Christensen Karen, Hussein Shereen, Ismail Mohamed
The Department of Sociology, Bergen University, Bergen, Norway.
The Policy Institute, King's College London, Strand, London, WC2R 2LS UK.
Eur J Ageing. 2016 Nov 28;14(3):219-232. doi: 10.1007/s10433-016-0405-0. eCollection 2017 Sep.
Escalating demands for formal long-term care (LTC) result in the reliance on migrant workers in many developed countries. Within Europe, this is currently framed by progressive European immigration policies favouring inter-European mobility. Using the UK and Norway as case studies, this article has two main aims: (1) to document changes in the contribution of European Union (EU) migrants to the LTC sectors in Western Europe, and (2) to gain further understanding of migrants' decision-processes relating to destination and work choices. The UK and Norway provide examples of two European countries with different immigration histories, welfare regimes, labour market characteristics and cultural values, offering a rich comparison platform. The analysis utilizes national workforce datasets and data obtained from migrants working in the LTC sector in the UK and Norway ( = 248) and other stakeholders ( = 136). The analysis establishes a significant increase in the contribution of EU migrants (particularly from Eastern Europe) to the LTC sector in both the UK and Norway despite their different welfare regimes. The findings also highlight how migrant care workers develop rational decision-processes influenced by subjective perspectives of investments and returns within a context of wider structural migration barriers. The latter includes welfare and social care policies framing the conditions for migrants' individual actions.
对正规长期护理(LTC)需求的不断增加,导致许多发达国家依赖移民工人。在欧洲内部,目前这一情况是由有利于欧洲内部流动的进步性欧洲移民政策所构建的。本文以英国和挪威为例进行研究,有两个主要目的:(1)记录欧盟(EU)移民对西欧长期护理部门贡献的变化,以及(2)进一步了解移民在目的地和工作选择方面的决策过程。英国和挪威代表了两个具有不同移民历史、福利制度、劳动力市场特征和文化价值观的欧洲国家,提供了一个丰富的比较平台。分析使用了国家劳动力数据集以及从在英国和挪威长期护理部门工作的移民(n = 248)和其他利益相关者(n = 136)那里获得的数据。分析表明,尽管英国和挪威的福利制度不同,但欧盟移民(特别是来自东欧的移民)对两国长期护理部门的贡献都有显著增加。研究结果还凸显了在更广泛的结构性移民障碍背景下,移民护理工作者如何在投资和回报的主观视角影响下形成理性的决策过程。后者包括构建移民个体行动条件的福利和社会护理政策。