Pendergast Felicity J, Leech Rebecca M, McNaughton Sarah A
Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125 Australia.
Curr Nutr Rep. 2017;6(3):212-227. doi: 10.1007/s13668-017-0211-0. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
Recent developments in technology-based dietary assessment allow real-time data collection of eating occasions, yet their application to assessing eating pattern constructs has not been evaluated. The purpose of this review was to examine existing electronic and mobile food diary methods in relation to their ability to assess eating patterns constructs (e.g. patterning, format and context of eating occasions).
A systematic search of electronic databases identified 18 dietary assessment methods. Multiple methods with diverse technological capabilities have been developed, yet few studies report on their ability to assess all eating pattern constructs, particularly eating occasion context. Validity of the methods to assess overall dietary intake was found to be similar to traditional dietary assessment methods.
A diverse range of methods are available for examining the patterning and format/content, but not context, of eating occasions. Further consideration of eating pattern constructs is required when developing dietary assessment methods.
基于技术的膳食评估的最新进展允许实时收集饮食情况的数据，但其在评估饮食模式结构方面的应用尚未得到评估。本综述的目的是研究现有的电子和移动食物日记方法评估饮食模式结构（如饮食情况的模式、形式和背景）的能力。
对电子数据库进行系统检索，确定了18种膳食评估方法。已开发出多种具有不同技术能力的方法，但很少有研究报告其评估所有饮食模式结构的能力，尤其是饮食情况背景。发现这些方法评估总体膳食摄入量的有效性与传统膳食评估方法相似。
有多种方法可用于研究饮食情况的模式和形式/内容，但无法研究其背景。在开发膳食评估方法时，需要进一步考虑饮食模式结构。
