Nielsen Jannie, Bahendeka Silver K, Whyte Susan R, Meyrowitsch Dan W, Bygbjerg Ib C, Witte Daniel R
Department of Public Health, Global Health Section, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
St Francis Hospital Nsambya, Kampala, Uganda.
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 21;7(9):e015214. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015214.
Prevention of type 2 diabetes (T2D) has been successfully established in randomised clinical trials. However, the best methods for the translation of this evidence into effective population-wide interventions remain unclear. To assess whether households could be a target for T2D prevention and screening, we investigated the resemblance of T2D risk factors at household level and by type of familial dyadic relationship in a rural Ugandan community.
This cross-sectional household-based study included 437 individuals ≥13 years of age from 90 rural households in south-western Uganda. Resemblance in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), anthropometry, blood pressure, fitness status and sitting time were analysed using a general mixed model with random effects (by household or dyad) to calculate household intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and dyadic regression coefficients. Logistic regression with household as a random effect was used to calculate the ORs for individuals having a condition or risk factor if another household member had the same condition.
The strongest degree of household member resemblances in T2D risk factors was seen in relation to fitness status (ICC=0.24), HbA1c (ICC=0.18) and systolic blood pressure (ICC=0.11). Regarding dyadic resemblance, the highest standardised regression coefficient was seen in fitness status for spouses (0.54, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.76), parent-offspring (0.41, 95% CI 0.28 0.54) and siblings (0.41, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.57). Overall, parent-offspring and sibling pairs were the dyads with strongest resemblance, followed by spouses.
The marked degree of resemblance in T2D risk factors at household level and between spouses, parent-offspring and sibling dyads suggest that shared behavioural and environmental factors may influence risk factor levels among cohabiting individuals, which point to the potential of the household setting for screening and prevention of T2D.
2型糖尿病(T2D)的预防已在随机临床试验中成功确立。然而,将这一证据转化为有效的全人群干预措施的最佳方法仍不明确。为了评估家庭是否可以成为T2D预防和筛查的目标,我们在乌干达农村社区调查了家庭层面以及按家庭二元关系类型划分的T2D危险因素的相似性。
这项基于家庭的横断面研究纳入了乌干达西南部90个农村家庭中437名年龄≥13岁的个体。使用具有随机效应(按家庭或二元组)的一般混合模型分析糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、人体测量学、血压、健康状况和久坐时间的相似性,以计算家庭组内相关系数(ICC)和二元回归系数。以家庭为随机效应的逻辑回归用于计算如果另一名家庭成员患有相同疾病,个体患有某种疾病或危险因素的比值比(OR)。
在T2D危险因素方面,家庭成员之间相似程度最强的是健康状况(ICC = 0.24)、HbA1c(ICC = 0.18)和收缩压(ICC = 0.11)。关于二元相似性,配偶(0.54,95%CI 0.32至0.76)、亲子关系(0.41,95%CI 0.28至0.54)和兄弟姐妹(0.41,95%CI 0.25至0.57)在健康状况方面的标准化回归系数最高。总体而言,亲子对和兄弟姐妹对是相似性最强的二元组,其次是配偶。
家庭层面以及配偶、亲子和兄弟姐妹二元组之间T2D危险因素的显著相似程度表明,共同的行为和环境因素可能会影响同居个体的危险因素水平,这表明家庭环境在T2D筛查和预防方面具有潜力。