University of North Dakota, Department of Psychology, 501 N. Columbia Rd, Stop 8380, Grand Forks, ND 58202-8380, USA.
Appetite. 2018 Jan 1;120:423-430. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.09.022. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
This study investigated learned expectancies of eating outcomes as a mechanism through which maladaptive avoidant strategies relate to eating psychopathology. Participants included 244 undergraduate students at a Midwestern university. The participants completed a battery of measures online. Preacher and Hayes's (2008) bootstrapping method of mediation and structural equation modeling were used to analyze the relationships among experiential avoidance, eating expectancies, and binge eating and to test how experiential avoidance fits within the Acquired Preparedness model of eating disorder risk that highlights the role of negative urgency. Results revealed that experiential avoidance was positively related to negative affect eating expectancies and to binge eating. Negative affect eating expectancies mediated the relationship between experiential avoidance and binge eating. Further, experiential avoidance more adequately explained binge eating in the Acquired Preparedness model of eating disorder risk than did negative urgency. The findings from this study suggest an alternative understanding of the pathways through which dispositional and psychosocial characteristics of undergraduate students may impact eating disorder symptomatology.
本研究探讨了进食结果的习得性期望作为一种机制,通过这种机制,适应不良的回避策略与进食心理病理学有关。参与者包括中西部一所大学的 244 名本科生。参与者在线完成了一系列的测试。采用 Preacher 和 Hayes(2008)的中介和结构方程模型的自举法来分析经验回避、进食期望和暴食之间的关系,并检验经验回避在强调负面冲动作用的进食障碍风险获得性准备模型中的作用。结果表明,经验回避与负性情绪进食期望和暴食呈正相关。负性情绪进食期望在经验回避和暴食之间起中介作用。此外,经验回避在进食障碍风险获得性准备模型中更能解释暴食,而不是负性冲动。本研究的结果表明,对于大学生的性格和心理社会特征如何影响进食障碍症状,可以有一个替代性的理解途径。