Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gachon University, Gil Medical Center, Incheon, South Korea.
Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Ilsan, South Korea.
Pain Physician. 2017 Sep;20(6):529-535.
The cluster approach for supraclavicular brachial plexus block (SC-BPB) can be easily performed but may result in asymmetric local anesthetic (LA) spread. The authors hypothesized that the use of a cluster approach in each of the 2 planes would achieve better 3-dimensional LA distribution than the traditional single cluster approach.
The purpose of the present study was to compare a double injection (DI) in 2 planes (one injection in each plane) with the traditional single injection (SI) cluster approach for ultrasound-guided SC-BPB.
A randomized, controlled trial.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center.
In the SI group (n = 18), 30 mL of LA was injected into the main neural cluster after penetrating the brachial plexus sheath laterally. In the DI group (n = 18), the needle penetrated the sheath in a downward direction at the first skin puncture, and 15 mL of LA was injected, and at the second skin puncture (behind the initial puncture site), the needle penetrated the sheath in an upward direction, and 15 mL was again injected. Ultrasound-guided SC-BPB was evaluated from immediately after the block every 5 minutes to 30 minutes by sensory and motor testing. The main outcome variables were procedural time; onset time (time for complete sensory and motor block of the median, radial, ulnar, and musculocutaneous nerves); and rate of blockage of all 4 nerves.
Procedure times (medians [interquartile range]) were similar in the DI and SI groups (5.5 [4.75 - 8] vs. 5 [4 - 7] minutes, respectively; P = 0.137). Block onset time in the DI group was not significantly different from that in the SI group (10 [5 - 17.5] vs. 20 [6.25 - 30] minutes, P = 0.142). However, the rate of blockage of all 4 nerves was significantly higher in the DI group (94% vs. 67%, P = 0.035).
Although the results of this study indicate LA distribution in the DI group was more evenly spread within brachial plexus sheaths than in the SI group, this was not confirmed by ultrasonography or contrast radiography.
The DI approach can be performed easily as single cluster approach and increases the consistency of ultrasound-guided SC-BPB over the SI approach in terms of the rate of blocking of all 4 nerves. Key words: Brachial plexus block, corner pocket approach, cluster approach, multiple injection, supraclavicular block, ultrasound.
锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞(SC-BPB)的丛集方法易于实施,但可能导致局部麻醉药(LA)分布不对称。作者假设在两个平面中使用丛集方法可以比传统的单个丛集方法实现更好的三维 LA 分布。
本研究旨在比较超声引导下 SC-BPB 的双注射(DI)在两个平面(每个平面各注射一次)与传统的单注射(SI)丛集方法。
随机对照试验。
加图立大学仁川圣母医院麻醉与疼痛医学系。
在 SI 组(n = 18)中,在横向穿透臂丛神经鞘后,将 30 mL 的 LA 注入主要神经丛集。在 DI 组(n = 18)中,针在第一次皮肤穿刺时向下穿透鞘,注入 15 mL 的 LA,在第二次皮肤穿刺(在初始穿刺部位后面)时,针向上穿透鞘,再次注入 15 mL。通过感觉和运动测试,在阻滞后立即每隔 5 分钟至 30 分钟评估超声引导下的 SC-BPB。主要观察变量是操作时间;阻滞开始时间(正中、桡、尺和肌皮神经完全感觉和运动阻滞的时间);以及所有 4 根神经阻滞的速度。
DI 组和 SI 组的操作时间(中位数[四分位间距])相似(分别为 5.5 [4.75-8] 和 5 [4-7] 分钟;P = 0.137)。DI 组的阻滞起始时间与 SI 组无显著差异(10 [5-17.5] 与 20 [6.25-30] 分钟,P = 0.142)。然而,DI 组的所有 4 根神经阻滞的速度显著更高(94% 与 67%,P = 0.035)。
尽管本研究结果表明 DI 组的 LA 分布在臂丛神经鞘内比 SI 组更均匀,但这并未通过超声或对比放射造影得到证实。
DI 方法可以像单个丛集方法一样轻松进行,并且在所有 4 根神经的阻滞速度方面,与 SI 方法相比,增加了超声引导下 SC-BPB 的一致性。关键词:臂丛神经阻滞、角袋法、丛集法、多次注射、锁骨下阻滞、超声。