Kaymaz Cihangir
Department of Cardiology, Koşuyolu Yüksek İhtisas Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2017 Sep;45(Suppl 4):1-7. doi: 10.5543/tkda.2017.02646.
Although many patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) may need extended treatment, efficacy and safety issues of full- or lower-intensity anticoagulation over acetyl salicylic acid (ASA) treatment have remained to be determined. EINSTEIN CHOICE is a randomized, double-blind and phase 3 study, and compared either once-daily rivaroxaban (at doses of 20 mg or 10 mg) and 100 mg of ASA in patients with VTE who were in equipoise regarding the need for extended anticoagulation. Study drugs were administered for up to 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome was symptomatic recurrent fatal or nonfatal VTE and the principal safety outcome was major bleeding. A total of 3365 patients were included in the intentionto-treat analyses (median treatment duration, 351 days). The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 1.5% of patients receiving 20 mg of rivaroxaban and in 1.2% of patients receiving 10 mg of rivaroxaban, in comparison to 4.4% of those receiving aspirin (hazard ratio for 20 mg of rivaroxaban vs. ASA, 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20 to 0.59; hazard ratio for 10 mg of rivaroxaban vs. ASA, 0.26; 95% CI 0.14 to 0.47; P<0.001 for both comparisons). Rates of major bleeding and adverse events were comparable among three treatment groups. In conclusion, in patients with VTE in equipoise for extended anticoagulation, either a treatment dose (20 mg) or a prophylactic dose (10 mg) of rivaroxaban compared with ASA significantly reduced the risk of VTE recurrence without a significant increase in bleeding risk.
尽管许多静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)患者可能需要延长治疗时间,但全强度或低强度抗凝治疗相对于阿司匹林(ASA)治疗的疗效和安全性问题仍有待确定。EINSTEIN CHOICE是一项随机、双盲的3期研究,比较了在是否需要延长抗凝治疗上处于平衡状态的VTE患者中,每日一次服用利伐沙班(剂量为20毫克或10毫克)与100毫克ASA的效果。研究药物给药长达12个月。主要疗效结局为有症状的复发性致命或非致命VTE,主要安全性结局为大出血。共有3365例患者纳入意向性分析(中位治疗持续时间为351天)。接受20毫克利伐沙班治疗的患者中,主要疗效结局发生率为1.5%;接受10毫克利伐沙班治疗的患者中,该发生率为1.2%;而接受阿司匹林治疗的患者中该发生率为4.4%(20毫克利伐沙班与ASA相比的风险比为0.34;95%置信区间[CI]为0.20至0.59;10毫克利伐沙班与ASA相比的风险比为0.26;95%CI为0.14至0.47;两项比较的P均<0.001)。三个治疗组的大出血和不良事件发生率相当。总之,对于在延长抗凝治疗上处于平衡状态的VTE患者,与ASA相比,利伐沙班的治疗剂量(20毫克)或预防剂量(10毫克)均显著降低了VTE复发风险,且出血风险未显著增加。