Suppr超能文献

关于研究传播的参与者认知与偏好的定性研究

Qualitative study of participants' perceptions and preferences regarding research dissemination.

作者信息

Purvis Rachel S, Abraham Traci H, Long Christopher R, Stewart M Kathryn, Warmack T Scott, McElfish Pearl Anna

机构信息

a Office of Community Health and Research , University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest , Fayetteville , Arkansas , USA.

b Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System , Eugene J. Towbin Healthcare Center , North Little Rock , Arkansas , USA.

出版信息

AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017 Apr-Jun;8(2):69-74. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2017.1310146. Epub 2017 Mar 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The study identifies the experiences, preferences, and perceptions of research participants regarding dissemination of research findings at the participant level and community level.

METHODS

The qualitative study utilized focus-group methodology to explore research participants' experiences and preferences for the dissemination of research findings. Five focus groups were held with 53 participants who were recruited through existing community advisory boards in Arkansas.

RESULTS

Participants stated that researchers should always offer to share research findings. Participants explained that disseminating findings is appropriate because of their sense of ownership of results, it encourages participation facilitating higher quality research, and it may foster greater trust between researchers and participants. Participants also provided insights on how research findings should be shared, including recommendations for appropriate mode, timing, and context, as well as ways to share sensitive findings and the role of community partners in dissemination.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is consistent with other studies that document participants' desire to receive research findings and expands our knowledge by documenting participants' rationale for why they think it is important and their recommendations for how to share results. Further research is needed to understand why researchers are not disseminating study findings to participants and to test the best ways to share results.

摘要

背景

本研究确定了研究参与者在参与者层面和社区层面对于研究结果传播的经历、偏好和看法。

方法

这项定性研究采用焦点小组方法来探索研究参与者对研究结果传播的经历和偏好。通过阿肯色州现有的社区咨询委员会招募了53名参与者,举行了5个焦点小组。

结果

参与者表示研究人员应该始终主动分享研究结果。参与者解释说,传播研究结果是合适的,因为他们对研究结果有主人翁意识,这鼓励了参与,促进了更高质量的研究,并且可能增进研究人员与参与者之间的信任。参与者还就研究结果应如何分享提供了见解,包括对合适的方式、时间和背景的建议,以及分享敏感研究结果的方法和社区伙伴在传播中的作用。

结论

本研究与其他记录参与者希望获得研究结果的研究一致,并通过记录参与者认为研究结果重要的理由以及他们对如何分享结果的建议,扩展了我们的认识。需要进一步研究以了解研究人员为何不向参与者传播研究结果,并测试分享结果的最佳方式。

相似文献

1
Qualitative study of participants' perceptions and preferences regarding research dissemination.
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017 Apr-Jun;8(2):69-74. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2017.1310146. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
2
Health research participants' preferences for receiving research results.
Clin Trials. 2016 Dec;13(6):582-591. doi: 10.1177/1740774516665598. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
3
Health researchers' experiences, perceptions and barriers related to sharing study results with participants.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Mar 4;17(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0422-5.
5
Research Participant Views regarding Qualitative Data Sharing.
Ethics Hum Res. 2020 Mar;42(2):13-27. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500044.
6
Do Research Participants Trust Researchers or Their Institution?
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 Jul;13(3):285-294. doi: 10.1177/1556264618763253. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
7
Trust, Respect, and Reciprocity: Informing Culturally Appropriate Data-Sharing Practice in Vietnam.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Jul;10(3):251-63. doi: 10.1177/1556264615592387.
9
First Do No Harm: Ethical Concerns of Health Researchers That Discourage the Sharing of Results With Research Participants.
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2020 Apr-Jun;11(2):104-113. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1737980. Epub 2020 Mar 12.

引用本文的文献

2
The ethics and economics of organoid commercialization: potential donors' perspectives.
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Jul 29;26(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01269-3.
3
Respectful closure of a CEnR DNA integrity study: A bridge to sustained interactions with research participants.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Apr 28;9(1):e110. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.82. eCollection 2025.
5
Returning individual wearable sensor results to participants: perspectives on challenges and lessons learned.
Front Digit Health. 2025 Mar 25;7:1569452. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1569452. eCollection 2025.
7
Parental Grief and Bereavement: Exploring the Impact of Collaboratively Created Films on Audience Members.
Health Promot Pract. 2025 Mar 29:15248399251327962. doi: 10.1177/15248399251327962.
8
Returning Individualized Wearable Sensor Results to Older Adult Research Participants: A Pilot Study.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2025 Apr 7;80(5). doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaf027.
10
Regulating scientific and technological uncertainty: The precautionary principle in the context of human genomics and AI.
S Afr J Sci. 2023 May-Jun;119(5-6). doi: 10.17159/sajs.2023/15037. Epub 2023 May 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Health research participants' preferences for receiving research results.
Clin Trials. 2016 Dec;13(6):582-591. doi: 10.1177/1740774516665598. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
2
Community dissemination and genetic research: moving beyond results reporting.
Am J Med Genet A. 2015 Jul;167(7):1542-50. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37028. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
3
Designing for dissemination among public health researchers: findings from a national survey in the United States.
Am J Public Health. 2013 Sep;103(9):1693-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301165. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
4
Dissemination of research findings to research participants living with HIV in rural Uganda: challenges and rewards.
PLoS Med. 2013;10(3):e1001397. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001397. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
5
Rousseau at the Roundtable-The Social Contract and the Physician's Responsibility to Society.
Virtual Mentor. 2011 Oct 1;13(10):703-6. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2011.13.10.jdsc1-1110.
6
National Institutes of Health approaches to dissemination and implementation science: current and future directions.
Am J Public Health. 2012 Jul;102(7):1274-81. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300755. Epub 2012 May 17.
8
Dissemination of results in community-based participatory research.
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Oct;39(4):372-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.05.021.
9
Feedback of trial results to participants: a survey of clinicians' and patients' attitudes and experiences.
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2011 Apr;15(2):124-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2010.06.009. Epub 2010 Jul 31.
10
Providing research results to participants: attitudes and needs of adolescents and parents of children with cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb 20;27(6):878-83. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.5223. Epub 2009 Jan 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验