Matsuhashi Nobuhisa, Takahashi Takao, Tanahashi Toshiyuki, Matsui Satoshi, Imai Hisashi, Tanaka Yoshihiro, Yamaguchi Kazuya, Osada Shinji, Yoshida Kazuhiro
Department of Surgical Oncology, Gifu University School of Medicine, Gifu 501-1194, Japan.
Oncol Lett. 2017 Oct;14(4):4142-4150. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.6664. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the short-term surgical outcomes of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (ISR) for a lower rectal tumor in comparison with a case-control series of patients undergoing open ISR. Quality of life factors and anal function were also evaluated. Between July 2008 and April 2013, 103 patients with lower rectal cancer underwent laparoscopic surgery at the Surgical Oncology Department of Gifu University School of Medicine. A total of 25 patients with lower rectal cancer underwent ISR, and 19/25 patients who underwent laparoscopic ISR were compared with the control group of 6 patients who underwent open ISR. The technical feasibility and safety of ISR, and the short- and long-term outcomes following laparoscopic ISR were evaluated. Additional data associated with fecal incontinence conditions of the postoperative patients were evaluated using the Modified Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life scale. There was no recorded perioperative mortality, three complications were observed to occur in three patients and the morbidity rate was 15.8%. The postoperative complications detected included bleeding in one patient and ileus in two patients of the laparoscopic ISR group. The rate of severe complications of grade ≥3a was 15.8% and that of grade ≥3b was 5.3%. In the matched case-control study, blood loss was significantly lower in the laparoscopic ISR group. The median postoperative hospital stay was 14.1 days in the laparoscopic ISR group, which was significantly shorter compared with in the open ISR group (18.7 days). Cancer recurrence was detected in one (5%) patient in a single inguinal lymph node. No significant differences between the ISR and ultra-low anterior resection (ULAR) groups were observed in the maximum resting and maximum squeeze pressures; the outcomes for anal function and fecal incontinence were the same for ISR and ULAR. Thus, laparoscopic ISR for lower rectal cancer may provide a benefit in the early postoperative period without increasing morbidity or mortality.
本研究的目的是评估腹腔镜括约肌间切除术(ISR)治疗低位直肠肿瘤的短期手术效果,并与接受开放性ISR的病例对照系列患者进行比较。还评估了生活质量因素和肛门功能。2008年7月至2013年4月期间,岐阜大学医学院外科肿瘤学系有103例低位直肠癌患者接受了腹腔镜手术。共有25例低位直肠癌患者接受了ISR,将19/25例接受腹腔镜ISR的患者与6例接受开放性ISR的对照组患者进行了比较。评估了ISR的技术可行性和安全性,以及腹腔镜ISR后的短期和长期结果。使用改良的大便失禁生活质量量表评估术后患者与大便失禁情况相关的其他数据。围手术期无死亡记录,3例患者发生3例并发症,发病率为15.8%。腹腔镜ISR组术后检测到的并发症包括1例出血和2例肠梗阻。≥3a级严重并发症发生率为15.8%,≥3b级为5.3%。在配对病例对照研究中,腹腔镜ISR组的失血量明显更低。腹腔镜ISR组术后中位住院时间为14.1天,与开放性ISR组(18.7天)相比明显更短。在单个腹股沟淋巴结中检测到1例(5%)患者癌症复发。ISR组和超低位前切除术(ULAR)组在最大静息压力和最大挤压压力方面未观察到显著差异;ISR和ULAR在肛门功能和大便失禁方面的结果相同。因此,腹腔镜ISR治疗低位直肠癌在术后早期可能有益,且不增加发病率或死亡率。