• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于STARFISH智能手机应用程序的智能手机步数计数算法的验证。

Validation of smartphone step count algorithm used in STARFISH smartphone application.

作者信息

Dybus Aleksandra, Paul Lorna, Wyke Sally, Brewster Stephen, Gill Jason M R, Ramsay Andrew, Campbell Evan

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

School of Health and Life Science, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Technol Health Care. 2017 Dec 4;25(6):1157-1162. doi: 10.3233/THC-170970.

DOI:10.3233/THC-170970
PMID:28946599
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Smartphone sensors are underutilised in rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE

To validate the step count algorithm used in the STARFISH smartphone application.

METHODS

Twenty-two healthy adults (8 male, 14 female) walked on a treadmill for 5 minutes at 0.44, 0.67, 0.90 and 1.33 m⋅s-1. Each wore an activPALTM and four Samsung Galaxy S3TM smartphones, with the STARFISH application running, in: 1) a belt carrycase, 2) a trouser or skirt pocket), 3a) a handbag on shoulder for females or 3b) shirt pocket for males and 4) an upper arm strap. Step counts of the STARFISH application and the activPALTM were compared at corresponding speeds and Bland-Altman statistics used to assess level of agreement (LOA).

RESULTS

The LOA between the STARFISH application and activPALTM varied across the four speeds and positions, but improved as speed increased. The LOA ranged from 105-177% at 0.44 m⋅s-1; 50-98% at 0.67 m⋅s-1; 19-67% at 0.9 m⋅s-1 and 8-53% at 1.33 m⋅s-1. The best LOAs were at 1.33 m⋅s-1 in the shirt pocket (8%) and upper arm strap (12%) positions.

CONCLUSIONS

Step counts measured by the STARFISH smartphone application are valid in most body positions especially at walking speeds of 0.9 m⋅s-1 and above.

摘要

背景

智能手机传感器在康复领域未得到充分利用。

目的

验证STARFISH智能手机应用程序中使用的步数计算算法。

方法

22名健康成年人(8名男性,14名女性)在跑步机上以0.44、0.67、0.90和1.33米·秒⁻¹的速度行走5分钟。每个人都佩戴一个activPALTM和四部三星Galaxy S3TM智能手机,并运行STARFISH应用程序,分别放置在:1)腰带携带盒中;2)裤子或裙子口袋里;3a)女性的肩背手提包中或3b)男性的衬衫口袋里;4)上臂绑带处。比较STARFISH应用程序和activPALTM在相应速度下的步数,并使用Bland-Altman统计量评估一致性水平(LOA)。

结果

STARFISH应用程序和activPALTM之间的LOA在四种速度和位置上有所不同,但随着速度增加而改善。在0.44米·秒⁻¹时,LOA范围为105 - 177%;在0.67米·秒⁻¹时为50 - 98%;在0.9米·秒⁻¹时为19 - 67%;在1.33米·秒⁻¹时为8 - 53%。最佳的LOA出现在1.33米·秒⁻¹时,分别是衬衫口袋(8%)和上臂绑带(12%)的位置。

结论

STARFISH智能手机应用程序测量的步数在大多数身体位置都是有效的,尤其是在0.9米·秒⁻¹及以上的步行速度下。

相似文献

1
Validation of smartphone step count algorithm used in STARFISH smartphone application.用于STARFISH智能手机应用程序的智能手机步数计数算法的验证。
Technol Health Care. 2017 Dec 4;25(6):1157-1162. doi: 10.3233/THC-170970.
2
Validity of a Smartphone-Based Fall Detection Application on Different Phones Worn on a Belt or in a Trouser Pocket.基于智能手机的跌倒检测应用程序在佩戴于腰部或裤兜中的不同手机上的有效性。
Assist Technol. 2015 Spring;27(1):18-23. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2014.949015.
3
Reliability and validity of a smartphone-based assessment of gait parameters across walking speed and smartphone locations: Body, bag, belt, hand, and pocket.基于智能手机在不同步行速度和智能手机放置位置(身体、背包、腰带、手部和口袋)下对步态参数评估的可靠性和有效性。
Gait Posture. 2017 Oct;58:516-522. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.09.030. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
4
Validity of the "Samsung Health" application to measure steps: A study with two different samsung smartphones."三星健康"应用程序测量步数的有效性:使用两款不同三星智能手机的研究。
J Sports Sci. 2019 Apr;37(7):788-794. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1527199. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
5
Validity of the iPhone M7 motion co-processor as a pedometer for able-bodied ambulation.苹果iPhone M7运动协处理器作为健全人步行步数计的有效性。
J Sports Sci. 2016 Dec;34(23):2160-2164. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1189086. Epub 2016 May 30.
6
Assessing a novel way to measure step count while walking using a custom mobile phone application.评估一种使用定制手机应用程序来测量行走时步数的新方法。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 6;13(11):e0206828. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206828. eCollection 2018.
7
Validity of activity trackers, smartphones, and phone applications to measure steps in various walking conditions.计步器、智能手机和手机应用程序在各种步行条件下测量步数的有效性。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018 Jul;28(7):1818-1827. doi: 10.1111/sms.13074. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
8
Validation of the Fitbit One® for physical activity measurement at an upper torso attachment site.验证Fitbit One®在上半身附着部位进行身体活动测量的有效性。
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Apr 12;9:213. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2020-8.
9
Validation of the ADAMO Care Watch for step counting in older adults.ADAMO Care Watch用于老年人步数计数的验证。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 9;13(2):e0190753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190753. eCollection 2018.
10
Validation of different stepping counters during treadmill and over ground walking.在跑步机和地面行走时不同计步器的验证。
Gait Posture. 2020 Jul;80:80-83. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.05.037. Epub 2020 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the Feasibility and Usability of Smartphones for Monitoring Physical Activity in Orthopedic Patients: Prospective Observational Study.探索智能手机在监测骨科患者身体活动中的可行性和可用性:前瞻性观察研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Jul 4;11:e44442. doi: 10.2196/44442.
2
Interventions for reducing sedentary behaviour in people with stroke.干预措施减少脑卒中患者的久坐行为。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 29;6(6):CD012996. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012996.pub2.
3
Recommendations for determining the validity of consumer wearable and smartphone step count: expert statement and checklist of the INTERLIVE network.
推荐用于确定消费者可穿戴设备和智能手机计步有效性的标准:INTERLIVE 网络的专家声明和清单。
Br J Sports Med. 2021 Jul;55(14):780-793. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103147. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
4
Mobile Apps to Quantify Aspects of Physical Activity: a Systematic Review on its Reliability and Validity.移动应用程序量化身体活动的各个方面:对其可靠性和有效性的系统评价。
J Med Syst. 2020 Jan 8;44(2):51. doi: 10.1007/s10916-019-1506-z.