Institute of Medical Psychology and Systems Neuroscience, Germany.
Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignal Analysis, Germany.
Neuroimage. 2017 Dec;163:276-285. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.034. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
In recent years continuous flash suppression (CFS) has become a popular "blinding" technique for the investigation of nonconscious affective processing since it elicits potent and long-lasting suppression of conscious visual perception. While the majority of studies provides some positive evidence for nonconscious affective processing, there are also studies reporting their absence. Several methodological variations may give rise to this discrepancy: with respect to the experimental paradigm these variations pertain to the likelihood of residual stimulus visibility on the level of individual participants and single trials. Concerning the statistical analysis they relate to the procedures applied to assess whether detection performance is at chance level and whether the outcome measure does or does not depend on the affective stimulus category. In the present study we determined individual eye dominance and individual stimulus contrast in pretests, measured objective and subjective awareness online and applied Bayesian statistics to estimate the likelihood for the null hypothesis. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were measured while participants were subjected to fearful, happy, and neutral faces in a conscious as well as in a nonconscious CFS condition. In the conscious condition, expected emotion effects were observed in the ERP components N170/EPN and LPP. However, despite high statistical power, no effects of emotional expression were found in the nonconscious condition and the absence of nonconscious affective processing under the tested conditions was substantially more likely than its presence. We discuss whether CFS disrupts affective processing completely if thoroughly applied or whether positive and negative findings should be integrated under a two-threshold framework of nonconscious processing.
近年来,连续闪光抑制(CFS)已成为一种流行的“致盲”技术,用于研究无意识情感加工,因为它能产生强烈而持久的有意识视觉感知抑制。虽然大多数研究提供了一些无意识情感加工的积极证据,但也有研究报告称不存在这种现象。一些方法学上的变化可能导致了这种差异:在实验范式方面,这些变化涉及到个体参与者和单个试验中残留刺激可见性的可能性;在统计分析方面,这些变化涉及到用于评估检测性能是否处于随机水平的程序,以及结果衡量标准是否取决于情感刺激类别。在本研究中,我们在预测试中确定了个体的眼优势和个体刺激对比度,在线测量了客观和主观意识,并应用贝叶斯统计来估计零假设的可能性。当参与者在有意识和无意识 CFS 条件下接受恐惧、快乐和中性面孔时,我们测量了事件相关电位(ERPs)。在有意识的条件下,观察到了 ERP 成分 N170/EPN 和 LPP 的预期情绪效应。然而,尽管统计功效很高,但在无意识条件下没有发现情绪表达的影响,在测试条件下不存在无意识情感处理的可能性远远大于存在的可能性。我们讨论了如果彻底应用 CFS 是否会完全破坏情感处理,或者是否应该在无意识处理的双阈值框架下整合积极和消极的发现。