• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

轮椅移动性测试各方面作为衡量轮椅使用者移动性的一种方法的重测信度和结构效度。

Test-retest reliability and construct validity of the Aspects of Wheelchair Mobility Test as a measure of the mobility of wheelchair users.

作者信息

Rispin Karen L, Huff Kara, Wee Joy

机构信息

Department of Biology, LeTourneau University, United States.

School of Rehabilitation Therapy, LeTourneau University, United States.

出版信息

Afr J Disabil. 2017 Sep 8;6:331. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v6i0.331. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.4102/ajod.v6i0.331
PMID:28936412
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5594269/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Aspects of Wheelchair Mobility Test (AWMT) was developed for use in a repeated measures format to provide comparative effectiveness data on mobility facilitated by different wheelchair types. It has been used in preliminary studies to compare the mobility of wheelchairs designed for low-resource areas and is intended to be simple and flexible enough so as to be used in low-technology settings. However, to reliably compare the impact of different types of wheelchairs on the mobility of users, a measure must first be a reliable and valid measure of mobility.

METHODS

This study investigated the test-retest reliability and concurrent validity for the AWMT 2.0 as a measure of mobility. For reliability testing, participants in a low-resource setting completed the tests twice in their own wheelchairs at least one week apart. For concurrent validity, participants also completed the Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire (WST-Q), a related but not identical validated assessment tool.

RESULTS

Concurrent validity was indicated by a significant positive correlation with an r value of 0.7 between the WST-Q capacity score and the AWMT 2.0 score. Test-retest reliability was confirmed by an intraclass correlation coefficient greater than 0.7 between the two trials.

CONCLUSION

Results support the preliminary reliability and validity of the AWMT 2.0, supporting its effectiveness in comparing the mobility provided by different wheelchair types. This information can be used to enable effective use of limited funds for wheelchair selection at individual and organisational scales.

摘要

背景

轮椅移动性测试方面(AWMT)被开发用于重复测量形式,以提供不同类型轮椅所促进的移动性的比较有效性数据。它已在初步研究中用于比较为资源匮乏地区设计的轮椅的移动性,并且旨在足够简单和灵活以便在低技术环境中使用。然而,为了可靠地比较不同类型轮椅对使用者移动性的影响,一种测量方法首先必须是移动性的可靠且有效的测量方法。

方法

本研究调查了AWMT 2.0作为移动性测量方法的重测信度和同时效度。对于信度测试,资源匮乏环境中的参与者在至少相隔一周的时间里在自己的轮椅上完成了两次测试。对于同时效度,参与者还完成了轮椅技能测试问卷(WST-Q),这是一种相关但不完全相同的经过验证的评估工具。

结果

WST-Q能力得分与AWMT 2.0得分之间存在显著正相关,r值为0.7,表明了同时效度。两次测试之间的组内相关系数大于0.7,证实了重测信度。

结论

结果支持AWMT 2.0的初步信度和效度,支持其在比较不同类型轮椅提供的移动性方面的有效性。这些信息可用于在个人和组织层面有效地利用有限资金进行轮椅选择。

相似文献

1
Test-retest reliability and construct validity of the Aspects of Wheelchair Mobility Test as a measure of the mobility of wheelchair users.轮椅移动性测试各方面作为衡量轮椅使用者移动性的一种方法的重测信度和结构效度。
Afr J Disabil. 2017 Sep 8;6:331. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v6i0.331. eCollection 2017.
2
Discriminatory validity of the Aspects of Wheelchair Mobility Test as demonstrated by a comparison of four wheelchair types designed for use in low-resource areas.通过对四种设计用于资源匮乏地区的轮椅类型进行比较,展示轮椅移动性测试各方面的区分效度。
Afr J Disabil. 2017 Sep 8;6:332. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v6i0.332. eCollection 2017.
3
Preliminary test-retest reliability of the Wheelchair Satisfaction Questionnaire.轮椅满意度问卷的初步重测信度。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022 Jul;17(5):555-558. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1800115. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
4
Measurement properties of the Wheelchair Skills Test-Questionnaire for powered wheelchair users.电动轮椅使用者轮椅技能测试问卷的测量属性
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(5):400-6. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2014.984778. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
5
Measurement properties of wheelchair use assessment tools in adults with autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay.常染色体隐性痉挛性共济失调型小脑性共济失调成年患者用轮椅评估工具的测量特性。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022 Nov;17(8):907-915. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1821104. Epub 2020 Sep 26.
6
The Wheelchair Skills Test: a pilot study of a new outcome measure.轮椅技能测试:一项新结局指标的初步研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Jan;83(1):10-8. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.26823.
7
From "wheelchair circuit" to "wheelchair assessment instrument for people with multiple sclerosis": reliability and validity analysis of a test to assess driving skills in manual wheelchair users with multiple sclerosis.从“轮椅回路”到“多发性硬化症患者轮椅评估工具”:评估多发性硬化症手动轮椅使用者驾驶技能的测试的可靠性和有效性分析。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jun;93(6):1052-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.12.025. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
8
Comparison between performances of three types of manual wheelchairs often distributed in low-resource settings.三种常见于资源匮乏地区的手动轮椅性能对比。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015 Jul;10(4):316-22. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2014.1002541. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
9
Utrecht Pediatric Wheelchair Mobility Skills Test: Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness in Youths Using a Manual Wheelchair.乌得勒支小儿轮椅移动技能测试:使用手动轮椅的青少年的可靠性、有效性和反应性。
Phys Ther. 2019 Aug 1;99(8):1098-1106. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzz061.
10
Wheelchair Skills Capacity and Performance of Manual Wheelchair Users With Spinal Cord Injury.脊髓损伤手动轮椅使用者的轮椅技能能力与表现
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Oct;97(10):1761-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.05.015. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Editorial.社论。
Afr J Disabil. 2017 Sep 28;6:423. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v6i0.423. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
Discriminatory validity of the Aspects of Wheelchair Mobility Test as demonstrated by a comparison of four wheelchair types designed for use in low-resource areas.通过对四种设计用于资源匮乏地区的轮椅类型进行比较,展示轮椅移动性测试各方面的区分效度。
Afr J Disabil. 2017 Sep 8;6:332. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v6i0.332. eCollection 2017.
2
Preliminary reliability and internal consistency of the Wheelchair Components Questionnaire for Condition.轮椅部件状况问卷的初步信度和内部一致性
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017 Nov;12(8):852-856. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2016.1277793. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
3
Assessment of physiological performance and perception of pushing different wheelchairs on indoor modular units simulating a surface roughness often encountered in under-resourced settings.在模拟资源匮乏环境中常见表面粗糙度的室内模块化装置上,对推动不同轮椅的生理性能和感知进行评估。
Assist Technol. 2017 Winter;29(4):173-180. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2016.1216473. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
4
Assistive technology in resource-limited environments: a scoping review.资源有限环境中的辅助技术:一项范围综述
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017 Feb;12(2):105-114. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2016.1188170. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
5
Reliability and validity of the Lower Limb Function Questionnaire when completed by young adult orthotic and prosthetic device users.年轻成人矫形和假肢装置使用者填写的下肢功能问卷的信度和效度。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017 Apr;12(3):262-271. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2015.1129458. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
6
Assistive technology access and service delivery in resource-limited environments: introduction to a special issue of Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology.资源有限环境下的辅助技术获取与服务提供:《残疾与康复:辅助技术》特刊引言
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015 Jul;10(4):267-70. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2015.1039607. Epub 2015 May 8.
7
Comparison between performances of three types of manual wheelchairs often distributed in low-resource settings.三种常见于资源匮乏地区的手动轮椅性能对比。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015 Jul;10(4):316-22. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2014.1002541. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
8
A paired outcomes study comparing two pediatric wheelchairs for low-resource settings: the regency pediatric wheelchair and a similarly sized wheelchair made in Kenya.一项配对结局研究比较了两款适用于资源匮乏环境的儿童轮椅:Regency 儿童轮椅和一款在肯尼亚生产的尺寸相近的轮椅。
Assist Technol. 2014 Summer;26(2):88-95. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2013.837847.
9
Evidence-based practice for rehabilitation professionals: concepts and controversies.康复专业人员的循证实践:概念与争议。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Aug;93(8 Suppl):S164-76. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.12.014. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
10
Wheeled mobility (wheelchair) service delivery: scope of the evidence.轮式移动(轮椅)服务提供:证据范围。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jan 17;156(2):141-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-2-201201170-00010.