1283-1295. doi: 10.1037/apl0000408. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
3
Job insecurity and job performance: The moderating role of organizational justice and the mediating role of work engagement.工作不安全感和工作绩效:组织公平的调节作用和工作投入的中介作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Jul;100(4):1249-58. doi: 10.1037/a0038330. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
4
Job crafting revisited: Implications of an extended framework for active changes at work.重新审视工作重塑:扩展框架对工作中积极变化的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2019 May;104(5):605-628. doi: 10.1037/apl0000362. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
5
The role of job security in understanding the relationship between employees' perceptions of temporary workers and employees' performance.工作保障在理解员工对临时工的认知与员工绩效之间关系中的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Mar;90(2):389-98. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.389.
6
The influence of family-supportive supervisor training on employee job performance and attitudes: An organizational work-family intervention.家庭支持型主管培训对员工工作绩效和态度的影响:组织工作-家庭干预。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2016 Jul;21(3):296-308. doi: 10.1037/a0039961. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
7
Human resource management and unit performance in knowledge-intensive work.知识密集型工作中的人力资源管理与单位绩效。
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Aug;102(8):1222-1236. doi: 10.1037/apl0000216. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
8
Job insecurity and discretionary behaviors: Social exchange perspective versus group value model.工作不安全感与自主行为:社会交换视角与群体价值模型
Scand J Psychol. 2017 Feb;58(1):69-79. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12340. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
9
Are proactive personalities always beneficial? Political skill as a moderator.积极主动的性格总是有益的吗?政治技巧作为调节因素。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 May;100(3):966-75. doi: 10.1037/a0037833. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
10
Employees on the rebound: Extending the careers literature to include boomerang employment.重返职场的员工:将职业发展文献扩展到包括“回巢”就业。
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Jun;102(6):890-909. doi: 10.1037/apl0000200. Epub 2017 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
How does rapport impact knowledge transfer from older to younger employees? The moderating role of supportive climate.融洽关系如何影响知识从年长员工向年轻员工的传递?支持性氛围的调节作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 7;13:1032143. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1032143. eCollection 2022.
2
Balancing Work Life: Job Crafting, Work Engagement, and Workaholism in the Finnish Public Sector.平衡工作与生活:芬兰公共部门中的工作重塑、工作投入与工作狂倾向
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 31;13:817008. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.817008. eCollection 2022.
3
Teacher Online Informal Learning as a Means to Innovative Teaching During Home Quarantine in the COVID-19 Pandemic.
在新冠疫情居家隔离期间,教师在线非正式学习作为创新教学的一种方式
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 24;12:596582. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.596582. eCollection 2021.
4
A Motivational Mechanism Framework for Teachers' Online Informal Learning and Innovation During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间教师在线非正式学习与创新的动机机制框架
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 31;12:601200. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.601200. eCollection 2021.