Suppr超能文献

注射试验在确定食管气囊导管理想位置中的应用

[Application of injection test in confirming the ideal position of esophageal balloon catheter].

作者信息

Chen Han, Xu Ming, Yang Yanlin, He Xuan, Zhou Jianxin

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China (Chen H, Xu M, He X, Zhou JX); Third Department of Critical Care Medicine, Fujian Provincial Clinical College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, Fujian, China (Chen H is working in Fujian); Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Electric Power Hospital, Beijing 100073, China (Yang YL). Corresponding author: Zhou Jianxin, Email:

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2017 Sep;29(9):783-788. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2017.09.004.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and feasibility of injection test which is used to locate esophageal balloon catheter.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted. The patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) admitted to general intensive care unit (ICU) of Beijing Tiantan Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University from May 2015 and March 2017 were enrolled. The commercially available esophageal balloon catheter was modified to perform injection test. The catheter was withdrawn step by step and the injection test was repeated until the presence disturbance wave presented, which indicated that the balloon had just entered the esophagus. The position where disturbance wave appears was named 0 cm. End-expiratory occlusions were performed at the positions of +15, +10, +5, 0, -5, -10 and -15 cm, respectively, and the changes of esophageal pressure (Pes) and airway pressures (Paw) were measured in the spontaneous breathing and passive ventilation, and the ratio between the changes (ΔPes/ΔPaw) was calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 20 patients were enrolled, of which 15 patients finished both the spontaneous and the passive ventilation parts, and 2 patients finished only the spontaneous part and 3 patients finished only passive part. (1) Disturbance waves could be induced by injection test in all patients. The average depth of disturbance wave in spontaneous breathing was deeper than that in passive ventilation (cm: 42.4±3.8 vs. 41.8±3.3), but there was no significant difference between the two ventilation settings (P = 0.132). No adverse events occurred during the study period. (2) Pes increased with the stepwise withdraw of esophageal catheter, reached the maximal value at +5 cm, and then decreased when the catheter was further withdrawn, no matter in the spontaneous or the passive ventilation. In spontaneous breathing, the ΔPes/ΔPaw was within the ideal range (0.8-1.2) at the positions of 0, -5 and -10 cm. The ΔPes/ΔPaw was closest to unity at the positions of 0 cm (0.98±0.15). The ΔPes/ΔPaw at -15 cm (0.66±0.26) was significantly lower than that at 0 cm (P < 0.05). For passive ventilation, the ΔPes/ΔPaw was within the ideal range at the positions of -5 cm and -10 cm, and the ΔPes/ΔPaw was closest to unity at the positions of -10 cm (0.94±0.12). The ΔPes/ΔPaw at 0 cm and -5 cm was significantly higher than that at -10 cm (1.43±0.31 and 1.12±0.14, respectively); while the ΔPes/ΔPaw at -15 cm (0.68±0.23) was significantly lower than that at -10 cm (all P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Ideal position of the esophageal balloon catheter could be determined quickly and easily by using injection test. The method is safe and clinically feasible.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trials, NCT02446938.

摘要

目的

评估用于定位食管球囊导管的注射试验的安全性和可行性。

方法

进行一项前瞻性研究。纳入2015年5月至2017年3月在首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院综合重症监护病房(ICU)接受有创机械通气(MV)的患者。对市售食管球囊导管进行改良以进行注射试验。逐步回撤导管并重复注射试验,直到出现干扰波,这表明球囊刚进入食管。干扰波出现的位置命名为0 cm。分别在+15、+10、+5、0、-5、-10和-15 cm位置进行呼气末阻断,测量自主呼吸和被动通气时食管压力(Pes)和气道压力(Paw)的变化,并计算变化比值(ΔPes/ΔPaw)。

结果

共纳入20例患者,其中15例患者完成了自主呼吸和被动通气部分,2例患者仅完成了自主呼吸部分,3例患者仅完成了被动通气部分。(1)所有患者通过注射试验均可诱发干扰波。自主呼吸时干扰波的平均深度比被动通气时更深(cm:42.4±3.8对41.8±3.3),但两种通气模式之间无显著差异(P = 0.132)。研究期间未发生不良事件。(2)无论在自主呼吸还是被动通气时,随着食管导管逐步回撤,Pes升高,在+5 cm时达到最大值,然后在导管进一步回撤时降低。在自主呼吸中,0、-5和-10 cm位置的ΔPes/ΔPaw在理想范围内(0.8 - 1.2)。0 cm位置的ΔPes/ΔPaw最接近1(0.98±0.15)。-15 cm位置的ΔPes/ΔPaw(0.66±0.26)显著低于0 cm位置(P < 0.05)。对于被动通气,-5 cm和-10 cm位置的ΔPes/ΔPaw在理想范围内,-10 cm位置的ΔPes/ΔPaw最接近1(0.94±0.12)。0 cm和-5 cm位置的ΔPes/ΔPaw显著高于-10 cm位置(分别为1.43±0.31和1.12±0.14);而-15 cm位置的ΔPes/ΔPaw(0.68±0.23)显著低于-10 cm位置(均P < 0.01)。

结论

使用注射试验可快速、简便地确定食管球囊导管的理想位置。该方法安全且临床可行。

临床试验注册

临床试验,NCT02446938。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验