• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

过去和当前刺激的控制取决于辨别性强化物差异。

Control by past and present stimuli depends on the discriminated reinforcer differential.

作者信息

Cowie Sarah, Davison Michael, Elliffe Douglas

机构信息

The University of Auckland.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 2017 Sep;108(2):184-203. doi: 10.1002/jeab.268. Epub 2017 Jul 23.

DOI:10.1002/jeab.268
PMID:28940396
Abstract

The extent to which a stimulus exerts control over behavior depends largely on its informativeness. However, when reinforcers have discriminative properties, they often exert less control over behavior than do other less reliable stimuli such as elapsed time. We investigated why less reliable cues in the present often overshadow stimulus control by more reliable cues presented in the recent past, by manipulating the reliability and duration of stimulus presentations. Five pigeons worked on a modified concurrent schedule in which the location of the response that produced the last reinforcer was a discriminative stimulus for the likely time and location of the next reinforcer. In some conditions, either the location of the previous reinforcer, or the location of the next reinforcer, was signaled by a red key light. This stimulus was either Brief, occurring for 10 s starting a fixed time after the most recent reinforcer, or Extended, being present at all times between food deliveries. Brief and Extended stimuli that signaled the same information had a similar effect on choice when they were present, but control by Brief stimuli weakened as time since stimulus offset elapsed. Control was divided among stimuli in the present and recent past according to the apparent reliability of the information signaled about the next reinforcer. More reliable stimuli in the present degraded, but did not erase, control by less reliable stimuli presented in the recent past. Thus, we conclude that less reliable stimuli in the present control behavior to a greater degree than do more reliable stimuli in the recent past because these more reliable stimuli are forgotten, and hence their relation to the likely availability of food cannot be discriminated.

摘要

一种刺激对行为施加控制的程度在很大程度上取决于其信息量。然而,当强化物具有辨别特性时,它们对行为的控制往往比其他不太可靠的刺激(如过去的时间流逝)要弱。我们通过操纵刺激呈现的可靠性和持续时间,研究了为何当前不太可靠的线索常常会掩盖近期呈现的更可靠线索对刺激的控制。五只鸽子在一个经过修改的并发程序上工作,在该程序中,产生最后一次强化物的反应位置是下一次强化物可能出现的时间和位置的辨别性刺激。在某些条件下,前一次强化物的位置或下一次强化物的位置由红色按键灯发出信号。这种刺激要么是短暂的,在最近一次强化物出现后的固定时间开始持续10秒,要么是持续的,在食物投递之间一直存在。当短暂和持续刺激传达相同信息时,它们在出现时对选择有类似的影响,但随着刺激消失后的时间流逝,短暂刺激的控制作用会减弱。根据关于下一次强化物的信息的明显可靠性,控制在当前和近期的刺激之间进行分配。当前更可靠的刺激会削弱但不会消除近期呈现的不太可靠刺激的控制作用。因此,我们得出结论,当前不太可靠的刺激比近期更可靠的刺激对行为的控制程度更大,因为这些更可靠的刺激被遗忘了,因此它们与食物可能可得性的关系无法被辨别。

相似文献

1
Control by past and present stimuli depends on the discriminated reinforcer differential.过去和当前刺激的控制取决于辨别性强化物差异。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2017 Sep;108(2):184-203. doi: 10.1002/jeab.268. Epub 2017 Jul 23.
2
A model for food and stimulus changes that signal time-based contingency changes.一种用于食物和刺激变化的模型,这些变化标志着基于时间的意外情况变化。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Nov;102(3):289-310. doi: 10.1002/jeab.105. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
3
Does overall reinforcer rate affect discrimination of time-based contingencies?强化物的总体比率是否会影响基于时间的应急情况的辨别?
J Exp Anal Behav. 2016 May;105(3):393-408. doi: 10.1002/jeab.204. Epub 2016 May 6.
4
Divided stimulus control: Which key did you peck, or what color was it?分散刺激控制:你啄了哪个按键,或者它是什么颜色?
J Exp Anal Behav. 2018 Jan;109(1):107-124. doi: 10.1002/jeab.295. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
5
Contingent stimuli signal subsequent reinforcer ratios.条件刺激信号表明后续强化物的比例。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 Jul;96(1):39-61. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2011.96-39.
6
Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Choice is primarily based on the value of the conditioned reinforcer rather than overall reinforcement rate.鸽子的次优选择:选择主要基于条件性强化物的价值,而非整体强化率。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2016 Apr;42(2):212-20. doi: 10.1037/xan0000092. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
7
Stimulus control depends on the subjective value of the outcome.刺激控制取决于结果的主观价值。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2020 Sep;114(2):216-232. doi: 10.1002/jeab.622. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
8
Environment tracking and signal following in a reinforcer-ratio reversal procedure.强化比率反转程序中的环境追踪与信号跟随
Behav Processes. 2018 Dec;157:208-224. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
9
Timing compound stimuli: Relative reinforcer probabilities divide stimulus control in the multiple peak procedure.复合刺激的定时:在多峰程序中,相对强化物概率划分刺激控制。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2020 Apr;46(2):124-138. doi: 10.1037/xan0000233. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
10
Pigeons prefer discriminative stimuli independently of the overall probability of reinforcement and of the number of presentations of the conditioned reinforcer.鸽子偏好辨别性刺激,而与强化的总体概率以及条件性强化物的呈现次数无关。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2012 Oct;38(4):446-52. doi: 10.1037/a0030321.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic Interactions between Induction and Reinforcement in the Organization of Behavior.行为组织中诱导与强化之间的动态交互作用。
Perspect Behav Sci. 2025 Jun 3;48(2):315-339. doi: 10.1007/s40614-025-00453-5. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
On the "Strength" of Behavior.论行为的“强度”
Perspect Behav Sci. 2020 Nov 10;43(4):677-696. doi: 10.1007/s40614-020-00269-5. eCollection 2020 Dec.
3
Generalizing from the Past, Choosing the Future.从过去总结经验,选择未来。
Perspect Behav Sci. 2020 Jun 11;43(2):245-258. doi: 10.1007/s40614-020-00257-9. eCollection 2020 Jun.