• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声引导锁骨上阻滞中两种平面内进针法与一种平面上进针法的随机比较。

A Randomized Comparison Between Two Injections from Two Planes versus Two Injections with a Uniplanar Approach for Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Block.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gachon University College of Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Incheon, South Korea.

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Jeju National University, Jeju, Korea.

出版信息

Pain Physician. 2021 Jan;24(1):E15-E21.

PMID:33400433
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The brachial plexus courses along the lateral to posterior aspect of the subclavian artery located within the supraclavicular region as a trunk or division. Therefore we hypothesized that 2 injections, one along the lateral and one along the posterior aspect of the brachial plexus, could be performed by changing the angle of the ultrasound probe, thereby achieving a 3-dimensional (3-D) even distribution of local anesthetics. Previously, we confirmed the efficacy of this type of approach with that of a single cluster approach. These findings represent a subsequent study.

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to confirm the superiority of block quality achieved by 2 injections from 2 planes (control group; group C) over 2 injections in one plane (experimental group; group E).

STUDY DESIGN

A randomized, controlled trial.

SETTING

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center.

METHODS

In group C (n = 35), the brachial plexus sheath was penetrated in 2 planes by anteriorly altering the angle of the ultrasound probe without changing its position. In group E (n = 35), the upper and lower portions of the brachial plexus sheath were penetrated in one plane. A total of 15 mL of lidocaine 1.5% containing epinephrine (1:200,000) was injected at each point in both groups. The ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block was evaluated every 5 minutes for 30 minutes. The main outcome variables were rates of blockage of all 4 nerves and ulnar nerve sparing.

RESULTS

The rate of blockage of all 4 nerves (median, ulnar, radial, and musculocutaneous nerves) was not significantly different between the 2 groups (94% in group C vs. 86% in group E, respectively; P = 0.232). The number of spared ulnar nerves was similar (1 vs. 5, respectively; P = 0.088). Group procedure times, onset times, and Visual Analog Scale scores for the blocks were similar.

LIMITATIONS

For the 2 plane, 2 injection approach, only 2-D imaging was performed rather than 3-D imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

Two injections performed in one plane offered similar benefits to 2 injections performed in 2 planes. The 2 techniques provided comparable block qualities and could be viewed as equally effective alternatives.

摘要

背景

臂丛神经位于锁骨下区域内的锁骨下动脉的外侧至后侧,作为干或分支走行。因此,我们假设通过改变超声探头的角度,可以进行两次注射,一次在臂丛神经的外侧,一次在臂丛神经的后侧,从而实现局部麻醉剂的三维(3-D)均匀分布。之前,我们已经通过单次集群方法证实了这种方法的有效性。这些发现代表了后续研究。

目的

本研究旨在通过 2 个平面的 2 次注射(对照组;C 组)与 1 个平面的 2 次注射(实验组;E 组)比较,证实阻滞质量的优势。

研究设计

随机对照试验。

设置

加图立大学Gil 医疗中心麻醉与疼痛医学系。

方法

在 C 组(n = 35)中,通过在不改变探头位置的情况下向前改变超声探头的角度,在 2 个平面上穿透臂丛神经鞘。在 E 组(n = 35)中,在上部和下部臂丛神经鞘中在一个平面上穿透。两组均在每个点注射 15 毫升含肾上腺素(1:200,000)的 1.5%利多卡因。在 30 分钟内每 5 分钟评估一次超声引导锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞。主要观察指标为所有 4 根神经和尺神经阻滞率。

结果

两组所有 4 根神经(尺神经、正中神经、桡神经和肌皮神经)的阻滞率无显著差异(C 组分别为 94%和 E 组 86%;P = 0.232)。保留的尺神经数量相似(分别为 1 和 5;P = 0.088)。组间手术时间、起效时间和阻滞的视觉模拟评分相似。

局限性

对于 2 个平面、2 次注射方法,仅进行了 2-D 成像,而不是 3-D 成像。

结论

在一个平面上进行 2 次注射与在 2 个平面上进行 2 次注射具有相似的益处。这两种技术提供了相似的阻滞质量,可以被视为同样有效的替代方法。

相似文献

1
A Randomized Comparison Between Two Injections from Two Planes versus Two Injections with a Uniplanar Approach for Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Block.超声引导锁骨上阻滞中两种平面内进针法与一种平面上进针法的随机比较。
Pain Physician. 2021 Jan;24(1):E15-E21.
2
Sonographic Guidance for Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blocks: Single vs. Double Injection Cluster Approach.超声引导锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞:单点与双点注射簇法比较。
Pain Physician. 2017 Sep;20(6):529-535.
3
Double-injection technique assisted by a nerve stimulator for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block results in better distal sensory-motor block: A randomised controlled trial.神经刺激器引导锁骨上臂丛阻滞的双注射技术可实现更好的远侧感觉-运动阻滞:一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017 Mar;34(3):127-134. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000542.
4
Randomized Comparison of Extrafascial Versus Subfascial Injection of Local Anesthetic During Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block.超声引导下锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞时筋膜外与筋膜下注射局部麻醉药的随机对照研究
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jul-Aug;40(4):337-43. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000264.
5
Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular vs infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks in children.超声引导下儿童锁骨上与锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞
Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 Sep;18(9):838-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02644.x. Epub 2008 Jun 9.
6
Retroclavicular vs supraclavicular brachial plexus block for distal upper limb surgery: a randomised, controlled, single-blinded trial.锁骨下入路与锁骨上入路臂丛神经阻滞用于上肢远端手术:一项随机、对照、单盲试验。
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Apr;122(4):518-524. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.12.022. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
7
A randomized trial comparing axillary block versus targeted intracluster injection supraclavicular block for upper limb surgery.一项比较腋窝阻滞与靶向簇内注射锁骨上阻滞用于上肢手术的随机试验。
Can J Anaesth. 2015 Dec;62(12):1287-94. doi: 10.1007/s12630-015-0485-x. Epub 2015 Oct 2.
8
Comparison of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block techniques: perineural injection versus single or double perivascular infiltration.超声引导下腋路臂丛神经阻滞技术的比较:神经周围注射与单或双血管周围浸润
Yonsei Med J. 2015 May;56(3):838-44. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.3.838.
9
A randomized comparison between double-injection and targeted intracluster-injection ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block.超声引导锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞中双注射法与靶向丛内注射法的随机比较。
Anesth Analg. 2014 Jun;118(6):1363-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000224.
10
Lateral versus medial needle approach for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block: a randomized controlled trial.超声引导锁骨上阻滞中外侧进针与内侧进针的随机对照研究。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011 Jul-Aug;36(4):387-92. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318217ab1f.

引用本文的文献

1
Intertruncal versus classical approach to the ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper extremity surgery: study protocol for a randomized non-inferiority trial.经胸超声引导锁骨上臂丛阻滞用于上肢手术中外侧入路与经典入路的比较:一项随机非劣效性试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Jan 29;23(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06029-x.