Krefting Research Centre, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Krefting Research Centre, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018 Jun;141(6):2256-2264.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.07.047. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
The prevalence of asthma severity is not well described at a population level.
We sought to determine the prevalence of phenotypic signs of asthma severity among asthmatic patients in a general population and to describe risk factors for asthma severity.
We performed an epidemiologic study conducted between 2008 and 2012 (West Sweden Asthma Study). A postal questionnaire was sent to a random population (n = 30,000) in west Sweden, with 18,087 responses. A total of 2,006 subjects were carefully phenotyped. Only subjects with "active asthma" (symptoms or medication in the last year, n = 744) were analyzed in this study to determine the degree of severity of the disease within an asthma cohort. Phenotypes of severity were calculated based on (1) multiple symptoms during the day despite ongoing use of asthma medications, (2) FEV of less than 70% of predicted value, (3) daily or almost daily use of rescue medications, (4) nighttime symptoms once a week or more, and (5) oral corticosteroid use/emergency department visits. Asthmatic patients were grouped as having nonsevere disease, 1 sign of severity, or 2 or more signs of severity.
A total of 36.2% of asthmatic patients expressed at least 1 sign of asthma severity, and 13.2% had 2 or more signs. The group with 2 or more signs was older in age and had higher body mass index, a higher rate of tobacco smoking, and lower lung function. Bronchial hyperreactivity, airway inflammation, and sensitization were significantly different among the 3 groups. At a population level, the prevalence of asthma severity was 3.1% for 1 sign and 1.3% for at least 2 signs.
More than 1 in 3 asthmatic patients show at least 1 sign of asthma severity. The phenotypes of asthma severity are highly diverse, which is important to consider when implementing personalized medicine in asthmatic patients.
哮喘严重程度的流行情况在人群中尚未得到充分描述。
我们旨在确定一般人群中哮喘患者出现表型哮喘严重程度征象的流行率,并描述哮喘严重程度的相关危险因素。
我们进行了一项 2008 年至 2012 年期间(瑞典西部哮喘研究)开展的流行病学研究。我们向瑞典西部的一个随机人群(n=30000)寄出了一份邮寄问卷,共收到 18087 份回复。共有 2006 名受试者被仔细表型化。仅在这项研究中分析了患有“活动性哮喘”(过去一年有症状或使用药物,n=744)的受试者,以确定哮喘队列内疾病的严重程度程度。严重程度的表型是基于(1)尽管持续使用哮喘药物,但仍有日间多种症状,(2)FEV 低于预计值的 70%,(3)每天或几乎每天使用急救药物,(4)每周一次或以上夜间症状,和(5)口服皮质类固醇的使用/急诊就诊来计算的。将哮喘患者分为非严重疾病、1 种严重程度征象或 2 种或更多严重程度征象。
共有 36.2%的哮喘患者至少表现出 1 种哮喘严重程度征象,13.2%的患者有 2 种或更多征象。有 2 种或更多征象的组年龄较大,体重指数较高,吸烟率较高,肺功能较低。三组之间的支气管高反应性、气道炎症和致敏情况明显不同。在人群层面,1 种征象的哮喘严重程度的流行率为 3.1%,至少 2 种征象的哮喘严重程度的流行率为 1.3%。
超过 1/3 的哮喘患者至少表现出 1 种哮喘严重程度征象。哮喘严重程度的表型高度多样化,在对哮喘患者实施个体化治疗时,这一点很重要。