Suppr超能文献

牛津分类法对IgA肾病中类固醇治疗的反应:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

The response of the Oxford classification to steroid in IgA nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Yang Pingping, Chen Xi, Zeng Lei, Hao Hua, Xu Gaosi

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.

Grade 2013, The Second Clinical Medical College of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.

出版信息

Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 26;8(35):59748-59756. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19574. eCollection 2017 Aug 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The present review is aimed to evaluate the correlation between pathological features and the response to steroid in the patients with IgA nephropathy according to the Oxford classification, mesangial hypercellularity (M), endocapillary hypercellularity (E), segmental glomerulosclerosis (S), tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis (T).

METHODS

We searched Chinese Biomedical Database, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PubMed and MEDLINE with all spellings of "IgA nephropathy", "Oxford Classification", and "steroid".

RESULTS

5 studies with 637 patients were eligible for inclusion. The analysis showed that M1, S1, and T1/2 was strongly associated with the prediction to steroid resistance when compared with M0 [odds ratio (OR) 1.89, 95% confidence interval () 1.01 - 3.56, < 0.05], S0 (OR 2.24, 95% 0.99 - 5.08, = 0.05) and T0 (OR 2.16, 95% 1.29 - 3.63, = 0.004) respectively. There is no difference in steroid sensitivity between E0 and E1 ( = 0.55). The pooled OR of steroid resistance for E1 versus T1/2 is 0.50 ( = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

IgA nephropathy patients with serious pathological changes (M1, S1, and T1/2) were more resistant to steroid than slight ones (M0, S0, and T0), and E1 is better response to steroid therapy than T1/2.

摘要

背景

本综述旨在根据牛津分类法评估IgA肾病患者的病理特征与对类固醇反应之间的相关性,包括系膜细胞增生(M)、毛细血管内细胞增生(E)、节段性肾小球硬化(S)、肾小管萎缩和间质纤维化(T)。

方法

我们在中国生物医学数据库、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、PubMed和MEDLINE中检索了“IgA肾病”“牛津分类法”和“类固醇”的所有拼写形式。

结果

5项研究共637例患者符合纳入标准。分析表明,与M0相比,M1、S1和T1/2与类固醇抵抗的预测密切相关[比值比(OR)1.89,95%置信区间(CI)1.01 - 3.56,P<0.05],与S0相比(OR 2.24,95%CI 0.99 - 5.08,P = 0.05),与T0相比(OR 2.16,95%CI 1.29 - 3.63,P = 0.004)。E0和E1之间的类固醇敏感性无差异(P = 0.55)。E1与T1/2相比,类固醇抵抗的合并OR为0.50(P = 0.04)。

结论

病理改变严重(M1、S1和T1/2)的IgA肾病患者比轻微改变(M0、S0和T0)的患者对类固醇更耐药,且E1对类固醇治疗的反应优于T1/2。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e65e/5601774/eb66bd9ed01f/oncotarget-08-59748-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验