Suppr超能文献

元认知评定量表:一项将韩语翻译版应用于精神分裂症患者的研究。

Metacognitive Rating Scale: A Study Applying a Korean Translation to Individuals with Schizophrenia.

作者信息

Han Mihwa, Lee Kyunghee, Kim Mijung, Heo Youngjin, Choi Hyunseok

机构信息

Department of Nursing Science, Sunlin University, Pohang 37560, Korea.

College of Nursing, Keimyung University, Daegu 42601, Korea.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 25;18(13):6853. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136853.

Abstract

Metacognition is a higher-level cognition of identifying one's own mental status, beliefs, and intentions. This research comprised a survey of 184 people with schizophrenia to verify the reliability of the metacognitive rating scale (MCRS) with the revised and supplemented metacognitions questionnaire (MCQ) to measure the dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs of people with schizophrenia by adding the concepts of anger and anxiety. This study analyzed the data using principal component analysis and the varimax method for exploratory factor analysis. To examine the reliability of the extracted factors, Cronbach's α was used. According to the results, reliability was ensured for five factors: positive beliefs about worry, negative beliefs about uncontrollability and danger of worry, cognitive confidence, need for control, and cognitive self-consciousness. The negative beliefs about uncontrollability and danger of worry and the need for control on anger expression, which were both added in this research, exhibited the highest correlation (r = 0.727). The results suggest that the MCRS is a reliable tool to measure the metacognition of people with schizophrenia.

摘要

元认知是对自身心理状态、信念和意图的一种高级认知。本研究对184名精神分裂症患者进行了调查,以验证元认知评定量表(MCRS)的可靠性,该量表采用修订和补充后的元认知问卷(MCQ),通过增加愤怒和焦虑的概念来测量精神分裂症患者功能失调的元认知信念。本研究使用主成分分析和用于探索性因素分析的方差最大化方法对数据进行分析。为检验提取因素的可靠性,使用了克朗巴哈α系数。结果显示,五个因素的可靠性得到了保证:对担忧的积极信念、对担忧的不可控性和危险性的消极信念、认知信心、控制需求以及认知自我意识。本研究中新增的对担忧的不可控性和危险性的消极信念以及对愤怒表达的控制需求表现出最高的相关性(r = 0.727)。结果表明,MCRS是测量精神分裂症患者元认知的可靠工具。

相似文献

1
Metacognitive Rating Scale: A Study Applying a Korean Translation to Individuals with Schizophrenia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 25;18(13):6853. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136853.
2
[Psychometric approach of metacognition: Pilot study in clinical population].
Encephale. 2017 Apr;43(2):120-127. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
5
Metacognitions, rumination, and worry in personality disorder.
J Affect Disord. 2021 Oct 1;293:117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.06.024. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
6
The relationship between metacognitive beliefs and symptoms in eating disorders.
Psychiatriki. 2020 Jul-Sep;31(3):225-235. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2020.313.225.
7
Dysfunctional metacognition across psychopathologies: A meta-analytic review.
Eur Psychiatry. 2017 Sep;45:139-153. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.05.029. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
8
The relationship between dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs and problematic social networking sites use.
Scand J Psychol. 2020 Oct;61(5):593-598. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12634. Epub 2020 Mar 7.
9
Testing relationships between metacognitive beliefs, anxiety and depression in cardiac and cancer patients: Are they transdiagnostic?
J Psychosom Res. 2019 Sep;124:109738. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.109738. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
10
A short form of the metacognitions questionnaire: properties of the MCQ-30.
Behav Res Ther. 2004 Apr;42(4):385-96. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00147-5.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Individual differences in anger and displaced aggression: The role of metacognitive beliefs and anger rumination.
Aggress Behav. 2020 Mar;46(2):162-169. doi: 10.1002/ab.21878. Epub 2020 Jan 19.
2
Metacognitive self-assessment scale: psychometric properties and clinical implications.
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2021 Sep-Oct;28(5):596-606. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2019.1671843. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
3
Metacognitive beliefs as psychological predictors of social functioning: An investigation with young people at risk of psychosis.
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Apr;262:520-526. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.09.037. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
4
Metacognitive beliefs and rumination as predictors of anger: A prospective study.
Aggress Behav. 2017 Sep;43(5):421-429. doi: 10.1002/ab.21699. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
5
A meta-analysis of metacognitive beliefs as implicated in the self-regulatory executive function model in clinical psychosis.
Schizophr Res. 2017 Jan;179:75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.09.032. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
6
Unhelpful metacognitive beliefs in early psychosis are associated with affective symptoms and childhood social adjustment.
Schizophr Res. 2015 Dec;169(1-3):280-285. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.10.026. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
7
The Metacognitive Anger Processing (MAP) Scale: Preliminary Testing.
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2016 Jul;44(4):504-9. doi: 10.1017/S1352465815000272. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
8
Metacognitive and social cognition approaches to understanding the impact of schizophrenia on social quality of life.
Schizophr Res. 2015 Feb;161(2-3):386-91. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.11.008. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
10
Metacognitive training for patients with schizophrenia: preliminary evidence for a targeted, single-module programme.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;48(12):1126-36. doi: 10.1177/0004867413508451. Epub 2013 Oct 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验