Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Georgetown University/MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 Feb;20(2):359-369. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.937. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
To examine associations of below-target and target dose of enalapril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, with outcomes in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) Treatment trial.
Two thousand five hundred and sixty-nine patients with HFrEF (ejection fraction ≤35%) were randomized to below-target (5-10 mg/day) dose placebo (n = 1284) or enalapril (n = 1285). One month post-randomization, blind up-titration to target (20 mg/day) dose was attempted for both study drugs in 2458 patients. Among the 1444 patients who achieved dose up-titration (placebo, n = 748; enalapril, n = 696; mean dose for both groups, 20.0 mg/day), target dose enalapril (vs. target dose placebo) was associated with a 9% absolute lower risk of the combined endpoint of heart failure hospitalization or all-cause mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.70; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60-0.81; P < 0.001] during 4 years of follow-up. Among the 1014 patients who could not achieve target dose (placebo, n = 486; enalapril, n = 528; mean dose for both groups, 8.8 mg/day), below-target dose enalapril (vs. below-target dose placebo) was associated with a 12% absolute lower risk of the combined endpoint of heart failure hospitalization or all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.57-0.81; P < 0.001). Among the 1224 patients receiving enalapril, target (vs. below-target) dose had no association with the combined endpoint of heart failure hospitalization or all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.87-1.23; P = 0.695).
In patients with HFrEF, the clinical benefits of ACE inhibitors appear to be similar at both below-target and target doses.
在 Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) Treatment 试验中,研究血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂依那普利的目标剂量和低于目标剂量与射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者结局的相关性。
将 2569 名 HFrEF(射血分数≤35%)患者随机分为低于目标剂量(5-10mg/天)安慰剂组(n=1284)或依那普利组(n=1285)。随机分组后 1 个月,尝试对两种研究药物进行盲法滴定至目标剂量(20mg/天),共 2458 名患者。在 1444 名达到剂量滴定的患者中(安慰剂组,n=748;依那普利组,n=696;两组平均剂量为 20.0mg/天),目标剂量依那普利(与目标剂量安慰剂相比)与心力衰竭住院或全因死亡率的复合终点风险降低 9%相关[校正后的危险比(HR)0.70;95%置信区间(CI)0.60-0.81;P<0.001],随访 4 年。在 1014 名无法达到目标剂量的患者中(安慰剂组,n=486;依那普利组,n=528;两组平均剂量为 8.8mg/天),低于目标剂量的依那普利(与低于目标剂量的安慰剂相比)与心力衰竭住院或全因死亡率的复合终点风险降低 12%相关(校正 HR 0.68;95%CI 0.57-0.81;P<0.001)。在接受依那普利治疗的 1224 名患者中,目标(与低于目标)剂量与心力衰竭住院或全因死亡率的复合终点无相关性(校正 HR 1.04;95%CI 0.87-1.23;P=0.695)。
在 HFrEF 患者中,ACE 抑制剂的临床获益在低于目标剂量和目标剂量时似乎相似。