Suppr超能文献

分离视觉检测效果的有意识和无意识影响。

Dissociating conscious and unconscious influences on visual detection effects.

机构信息

Brain and Cognition, Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Nat Hum Behav. 2021 May;5(5):612-624. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-01004-5. Epub 2021 Jan 4.

Abstract

The scope of unconscious processing is highly debated, with recent studies showing that even high-level functions such as perceptual integration and category-based attention occur unconsciously. For example, upright faces that are suppressed from awareness through interocular suppression break into awareness more quickly than inverted faces. Similarly, verbal object cues boost otherwise invisible objects into awareness. Here, we replicate these findings, but find that they reflect a general difference in detectability not specific to interocular suppression. To dissociate conscious and unconscious influences on visual detection effects, we use an additional discrimination task to rule out conscious processes as a cause for these differences. Results from this detection-discrimination dissociation paradigm reveal that, while face orientation is processed unconsciously, category-based attention requires awareness. These findings provide insights into the function of conscious perception and offer an experimental approach for mapping out the scope and limits of unconscious processing.

摘要

无意识加工的范围存在广泛争议,最近的研究表明,即使是高级功能,如知觉整合和基于类别注意,也可能是无意识发生的。例如,通过眼间抑制从意识中抑制的直立面孔比倒置面孔更快地闯入意识。同样,言语物体线索会将原本不可见的物体提升到意识中。在这里,我们复制了这些发现,但发现它们反映的是一种一般的可检测性差异,而不是特定于眼间抑制的差异。为了将视觉检测效果的有意识和无意识影响分开,我们使用额外的辨别任务排除了有意识过程作为这些差异的原因。来自这个检测-辨别分离范式的结果表明,虽然面孔方向是无意识处理的,但基于类别注意需要意识。这些发现为意识知觉的功能提供了新的见解,并为描绘无意识加工的范围和局限性提供了一种实验方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验