Suppr超能文献

3T CMR 健康受试者 T1、T2、T2* 和 ECV 的年龄和性别校正正常参考值。

Age and sex corrected normal reference values of T1, T2 T2* and ECV in healthy subjects at 3T CMR.

机构信息

Pole of Cardiovascular Research (CARD), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc, Université Cathologique, Brussels, Belgium.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc UCL, Av Hippocrate 10/2806, B-1200 Woluwe St., Lambert, Belgium.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017 Sep 21;19(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12968-017-0371-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Myocardial T1, T2 and T2* imaging techniques become increasingly used in clinical practice. While normal values for T1, T2 and T2* times are well established for 1.5 Tesla (T) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), data for 3T remain scarce. Therefore we sought to determine normal reference values relative to gender and age and day to day reproducibility for native T1, T2, T2* mapping and extracellular volume (ECV) at 3T in healthy subjects.

METHODS

After careful exclusion of cardiovascular abnormality, 75 healthy subjects aged 20 to 90 years old (mean 56 ± 19 years, 47% women) underwent left-ventricular T1 (3-(3)-3-(3)-5 MOLLI)), T2 (8 echo- spin echo-imaging) and T2 * (8 echo gradient echo imaging) mapping at 3T CMR (Philips Ingenia 3T and computation of extracellular volume after administration of 0.2 mmol/kg Gadovist). Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility was estimated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Day to day reproducibility was assessed in 10 other volunteers.

RESULTS

Mean myocardial T1 at 3T was 1122 ± 57 ms, T2 52 ± 6 ms, T2* 24 ± 5 ms and ECV 26.6 ± 3.2%. T1 (1139 ± 37 vs 1109 ± 73 ms, p < 0.05) and ECV (28 ± 3 vs 25 ± 2%, p < 0.001), but not T2 (53 ± 8 vs 51 ± 4, p = NS) were significantly greater in age matched women than in men. T1 (r = 0.40, p < 0.001) and ECV (r = 0.37, p = 0.001) increased, while T2 decreased significantly (r = -0.25, p < 0.05) with increasing age. T2* was not influenced by either gender or age. Intra and inter-observer reproducibility was high (ICC ranging between 0.81-0.99), and day to day coefficient of variation was low (6.2% for T1, 7% for T2, 11% for T2* and 11.5% for ECV).

CONCLUSIONS

We provide normal myocardial T2, T2*,T1 and ECV reference values for 3T CMR which are significantly different from those reported at 1.5 Tesla CMR. Myocardial T1 and ECV values are gender and age dependent. Measurement had high inter and intra-observer reproducibility and good day-to-day reproducibility.

摘要

背景

心肌 T1、T2 和 T2成像技术在临床实践中越来越多地被使用。虽然 1.5 特斯拉(T)心血管磁共振(CMR)的 T1、T2 和 T2时间的正常数值已经得到很好的确立,但 3T 的数据仍然很少。因此,我们试图确定相对于性别和年龄的正常参考值,以及在 3T 下健康受试者的原生 T1、T2、T2*映射和细胞外体积(ECV)的日间可重复性。

方法

在仔细排除心血管异常后,75 名年龄在 20 至 90 岁之间(平均 56±19 岁,47%为女性)的健康受试者在 3T CMR(飞利浦 Ingenia 3T)上进行左心室 T1(3-(3)-3-(3)-5 MOLLI))、T2(8 个回波-自旋回波成像)和 T2*(8 个回波梯度回波成像)映射,并计算细胞外体积(在给予 0.2mmol/kg 钆喷酸葡胺后)。通过组内相关系数(ICC)评估观察者内和观察者间的可重复性。另外 10 名志愿者评估了日间可重复性。

结果

3T 时心肌 T1 的平均值为 1122±57ms,T2 为 52±6ms,T2为 24±5ms,ECV 为 26.6±3.2%。T1(1139±37 与 1109±73ms,p<0.05)和 ECV(28±3 与 25±2%,p<0.001)在年龄匹配的女性中明显高于男性,但 T2(53±8 与 51±4,p=NS)则不然。T1(r=0.40,p<0.001)和 ECV(r=0.37,p=0.001)随着年龄的增长而显著增加,而 T2 则显著降低(r=-0.25,p<0.05)。T2不受性别或年龄的影响。观察者内和观察者间的可重复性很高(ICC 范围在 0.81-0.99 之间),日间变异系数很低(T1 为 6.2%,T2 为 7%,T2*为 11%,ECV 为 11.5%)。

结论

我们提供了 3T CMR 心肌 T2、T2*、T1 和 ECV 的正常参考值,这些值与 1.5T CMR 报道的参考值有显著差异。心肌 T1 和 ECV 值与性别和年龄有关。测量具有很高的观察者内和观察者间的可重复性和良好的日间可重复性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11db/5609021/f094fb563202/12968_2017_371_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Age and sex corrected normal reference values of T1, T2 T2* and ECV in healthy subjects at 3T CMR.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017 Sep 21;19(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12968-017-0371-5.
2
Myocardial T-mapping at 3T using saturation-recovery: reference values, precision and comparison with MOLLI.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016 Nov 18;18(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12968-016-0302-x.
8
Clinical evaluation of the Multimapping technique for simultaneous myocardial T and T mapping.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 6;9:960403. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.960403. eCollection 2022.
10
Inter-scanner comparability of Z-scores for native myocardial T1 and T2 mapping.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2024 Summer;26(1):100004. doi: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2023.100004. Epub 2024 Jan 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterization of the Left Ventricular Myocardium in Systemic Sclerosis.
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 8;14(16):5627. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165627.
3
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Markers in Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy - A Prospective Observational Study.
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2025 May 1;28(3):392-399. doi: 10.4103/aian.aian_1001_24. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
4
T1 mapping of the right ventricle in congenital heart disease: a focus on pediatrics.
Pediatr Radiol. 2025 Jun 2. doi: 10.1007/s00247-025-06278-3.
5
Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance reference values ("normal values") in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: 2025 update.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2025;27(1):101853. doi: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2025.101853. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
7
Analysis of myocardial T1, T2, and T2* values by age, sex, and cardiac segments in normal population: a prospective study.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Nov;40(11):2357-2369. doi: 10.1007/s10554-024-03241-5. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
9
Insights into the effects of Friedreich ataxia on the left ventricle using T1 mapping and late gadolinium enhancement.
PLoS One. 2024 May 30;19(5):e0303969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303969. eCollection 2024.
10
Cardiac and Liver Fibrosis Assessed by Multiparametric MRI in Patients with Fontan Circulation.
Pediatr Cardiol. 2025 Apr;46(4):966-975. doi: 10.1007/s00246-024-03522-9. Epub 2024 May 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of 3 T and 1.5 T for T2* magnetic resonance of tissue iron.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016 Jul 8;18(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12968-016-0259-9.
2
Cardiac MRI evaluation of myocardial disease.
Heart. 2016 Sep 15;102(18):1429-35. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-309077. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
3
Validation of T2* in-line analysis for tissue iron quantification at 1.5 T.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016 Apr 27;18(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12968-016-0243-4.
4
Reproducibility of three different cardiac T -mapping sequences at 1.5T.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Nov;44(5):1168-1178. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25258. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
5
T1 Mapping by CMR Imaging: From Histological Validation to Clinical Implication.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jan;9(1):14-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.11.002. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
6
A systematic evaluation of three different cardiac T2-mapping sequences at 1.5 and 3T in healthy volunteers.
Eur J Radiol. 2015 Nov;84(11):2161-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.08.002. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
7
T1 mapping and T2 mapping at 3T for quantifying the area-at-risk in reperfused STEMI patients.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015 Aug 12;17(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12968-015-0173-6.
9
Normal values for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adults and children.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015 Apr 18;17(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12968-015-0111-7.
10
Myocardial T2 mapping reveals age- and sex-related differences in volunteers.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015 Feb 6;17(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12968-015-0118-0.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验