Suppr超能文献

阿利吉仑单药治疗或与依那普利联合治疗与依那普利比较用于伴有或不伴有糖尿病的慢性心力衰竭患者:来自 ATMOSPHERE 试验的亚组分析。

Aliskiren alone or in combination with enalapril vs. enalapril among patients with chronic heart failure with and without diabetes: a subgroup analysis from the ATMOSPHERE trial.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 Jan;20(1):136-147. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.896. Epub 2017 Sep 25.

Abstract

AIMS

Because of concerns about the safety of aliskiren in patients with diabetes, study treatment was stopped prematurely in the Aliskiren Trial of Minimizing OutcomeS for Patients with HEart failuRE (ATMOSPHERE). We examined outcomes and treatment effect in these patients compared with those without diabetes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

ATMOSPHERE included 7016 patients with heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) randomly assigned to enalapril plus aliskiren, aliskiren alone, or enalapril. At baseline, 1944 (27.7%) patients had diabetes. Median follow-up was shorter in patients with diabetes compared with those without (24 months vs. 46 months). Among patients with diabetes, the primary endpoint of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure occurred in 216 patients (33.1%) in the enalapril group (reference), 172 (27.4%) in the aliskiren group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-1.00; P = 0.053], and 196 (29.5%) in the combination group (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.71-1.04; P = 0.13). The effects of the treatments studied did not differ significantly compared with patients without diabetes. In patients with diabetes, aliskiren monotherapy was associated with a lower risk of symptomatic hypotension compared to enalapril [42 (6.7%) vs. 65 (10.0%); P = 0.04], whereas other adverse events were generally balanced between the three groups.

CONCLUSION

In patients with HFrEF and diabetes, there was no signal of harm and a trend towards benefit when direct renin inhibition monotherapy was compared with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, whereas combined aliskiren and enalapril treatment led to more adverse events with no improvement in outcomes. Treatment effects did not differ in patients with diabetes compared with those without. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00853658.

摘要

目的

由于对阿利吉仑在糖尿病患者中的安全性存在担忧,阿利吉仑减少心力衰竭患者结局试验(ATMOSPHERE)提前停止了研究治疗。我们比较了这些患者与无糖尿病患者的结局和治疗效果。

方法和结果

ATMOSPHERE 纳入了 7016 例射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者,随机分为依那普利联合阿利吉仑、阿利吉仑单药或依那普利组。基线时,1944 例(27.7%)患者患有糖尿病。与无糖尿病患者相比,糖尿病患者的中位随访时间更短(24 个月 vs. 46 个月)。在患有糖尿病的患者中,依那普利组心血管死亡或心力衰竭住院的主要终点事件发生在 216 例(33.1%)患者中(参照组),阿利吉仑组发生 172 例(27.4%)(风险比 [HR] 0.82,95%置信区间 [CI] 0.67-1.00;P = 0.053),联合组发生 196 例(29.5%)(HR 0.86,95% CI 0.71-1.04;P = 0.13)。与无糖尿病患者相比,所研究的治疗方法的效果没有显著差异。在患有糖尿病的患者中,与依那普利相比,阿利吉仑单药治疗与症状性低血压风险降低相关[42 例(6.7%)比 65 例(10.0%);P = 0.04],而三组之间其他不良事件通常保持平衡。

结论

在 HFrEF 和糖尿病患者中,与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂相比,直接肾素抑制剂单药治疗没有显示出危害的迹象,并且有获益的趋势,而联合应用阿利吉仑和依那普利治疗则导致更多的不良事件,而结局没有改善。与无糖尿病患者相比,糖尿病患者的治疗效果没有差异。

临床试验注册网址

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT00853658。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验