Ueda Keijiro, Ito Tetsuhide, Kawabe Ken, Lee Lingaku, Fujiyama Takashi, Tachibana Yuichi, Miki Masami, Yasunaga Kohei, Takaoka Takehiro, Nishie Akihiro, Asayama Yoshiki, T Jensen Robert, Ogawa Yoshihiro
Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Japan.
Department of Gastroenterology, Kyushu Rosai Hospital, Japan.
Intern Med. 2017 Nov 15;56(22):2985-2991. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.9107-17. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
Objective The selective arterial secretagogue injection (SASI) test is considered indispensable for the accurate localization of insulinoma. However, the optimum timing of the post-injection evaluation is controversial, as some studies recommend 60 seconds [SASI (60 seconds)] while others support 120 seconds [SASI (120 seconds)]. The aim of this study was to determine the optimum timing for the SASI test evaluation for insulinoma localization. Methods Thirteen patients with surgically proven insulinoma were studied retrospectively. For the SASI test, immunoreactive insulin (IRI) was determined at baseline and at 30, 60, 90, and 120 seconds after calcium gluconate injection. A two-fold or greater increase in IRI over the baseline value was considered positive. The localization abilities of SASI (60 seconds) and SASI (120 seconds) were then compared. Results In 13 patients, a secretagogue was injected into 40 arteries supplying the pancreas. In the SASI (60 seconds) and SASI (120 seconds), the respective findings were as follows: positive predictive value, 72.2% and 68.2%; false positive rate, 25.0% and 35.0%; and rate of positivity in the head and body/tail, 38.5% and 46.2%. When the artery with the largest change was taken as the dominant artery, the localization detection sensitivity was 76.9% for SASI (60 seconds) and 92.3% for SASI (120 seconds). The sensitivity of morphological imaging techniques for localization ranged from 61.5-91.7%. Conclusion Compared with SASI (60 seconds) or morphological imaging, the insulinoma localization ability of SASI (120 seconds) was superior. Given these findings, we believe that the IRI level should be measured at 120 seconds in the SASI test.
目的 选择性动脉促分泌素注射(SASI)试验被认为是胰岛素瘤准确定位不可或缺的检查。然而,注射后评估的最佳时机存在争议,一些研究推荐60秒[SASI(60秒)],而另一些研究支持120秒[SASI(120秒)]。本研究的目的是确定SASI试验评估胰岛素瘤定位的最佳时机。方法 回顾性研究13例经手术证实为胰岛素瘤的患者。对于SASI试验,在基线以及注射葡萄糖酸钙后30、60、90和120秒测定免疫反应性胰岛素(IRI)。IRI较基线值增加两倍或更多被认为是阳性。然后比较SASI(60秒)和SASI(120秒)的定位能力。结果 13例患者中,向供应胰腺的40条动脉注射了促分泌素。在SASI(60秒)和SASI(120秒)中,各自的结果如下:阳性预测值分别为72.2%和68.2%;假阳性率分别为25.0%和35.0%;头部和体部/尾部的阳性率分别为38.5%和46.2%。当将变化最大的动脉作为主要动脉时,SASI(60秒)的定位检测灵敏度为76.9%,SASI(120秒)为92.3%。形态学成像技术的定位灵敏度范围为61.5 - 91.7%。结论 与SASI(60秒)或形态学成像相比,SASI(120秒)对胰岛素瘤的定位能力更强。基于这些发现,我们认为在SASI试验中应在120秒时测量IRI水平。