Suppr超能文献

关节镜手术后大型/巨大肩袖撕裂再撕裂的危险因素:撕裂模式分析

Risk factors for retear of large/massive rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic surgery: an analysis of tearing patterns.

作者信息

Shimokobe Hisao, Gotoh Masafumi, Honda Hirokazu, Nakamura Hidehiro, Mitsui Yasuhiro, Kakuma Tatsuyuki, Okawa Takahiro, Shiba Naoto

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, 67 Asahi-machi, kurume, Fukuoka, 830-0011, Japan.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kurume University Medical Center, 155-1 Kokubu-machi Kurume, Fukuoka, 839-0863, Japan.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Sep 25;12(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0643-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have evaluated the risk factors for retear of large/massive rotator cuff tears (RCTs) that were treated arthroscopically; however, most studies did not evaluate tear patterns. The present study hypothesized that postoperative risk factors are affected by the tearing patterns in large/massive cuff tears in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR).

METHODS

One hundred fifty patients with large/massive cuff tears underwent ARCR at our institution. Of these, 102 patients were enrolled in this study, with an average symptom duration of 36.3 ± 43.9 months and average age of 63.9 ± 9.4 years. According to the arthroscopic findings and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the 102 patients were divided into three groups based on the tendon location: anterosuperior tears (N = 59, group AS), posteosuperior tears (N = 21, group PS), and anteroposterior-extending tears (N = 22, group APE). Functional outcome was evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score. Retear was evaluated with MRI at a minimum of 1 year after surgery, using Sugaya's classification; Types IV and V were considered postoperative retears. Factors affecting postoperative retear were examined with univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

JOA/UCLA scores significantly improved postoperatively in the three groups (P < 0.01 for all). Postoperative retear was noted in 26 of 102 patients (25.5%) in this series: 10 patients in group AS (16.9%), 9 in group PS (42.9%), and 7 in group APE (31.8%). The retear rate was significantly higher in group PS than in the other two groups (P = 0.02). Multivariate analysis showed that decreased preoperative active external rotation range was a unique risk factor for postoperative retear in the PS and APE groups (95% confidence interval: 0.02-0.18, cut-off value: 25°, with an area under the curve of 0.90, P = 0.0025).

CONCLUSIONS

Although multivariate analysis failed to detect significant risk factor for retear in patients with anterosuperior large/massive cuff tears who undergo ARCR, it demonstrated that active external rotation less than 25° before surgery is a significant risk factor in those with posterosuperior large/massive tears. This study may help surgeons understand the results of arthroscopic surgery in patients with large/massive tears.

摘要

背景

既往研究评估了关节镜治疗的大型/巨大肩袖撕裂(RCT)再撕裂的危险因素;然而,大多数研究未评估撕裂模式。本研究假设,在接受关节镜下肩袖修补术(ARCR)的患者中,大型/巨大肩袖撕裂的术后危险因素受撕裂模式的影响。

方法

150例大型/巨大肩袖撕裂患者在我院接受了ARCR。其中,102例患者纳入本研究,平均症状持续时间为36.3±43.9个月,平均年龄为63.9±9.4岁。根据关节镜检查结果和磁共振成像(MRI),将102例患者根据肌腱位置分为三组:前上方撕裂(N = 59例,AS组)、后上方撕裂(N = 21例,PS组)和前后延伸撕裂(N = 2例,APE组)。术前和术后使用日本骨科协会(JOA)评分和加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)评分评估功能结果。术后至少1年用MRI评估再撕裂情况,采用Sugaya分类;IV型和V型被视为术后再撕裂。通过单因素和多因素分析检查影响术后再撕裂的因素。

结果

三组患者术后JOA/UCLA评分均显著改善(均P < 0.01)。本系列102例患者中有26例(25.5%)出现术后再撕裂:AS组10例(16.9%),PS组9例(42.9%),APE组7例(31.8%)。PS组的再撕裂率显著高于其他两组(P = 0.02)。多因素分析显示,术前主动外旋范围减小是PS组和APE组术后再撕裂的唯一危险因素(95%置信区间:0.02 - 0.18,临界值:25°,曲线下面积为0.90,P = 0.0025)。

结论

虽然多因素分析未能检测出接受ARCR的前上方大型/巨大肩袖撕裂患者再撕裂的显著危险因素,但表明术前主动外旋小于25°是后上方大型/巨大撕裂患者的显著危险因素。本研究可能有助于外科医生了解大型/巨大撕裂患者的关节镜手术结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62b0/5613358/54f46063c607/13018_2017_643_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验