Institute of Medical Psychology and Systems Neuroscience, University of Muenster, Münster, Germany.
Otto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Muenster, Münster, Germany.
Psychophysiology. 2020 Sep;57(9):e13597. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13597. Epub 2020 May 10.
Prioritized processing of fearful compared to neutral faces is reflected in behavioral advantages such as lower detection thresholds, but also in enhanced early and late event-related potentials (ERPs). Behavioral advantages have recently been associated with the spatial frequency spectrum of fearful faces, better fitting the human contrast sensitivity function than the spectrum of neutral faces. However, it is unclear whether and to which extent early and late ERP differences are due to low-level spatial frequency spectrum information or high-level representations of the facial expression. In this pre-registered EEG study (N = 38), the effects of fearful-specific spatial frequencies on event-related ERPs were investigated by presenting faces with fearful and neutral expressions whose spatial frequency spectra were manipulated so as to contain either the average power spectra of neutral, fearful, or both expressions combined. We found an enlarged N170 to fearful versus neutral faces, not interacting with spatial frequency. Interactions of emotional expression and spatial frequencies were observed for the P1 and Early Posterior Negativity (EPN). For both components, larger emotion differences were observed when the spectrum contained neutral as opposed to fearful frequencies. Importantly, for the EPN, fearful and neutral expressions did not differ anymore when inserting fearful frequencies into neutral expressions, whereas typical emotion differences were found when faces contained average or neutral frequencies. Our findings show that N170 emotional modulations are unaffected by expression-specific spatial frequencies. However, expression-specific spatial frequencies alter early and mid-latency ERPs. Most notably, the EPN to neutral expressions is boosted by adding fearful spectra-but not vice versa.
与中性面孔相比,对恐惧面孔的优先处理反映在行为优势上,例如更低的检测阈值,但也反映在增强的早期和晚期事件相关电位(ERP)上。最近,行为优势与恐惧面孔的空间频率谱有关,与中性面孔的空间频率谱相比,恐惧面孔的空间频率谱更符合人类对比敏感度函数。然而,目前尚不清楚早期和晚期 ERP 差异是否以及在何种程度上归因于低水平的空间频率谱信息或面部表情的高水平表示。在这项预先注册的 EEG 研究(N=38)中,通过呈现具有恐惧和中性表情的面孔,研究了恐惧特异性空间频率对面部表情相关 ERP 的影响,这些面孔的空间频率谱被操纵,以包含中性、恐惧或两者结合的平均功率谱。我们发现,与中性相比,恐惧面孔的 N170 增大,与空间频率无关。情绪表达和空间频率的相互作用表现在 P1 和早期后负波(EPN)上。对于这两个成分,当谱中包含中性而不是恐惧频率时,情绪差异更大。重要的是,对于 EPN,当将恐惧频率插入中性表情时,恐惧和中性表情之间不再有差异,而当面部表情包含平均或中性频率时,则会发现典型的情绪差异。我们的研究结果表明,N170 的情绪调制不受表情特异性空间频率的影响。然而,表情特异性空间频率改变了早期和中期潜伏期的 ERP。最值得注意的是,通过添加恐惧谱,可以增强中性表情的 EPN-但反之则不然。