Stamatopoulou Despina
Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences, University of Crete, 74100, Rethymnon, Crete, Greece.
Cogn Process. 2018 May;19(2):169-186. doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0836-3. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
In this article I will argue for the affective-motivation (background affective attitude or orientation) hypothesis that incubates the aesthetic experience and sets the deep frame of our engagement with art. For this, I look at these microgenetic-early passages of (a) affective perception as mapped into the early emergence of tertiary qualities that underlie a sensorimotor synchronization-a coupling of action, emotion and perception via mirroring that result in dynamic embodied anticipatory control and a feeling of proximity/connectedness and (b) developmental passages that are characterized by spatiotemporal coordination and proximity of the self-other/interactive object and thus structure intentionality, shape experience, in an engaging world of action potentialities forming a background affective attitude. As I will argue these qualitative emergent layers provide the minimal for the aesthetic and the 'feeling into' empathy, or their phenomenological counterparts enable engaged, embodied perception and imagination underlying expressive symbolic communication in interpersonal settings but also for the possibility of art. These layers have an 'echoing' effect (pre-attentive) when we let ourselves to be 'moved' from within by art. The underlying mechanism could be found in the mirroring interface of the upcoming bottom-up and feeding forward anticipatory/predictive (top-down) function of the 'embodied action' representations that are affective, imitative and grounded in the body-affective matrix-carrying experiential affordances and keeping the intersubjective ties between spectator and beheld/object. Given the asymmetry on action tendency between them that affords the 'subordination of the goal-directed action' into to the means of the action's unfolding, aesthetic experiences can go deeply back reconstructing the first level of emerging consciousness where both the aesthetic and ethic became actualities. This could be by itself deeply rewarding, amplifying the experience to the 'edge'. This is a 'hot' cognition self-restructuring related to morality when facing the sufferings-so there might be something special bout art and negative emotions in relation to empathy.
在本文中,我将论证情感动机(背景情感态度或取向)假说,该假说孕育了审美体验,并为我们与艺术的接触设定了深层框架。为此,我考察了这些微观发生的早期阶段:(a)情感感知,它映射到第三性质的早期出现,这些第三性质构成了感觉运动同步的基础——通过镜像实现动作、情感和感知的耦合,从而产生动态的具身预期控制以及亲近感/联系感;(b)发展阶段,其特征是自我与他人/互动对象的时空协调和亲近,从而在一个充满行动可能性的、形成背景情感态度的引人入胜的世界中构建意向性、塑造体验。正如我将论证的,这些质性涌现层次为审美和“感同身受”的共情提供了最低限度的条件,或者说它们的现象学对应物使在人际环境中的具身感知和想象得以参与其中,这不仅是表达性符号交流的基础,也是艺术可能性的基础。当我们被艺术从内心“打动”时,这些层次会产生一种(前注意的)“回响”效应。潜在机制可以在“具身动作”表征的自下而上和前馈预期/预测(自上而下)功能的镜像界面中找到,这些表征具有情感性、模仿性,且基于身体情感矩阵——承载着体验性可供性,并保持观众与被观看者/对象之间的主体间联系。鉴于它们之间在行动倾向方面的不对称性,这种不对称性使得“目标导向行动”从属于行动展开的手段,审美体验能够深入回溯,重构新兴意识的第一层次,在这个层次中,审美和伦理都成为了现实。这本身可能极具回报性,将体验放大到“边缘”。这是一种在面对苦难时与道德相关的“热”认知自我重构——所以在与共情相关的方面,艺术和负面情绪可能有一些特别之处。