• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

标准化病理检查能否提高导管腺癌腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术后的淋巴结获取量?

Can standardized pathology examination increase the lymph node yield following laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma?

作者信息

Sahakyan Mushegh A, Haugvik Sven P, Røsok Bård I, Kazaryan Airazat M, Ignjatovic Dejan, Buanes Trond, Labori Knut J, Verbeke Caroline S, Edwin Bjørn

机构信息

The Intervention Centre, Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway.

Department of Surgery, Drammen Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway; Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

HPB (Oxford). 2018 Feb;20(2):175-181. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.08.038. Epub 2017 Sep 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.hpb.2017.08.038
PMID:28943397
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lymph node yield (LNY) is an indicator of oncological adequacy of surgery in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Our hypothesis is that standardized pathology examination (SPE) aimed at accurate staging can increase the LNY without changing surgical technique.

METHODS

After the introduction of SPE for distal pancreatosplenectomy specimens at Oslo University Hospital, prospective data were collected on patients with PDAC undergoing laparoscopic distal pancreatosplenectomy (LDP). Their data were compared with retrospective data from specimens examined in a non-standardized way (NSPE).

RESULTS

SPE and NSPE were applied to 20 and 33 specimens, respectively. SPE was associated with a higher LNY and a higher median number of positive lymph nodes (PLN) in the specimen (18 vs 7, P = 0.001 and 4 vs 1, P = 0.005, respectively). In the stepwise regression model, SPE and younger age resulted in an increased LNY. In the logistic regression model, increased LNY and larger tumor size positively correlated with the presence of PLN.

CONCLUSION

SPE of distal pancreatosplenectomy specimens is associated with higher LNY in patients with PDAC, which increases the likelihood of detecting PLN and reduces the risk of understaging. These findings also indicate that the LDP technique provides an adequate LNY in patients with PDAC.

摘要

背景

淋巴结收获量(LNY)是胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)患者手术肿瘤学充分性的一个指标。我们的假设是,旨在准确分期的标准化病理检查(SPE)可在不改变手术技术的情况下增加LNY。

方法

在奥斯陆大学医院对远端胰腺脾切除术标本引入SPE后,收集了接受腹腔镜远端胰腺脾切除术(LDP)的PDAC患者的前瞻性数据。将他们的数据与以非标准化方式(NSPE)检查的标本的回顾性数据进行比较。

结果

SPE和NSPE分别应用于20个和33个标本。SPE与标本中更高的LNY和更高的阳性淋巴结(PLN)中位数相关(分别为18个对7个,P = 0.001;4个对1个,P = 0.005)。在逐步回归模型中,SPE和更年轻的年龄导致LNY增加。在逻辑回归模型中,LNY增加和肿瘤尺寸更大与PLN的存在呈正相关。

结论

远端胰腺脾切除术标本的SPE与PDAC患者更高的LNY相关,这增加了检测到PLN的可能性并降低了分期不足的风险。这些发现还表明,LDP技术为PDAC患者提供了足够的LNY。

相似文献

1
Can standardized pathology examination increase the lymph node yield following laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma?标准化病理检查能否提高导管腺癌腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术后的淋巴结获取量?
HPB (Oxford). 2018 Feb;20(2):175-181. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.08.038. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
2
Short- and mid-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A retrospective propensity score-matched study.机器人与腹腔镜胰远端脾切除术治疗胰导管腺癌的短期和中期结果:回顾性倾向评分匹配研究。
Int J Surg. 2018 Jul;55:81-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.05.024. Epub 2018 May 23.
3
A Comprehensive Assessment of Accurate Lymph Node Staging and Preoperative Detection in Resected Pancreatic Cancer.对切除胰腺癌中准确的淋巴结分期和术前检测的全面评估。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Feb;22(2):295-302. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3607-7. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
4
Laparoscopic distal pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.腹腔镜下胰体尾切除术治疗胰腺导管腺癌。
Surg Today. 2015 Jul;45(7):808-12. doi: 10.1007/s00595-014-1021-2. Epub 2014 Aug 26.
5
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer is safe and effective.腹腔镜胰体尾切除术治疗胰腺癌安全有效。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):53-61. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5633-7. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
6
Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a single-center experience.腹腔镜与开放远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺导管腺癌:单中心经验
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2017 Jun;18(6):532-538. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1600541.
7
Laparoscopic Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.腹腔镜与开放远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺腺癌
World J Surg. 2016 Jun;40(6):1477-84. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3412-6.
8
Reappraisal of nodal staging and study of lymph node station involvement in distal pancreatectomy for body-tail pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.胰体尾胰腺导管腺癌胰体尾切除术时的淋巴结分期再评估及淋巴结站别侵犯的研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Sep;46(9):1734-1741. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
9
LDP vs ODP for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a case matched study from a single-institution.胰头十二指肠切除术(LDP)与保留幽门的胰十二指肠切除术(ODP)治疗胰腺腺癌:一项来自单一机构的病例匹配研究
BMC Gastroenterol. 2015 Dec 22;15:182. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0411-2.
10
Lymph node metastases in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: predictors of disease recurrence and survival.切除的胰腺导管腺癌中的淋巴结转移:疾病复发和生存的预测因素
Br J Cancer. 2017 Dec 5;117(12):1874-1882. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.349. Epub 2017 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Robot-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy in Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: An International, Retrospective, Cohort Study.机器人辅助与腹腔镜下胰体尾切除术治疗可切除胰腺癌患者的国际回顾性队列研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 May;30(5):3023-3032. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-13054-2. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
2
Prognostic Impact of Resection Margin Status in Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma.远端胰腺切除术治疗导管腺癌时切缘状态的预后影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Jan;29(1):366-375. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10464-6. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
3
Long term oncological outcome of laparoscopic techniques in pancreatic cancer.
腹腔镜技术用于胰腺癌的长期肿瘤学结局
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Dec 16;10(12):383-391. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v10.i12.383.