Suppr超能文献

元认知信念作为心理预测因素对社交功能的影响:一项针对有精神病风险的年轻人的研究。

Metacognitive beliefs as psychological predictors of social functioning: An investigation with young people at risk of psychosis.

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.

School of Health Sciences, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2018 Apr;262:520-526. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.09.037. Epub 2017 Sep 14.

Abstract

Poor social functioning has been found to be present in those at risk for psychosis. This study aimed to examine metacognitive beliefs as potential predictors of structured activity (measure of social functioning) in those with an At Risk Mental State (ARMS). Regression and correlation analyses were conducted. The sample included 109 young people. Age was found to be positively correlated to structured activity. Metacognitive beliefs concerning uncontrollability and danger of worry were found to negatively predict structured activity. This was after controlling for age, gender, treatment allocation, cognitive schemas, positive symptom severity, social anxiety, and depression. Metacognitive danger items were most important. Age was the only control variable found to be an independent predictor of structured activity in the regression model, despite negative bi-variate relationships with structured activity found across three cognitive schema subscales and social anxiety. This is the first study to find that higher negative metacognitive beliefs about uncontrollability and danger predict lower social functioning in an ARMS sample, and that the perception of thoughts being dangerous was of particular importance. Psychological interventions should consider targeting this metacognitive dimension to increase social functioning. Future longitudinal research is required to strengthen findings in this area.

摘要

研究发现,有精神病风险的人存在社交功能不良的情况。本研究旨在探讨元认知信念是否可以作为有风险精神状态(ARMS)人群结构化活动(社交功能的衡量指标)的潜在预测因素。进行了回归和相关分析。该样本包括 109 名年轻人。研究发现,年龄与结构化活动呈正相关。元认知信念中的不可控性和担忧的危险性与结构化活动呈负相关。这是在控制了年龄、性别、治疗分配、认知图式、阳性症状严重程度、社交焦虑和抑郁之后得出的结果。元认知危险项目是最重要的。尽管在三个认知图式分量表和社交焦虑方面与结构化活动存在负相关关系,但年龄是回归模型中唯一发现可独立预测结构化活动的控制变量。这是第一项发现,较高的不可控性和危险性的负性元认知信念可预测 ARMS 样本中较低的社交功能,并且认为思维具有危险性尤其重要。心理干预应考虑针对这一元认知维度来提高社交功能。需要进行未来的纵向研究来加强该领域的发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72a3/5884305/aba4b6cc070f/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Metacognitive beliefs as psychological predictors of social functioning: An investigation with young people at risk of psychosis.
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Apr;262:520-526. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.09.037. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
2
The role of unhelpful metacognitive beliefs in psychosis: Relationships with positive symptoms and negative affect.
Psychiatry Res. 2016 Dec 30;246:401-406. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.10.029. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
5
Metacognitive beliefs mediate the effect of emotional abuse on depressive and psychotic symptoms in severe mental disorders.
Psychol Med. 2017 Oct;47(13):2323-2333. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717000848. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
6
The relationship between negative metacognitive thoughts, pain catastrophizing and adjustment to chronic pain.
Eur J Pain. 2018 Apr;22(4):756-762. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1160. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
8
Metacognitive beliefs and their relationship with anxiety and depression in physical illnesses: A systematic review.
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 10;15(9):e0238457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238457. eCollection 2020.
9
Testing relationships between metacognitive beliefs, anxiety and depression in cardiac and cancer patients: Are they transdiagnostic?
J Psychosom Res. 2019 Sep;124:109738. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.109738. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
10
The relationship between metacognitive beliefs and symptoms in eating disorders.
Psychiatriki. 2020 Jul-Sep;31(3):225-235. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2020.313.225.

引用本文的文献

1
Social Functioning Interventions in Psychosis: A Systematic Review.
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2025 May-Jun;32(3):e70090. doi: 10.1002/cpp.70090.
2
Decision making and its correlates in recurrent depressive disorder.
Indian J Psychiatry. 2023 Nov;65(11):1158-1164. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_633_23. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
4
The profile of unusual beliefs associated with metacognitive thinking and attributional styles.
Psych J. 2022 Jun;11(3):296-309. doi: 10.1002/pchj.528. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
5
Persons with first episode psychosis have distinct profiles of social cognition and metacognition.
NPJ Schizophr. 2021 Dec 9;7(1):61. doi: 10.1038/s41537-021-00187-8.
7
Metacognitive Rating Scale: A Study Applying a Korean Translation to Individuals with Schizophrenia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 25;18(13):6853. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136853.
8
Metacognitive Therapy for Work-Related Stress: A Feasibility Study.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 May 31;12:668245. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.668245. eCollection 2021.
9
Identifying Psychological Perceptions of People Ignoring the Novel COVID-19 Warnings: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis in Isfahan, Iran.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2023 Dec;57(4):1402-1417. doi: 10.1007/s12124-021-09608-w. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
10
Do intuitive ideas of the qualities that should characterize involuntary and voluntary memories affect their classification?
Psychol Res. 2022 Feb;86(1):170-195. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01465-3. Epub 2021 Feb 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Metacognitive beliefs in the at-risk mental state: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Behav Res Ther. 2017 Mar;90:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.12.004. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
2
A meta-analysis of metacognitive beliefs as implicated in the self-regulatory executive function model in clinical psychosis.
Schizophr Res. 2017 Jan;179:75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.09.032. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
3
Childhood adversity and social functioning in psychosis: Exploring clinical and cognitive mediators.
Psychiatry Res. 2016 Apr 30;238:25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
4
Sources of clinical distress in young people at ultra high risk of psychosis.
Schizophr Res. 2015 Jun;165(1):15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.03.022. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
5
Comparing time use in individuals at different stages of psychosis and a non-clinical comparison group.
Schizophr Res. 2015 Feb;161(2-3):188-93. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.12.011. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
7
Core schemas across the continuum of psychosis: a comparison of clinical and non-clinical groups.
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2014 Nov;42(6):718-30. doi: 10.1017/S1352465813000593. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
8
Metacognitive beliefs in adolescents with an at-risk mental state for psychosis.
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;8(1):82-6. doi: 10.1111/eip.12052. Epub 2013 May 20.
9
Metacognitive functioning in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis.
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2014 Sep;42(5):526-34. doi: 10.1017/S1352465813000167. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
10
Early traumatic experiences in those at clinical high risk for psychosis.
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;7(3):300-5. doi: 10.1111/eip.12020. Epub 2013 Jan 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验