Bulage Lilian, Masiira Ben, Ario Alex R, Matovu Joseph K B, Nsubuga Peter, Kaharuza Frank, Nankabirwa Victoria, Routh Janell, Zhu Bao-Ping
Uganda Public Health Fellowship Program - Field Epidemiology Track, Ministry of Health - Makerere University School of Public Health, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
African Field Epidemiology Network, Kampala, Uganda.
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Sep 25;17(1):641. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2720-2.
Between January and June, 2015, a large typhoid fever outbreak occurred in Kampala, Uganda, with 10,230 suspected cases. During the outbreak, area surgeons reported a surge in cases of typhoid intestinal perforation (TIP), a complication of typhoid fever. We conducted an investigation to characterize TIP cases and identify modifiable risk factors for TIP.
We defined a TIP case as a physician-diagnosed typhoid patient with non-traumatic terminal ileum perforation. We identified cases by reviewing medical records at all five major hospitals in Kampala from 2013 to 2015. In a matched case-control study, we compared potential risk factors among TIP cases and controls; controls were typhoid patients diagnosed by TUBEX TF, culture, or physician but without TIP, identified from the outbreak line-list and matched to cases by age, sex and residence. Cases and controls were interviewed using a standard questionnaire from 1st -23rd December 2015. We used conditional logistic regression to assess risk factors for TIP and control for confounding.
Of the 88 TIP cases identified during 2013-2015, 77% (68/88) occurred between January and June, 2015; TIPs sharply increased in January and peaked in March, coincident with the typhoid outbreak. The estimated risk of TIP was 6.6 per 1000 suspected typhoid infections (68/10,230). The case-fatality rate was 10% (7/68). Cases sought care later than controls; Compared with 29% (13/45) of TIP cases and 63% (86/137) of controls who sought treatment within 3 days of onset, 42% (19/45) of cases and 32% (44/137) of controls sought treatment 4-9 days after illness onset (OR = 2.2, 95%CI = 0.83-5.8), while 29% (13/45) of cases and 5.1% (7/137) of controls sought treatment ≥10 days after onset (OR = 11, 95%CI = 1.9-61). 68% (96/141) of cases and 23% (23/100) of controls had got treatment before being treated at the treatment centre (OR = 9.0, 95%CI = 1.1-78).
Delay in seeking treatment increased the risk of TIPs. For future outbreaks, we recommended aggressive community case-finding, and informational campaigns in affected communities and among local healthcare providers to increase awareness of the need for early and appropriate treatment.
2015年1月至6月期间,乌干达坎帕拉发生了大规模伤寒热疫情,疑似病例达10230例。疫情期间,当地外科医生报告称,伤寒热的并发症——伤寒肠穿孔(TIP)病例激增。我们开展了一项调查,以描述TIP病例的特征,并确定TIP的可改变风险因素。
我们将TIP病例定义为经医生诊断的患有非创伤性回肠末端穿孔的伤寒患者。通过查阅2013年至2015年坎帕拉所有五家主要医院的病历记录来确定病例。在一项匹配病例对照研究中,我们比较了TIP病例和对照之间的潜在风险因素;对照为通过TUBEX TF、培养或医生诊断为伤寒但无TIP的患者,从疫情名单中识别,并按年龄、性别和居住地与病例匹配。2015年12月1日至23日,使用标准问卷对病例和对照进行了访谈。我们使用条件逻辑回归来评估TIP的风险因素并控制混杂因素。
在2013 - 2015年期间确定的88例TIP病例中,77%(68/88)发生在2015年1月至6月;TIP病例在1月急剧增加,并在3月达到峰值,与伤寒疫情一致。TIP的估计风险为每1000例疑似伤寒感染6.6例(共68/10230)。病死率为10%(7/68)。病例比对照寻求治疗的时间更晚;与发病3天内寻求治疗的TIP病例的29%(13/45)和对照的63%(86/137)相比,42%(19/45)的病例和32%(44/137)的对照在发病4 - 9天后寻求治疗(比值比[OR]=2.2,95%置信区间[CI]=0.83 - 5.8),而29%(13/45)的病例和5.1%(7/137)的对照在发病≥10天后寻求治疗(OR = 11,95%CI = 1.9 - 61)。68%(96/141)的病例和23%(23/100)的对照在治疗中心接受治疗前曾接受过治疗(OR = 9.0,9%CI = 1.1 - 78)。
延迟寻求治疗增加了TIP的风险。对于未来的疫情,我们建议积极开展社区病例发现工作,并在受影响社区和当地医疗服务提供者中开展宣传活动,以提高对早期和适当治疗必要性的认识。