Rispin Karen L, Huff Kara, Wee Joy
Department of Biology, LeTourneau University, United States.
School of Rehabilitation Therapy, LeTourneau University, United States.
Afr J Disabil. 2017 Sep 8;6:331. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v6i0.331. eCollection 2017.
The Aspects of Wheelchair Mobility Test (AWMT) was developed for use in a repeated measures format to provide comparative effectiveness data on mobility facilitated by different wheelchair types. It has been used in preliminary studies to compare the mobility of wheelchairs designed for low-resource areas and is intended to be simple and flexible enough so as to be used in low-technology settings. However, to reliably compare the impact of different types of wheelchairs on the mobility of users, a measure must first be a reliable and valid measure of mobility.
This study investigated the test-retest reliability and concurrent validity for the AWMT 2.0 as a measure of mobility. For reliability testing, participants in a low-resource setting completed the tests twice in their own wheelchairs at least one week apart. For concurrent validity, participants also completed the Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire (WST-Q), a related but not identical validated assessment tool.
Concurrent validity was indicated by a significant positive correlation with an r value of 0.7 between the WST-Q capacity score and the AWMT 2.0 score. Test-retest reliability was confirmed by an intraclass correlation coefficient greater than 0.7 between the two trials.
Results support the preliminary reliability and validity of the AWMT 2.0, supporting its effectiveness in comparing the mobility provided by different wheelchair types. This information can be used to enable effective use of limited funds for wheelchair selection at individual and organisational scales.
轮椅移动性测试方面(AWMT)被开发用于重复测量形式,以提供不同类型轮椅所促进的移动性的比较有效性数据。它已在初步研究中用于比较为资源匮乏地区设计的轮椅的移动性,并且旨在足够简单和灵活以便在低技术环境中使用。然而,为了可靠地比较不同类型轮椅对使用者移动性的影响,一种测量方法首先必须是移动性的可靠且有效的测量方法。
本研究调查了AWMT 2.0作为移动性测量方法的重测信度和同时效度。对于信度测试,资源匮乏环境中的参与者在至少相隔一周的时间里在自己的轮椅上完成了两次测试。对于同时效度,参与者还完成了轮椅技能测试问卷(WST-Q),这是一种相关但不完全相同的经过验证的评估工具。
WST-Q能力得分与AWMT 2.0得分之间存在显著正相关,r值为0.7,表明了同时效度。两次测试之间的组内相关系数大于0.7,证实了重测信度。
结果支持AWMT 2.0的初步信度和效度,支持其在比较不同类型轮椅提供的移动性方面的有效性。这些信息可用于在个人和组织层面有效地利用有限资金进行轮椅选择。