Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
Semel Institute for Neuroscience at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States; VA Greater Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
J Psychiatr Res. 2017 Dec;95:299-307. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
This study compares the efficacy and tolerability of olanzapine versus risperidone among patients with schizophrenia who are established in outpatient psychiatric care and entering supported employment. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial was conducted among 107 outpatients with schizophrenia, who were cross-titrated to flexible dose risperidone or olanzapine over 2 weeks. Clinical endpoints included time to hospitalization and persistence on assigned medication. Weight, laboratory tests, psychopathology, neurologic side effects, social adjustment and role functioning were assessed at 3-6 month intervals. Data were analyzed first by randomized treatment, and then reassessed controlling for prior medication treatment. The proportion of patients on assigned medication at 18 months was 30.9% for risperidone and 37.3% for olanzapine. Mean doses were 6.4 ± 3.2 mg daily for risperidone, and 17.0 ± 5.0 mg daily for olanzapine. The groups did not differ significantly in time to medication discontinuation, first hospitalization or first employment. There were few differences in psychopathology, laboratory, or neurological assessments between groups at 18 months. Patients randomized to olanzapine gained modestly more weight. Controlling for pre-randomization medication suggested improvement in some aspects of psychopathology from switching medications; however, switching from olanzapine to risperidone was associated with more hospitalizations. Risperidone and olanzapine have similar efficacy and tolerability in patients with schizophrenia who are participating in supported employment. Randomization to olanzapine was associated with more weight gain, but randomization from olanzapine to risperidone appeared to be associated with a greater likelihood of hospitalization. Careful monitoring of metabolic effects and participation in supported employment may have contributed to minimal weight gain and metabolic effects.
这项研究比较了奥氮平与利培酮在已接受门诊精神科治疗并开始接受支持性就业的精神分裂症患者中的疗效和耐受性。一项多中心、随机、双盲试验纳入了 107 名精神分裂症门诊患者,他们在 2 周内交叉滴定至利培酮或奥氮平的灵活剂量。临床终点包括住院时间和分配药物的持续时间。体重、实验室检查、精神病理学、神经副作用、社会适应和角色功能在 3-6 个月的间隔内进行评估。数据首先按随机治疗进行分析,然后在控制先前药物治疗的情况下重新评估。在 18 个月时,接受分配药物治疗的患者比例分别为利培酮组的 30.9%和奥氮平组的 37.3%。利培酮的平均剂量为 6.4 ± 3.2 mg/天,奥氮平的平均剂量为 17.0 ± 5.0 mg/天。两组在停药时间、首次住院或首次就业方面无显著差异。两组在 18 个月时的精神病理学、实验室或神经评估方面也几乎没有差异。随机分配至奥氮平组的患者体重略有增加。在药物调整前进行随机分组表明,从药物调整中改善了一些方面的精神病理学;然而,从奥氮平转换为利培酮与更多的住院有关。奥氮平和利培酮在参加支持性就业的精神分裂症患者中具有相似的疗效和耐受性。随机分配至奥氮平与体重增加相关,但从奥氮平随机转换为利培酮与住院的可能性增加相关。对代谢效应的仔细监测和参与支持性就业可能有助于最小化体重增加和代谢效应。