Canario Guzmán Julio Arturo, Espinal Roberto, Báez Jeannette, Melgen Ricardo Elias, Rosario Patricia Antonia Pérez, Mendoza Eddys Rafael
Centro Nacional de Investigaciones en Salud Materno Infantil Dr. Hugo Mendoza (CENISMI), Centro Los Héroes, Santo Domingo, República Dominicana.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Sep 25;15(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0246-0.
The establishment of international collaborative research partnerships in times of infectious disease outbreaks of international importance has been considered an ethical imperative. Frail health research systems in low- and middle-income countries can be an obstacle to achieve the goal of knowledge generation and the search for health equity before, during and after infectious disease outbreaks.
A qualitative case study was conducted to identify the challenges and opportunities facing the Dominican Republic with regards to developing international collaborative research partnerships in the context of the Zika outbreak and its ethical implications. Researchers conducted 34 interviews (n = 30 individual; n = 4 group) with 39 participants (n = 23 males; n = 16 females) representing the government, universities, international donor agencies, non-governmental organisations, community-based organisations and medical societies, in two metropolitan cities.
Five international collaborative research projects related to the Zika virus were identified. Major ethical challenges were linked to the governance of health research, training of human resources, the institutionalisation of scientific activity, access to research funds and cultural aspects. Capacity-building was not necessarily a component of some partnership agreements. With few exceptions, local researchers were merely participating in data collection and less on defining the problem. Opportunities for collaborative work included the possibility of participation in international research consortiums through calls for proposals.
The Dominican government and research stakeholders can contribute to the international response to the Zika virus through active participation in international collaborative research partnerships; however, public recognition of the need to embrace health research as part of public policy efforts is warranted. A working group led by the government and formed by national and international research stakeholders will be key to identify ways in which the country could respond to the ethical demand of generating new knowledge in times of outbreaks.
在具有国际重要性的传染病爆发期间建立国际合作研究伙伴关系被视为一项道德要求。低收入和中等收入国家脆弱的卫生研究系统可能成为在传染病爆发之前、期间和之后实现知识生成目标以及寻求卫生公平的障碍。
开展了一项定性案例研究,以确定多米尼加共和国在寨卡疫情背景下发展国际合作研究伙伴关系所面临的挑战和机遇及其伦理影响。研究人员在两个大城市对代表政府、大学、国际捐助机构、非政府组织、社区组织和医学协会的39名参与者(23名男性;16名女性)进行了34次访谈(30次个人访谈;4次小组访谈)。
确定了五个与寨卡病毒相关的国际合作研究项目。主要的伦理挑战与卫生研究治理、人力资源培训、科学活动的制度化、研究资金获取以及文化方面有关。能力建设不一定是某些伙伴关系协议的组成部分。除少数例外情况外,当地研究人员仅参与数据收集,较少参与问题界定。合作工作的机会包括通过招标参与国际研究财团的可能性。
多米尼加政府和研究利益相关者可通过积极参与国际合作研究伙伴关系,为国际应对寨卡病毒做出贡献;然而,有必要让公众认识到将卫生研究纳入公共政策努力的必要性。由政府牵头、国家和国际研究利益相关者组成的工作组对于确定该国在疫情期间应对生成新知识的伦理需求的方式至关重要。